Yeah, that's true, and one reason I don't like the idea of compensated pistols - In my opinion the compensator also sort of wrecks the look of the big barrel. I like that "Smith & Wesson 586" look and the compensator, while small and ignorable, is a detail that just disagrees with me.That's one aspect of the 500 I don't like is the muzzle break. I've found shooting glasses are not optional but a must as there is a fair amount of debris that comes back at you. Burnt powder I believe.
On my 8 3/8" I 'think' it's the angle of the slots on the compensator. They're angled to blow back toward the shooter. Angled the other way, it may be alright.Yeah, that's true, and one reason I don't like the idea of compensated pistols - In my opinion the compensator also sort of wrecks the look of the big barrel. I like that "Smith & Wesson 586" look and the compensator, while small and ignorable, is a detail that just disagrees with me.
It might be possible to get a machinist to custom-make a compensator piece without the gas ports, but unfortunately that could cost a lot of money and I don't know if it'd be safe.
I guess there is only one option then: to ask Smith & Wesson to make compensator pieces without the holes. But I doubt they'd listen to a small audience like us.
- Dave.
That's somewhat along the lines of what I was thinking the first time I shot my buddy's. The first time I hung on to it, I told him that it was the biggest chunk of stainless steel I'd handled since I retired from the pulp mill.I've only ever seen one of those in the flesh, and they are massive ... Didn't fire it, and frankly I'm not sure I would, this thing looks bigger than some rifles !
I've only ever seen one of those in the flesh, and they are massive ... Didn't fire it, and frankly I'm not sure I would, this thing looks bigger than some rifles !




























