686 is the better gun. Cast (ruger) vs. forged (S&W). <---- Maybe the cost difference? Hmmm...
Not to mention as said above, the trigger on the Smith is way better.
And the forged Smith costs much more and both breaks and comes out of time much, much often with heavy use. What is "heavy" use for a smith? A few 100 rounds a month for a couple years of standard gun shop bought .357Mag loads will do it. Ask my father, and my uncle who have to take their guns in every 3rd summer. His old 4" Ruger GP he bought in 85' gets shot ALMOST just as much as has been going 100% for longer then I have been alive.
This is without a doubt the biggest pile of cr@p I have ever read and it is very clear that the poster has no idea of what they are talking about. I and a lot of my friends have put thousands of rounds throught 686 S&W revolvers of which all was factory and none of us and I mean NONE of us has ever had a problem with the gun going out of time. Wake up, if this was true no one would ever buy a S&W and they would have been out of buisness long ago.
Has everyone else ever noticed that when people make these claims about guns that it has never really happened to there gun but it is always someone elses gun that they have heard about.
To the above poster, maybe in the future it would be a good idea before you post that you really know what you are talking about.
Graydog
And the forged Smith costs much more and both breaks and comes out of time much, much often with heavy use. What is "heavy" use for a smith? A few 100 rounds a month for a couple years of standard gun shop bought .357Mag loads will do it. Ask my father, and my uncle who have to take their guns in every 3rd summer. His old 4" Ruger GP he bought in 85' gets shot ALMOST just as much as has been going 100% for longer then I have been alive.
The STOCK trigger on a smith is better, but the Ruger one is NOT bad...and can both be touch up and improved with time as well as you "learning" it. Triggers are one of the simplest and easiest and cheapest things to change on a gun. You can get the Ruger, get a nice trigger job done to it and buy a few boxes of ammo for the price of the smith alone.
Is this why their are so many more S&W`S compared to Rugers ? Is this why so many more S&W`S are still being used as service duty revolvers ? Please do not post such nonsense in the future thank you.
To the above poster, maybe in the future it would be a good idea before you post that you really know what you are talking about.
Graydog
Smith and Wesson has over 100 different revolver makes/models and have been doing it for longer...as in over 100 years. So no #### they are more common. Their most common guns are mostly their older ones, like the Model 10 that is in .38Spl and is by no means a boomer round, so of course those guns run well and have little issues. The issue once again with Smiths is HEAVY use with anything in .357Mag or bigger. Even the big double locked .500S&W has issue, just read about anyone who shoots theirs a lot.
Please understand common facts Chris Marchetti before you try to post something smart.
They are NOT bad guns by any means but they will need work if they are gonna receive HEAVY use. Its common fact, talk to anyone who competes who has to get their gun rebuilt all the time or the gun smiths who do it. This is Canada...people post on here that they have been waiting for gun smiths to fix their guns/do work for YEARS. Its not gonna be a fast process by ANY means do have your gun fixed here and warranty work is poor and slow at best for 99% of gun companies up north. That is something REAL to consider if your getting a Smith and plan to be a high volume shooter.
Besides if you ARE a high volume revolver shooter it shouldn't matter what wheel gun is in your hands, after 10,000s of rounds, you should be a good shot with any one. "Saying I suck with ___________ revolver cause the trigger sucks" is a cop out...YOU suck, not the gun.
If your getting a revolver and NOT gonna use it a lot why are you spending the money on a Smith? Why are you even gonna get a .357Mag? Get a cheap .22 wheel gun for that.
Read something online? LOL. I told you...my father has the gun and has issues every few years, my local gun shop...Gobles Firearms if your wanting to call?...does LOTS of work on Smiths, very little on Rugers.
What tool? nice to have but definitely not required on S&W's built at least into the 90's"...pros/cons of either gun..." The only thing to consider is which one fits your hand best. The Ruger will fit smaller hands far better than any Smith.
"...Cast (ruger) vs. forged..." Irrelevant Internet nonsense. The Ruger is much stronger than any Smith.
"...when it comes to triggers..." It makes no difference. Both will need a trigger job. All commercial firearms require a trigger job due to frivolous U.S. law suits. Doing one on a GP is far easier than on any Smith. Smiths require a special tool(buy it from Brownell's at about $20US or make it) to get the rebound slide and spring out. No such part in a Ruger.
Read something online? LOL. I told you...my father has the gun and has issues every few years, my local gun shop...Gobles Firearms if your wanting to call?...does LOTS of work on Smiths, very little on Rugers.
Guys...a few 1,000 rounds over a few years does NOT make you a heavy shooter. I am talking 750 - 1,250 rounds or so rounds a MONTH, so after 2-3 years that a lot of lead down range. Hand loading ammo to factory specs so by no means is it "hot" ammo.
Read your first post jeffcarr88 it was a few hundred rounds a month and now it is a thousand. What will your next story be? Do you think for a second that all of the people who are posting in this tread are stupid? I don't think they are. But one thing for for sure, there is one one guy who does not know what he is taliking about. My goodness I wonder who that could be?
Graydog