S&W M&P 9 vs. Glock 17

S&W M&P 9 vs. Glock 17

  • S&W M&P 9

    Votes: 119 55.3%
  • Glock 17

    Votes: 96 44.7%

  • Total voters
    215
Reality break - there isn't a hair's width difference between them, and the difference can be trained around in about 2 minutes and 1 mag full.

Yep.

The Glock just has a longer track record. Accuracy and shootability are a software problem.
 
I own both. M&p 40 with apex comp kit plus polymer trigger. Then Glock 17 gen 4 with almost everything redone on the inside. New edjector, trigger bar, sear(forget what Glock calls it) , connector ,trigger, only my slide, frame and barrel are stock. Still not happy with the Glock. M&p beats it in every way after All the work. If I go back to stock. Then Glock. Otherwise m&p
 
I've got both... I find the ergonomics of the M&P are a little better, but I like how rugged the Glock is.

It's really a win either way. They're both great pistols. Try them out and see what one feels better and go with that.
 
Glock for me.

But go with what works best for you.

1CanadaFlag.gif

-----------
NAA.
 
M&P: looks good, ergo is good. Trigger takes some getting use to.

Glock: Ugly, ugly, ugly.

Both are great guns, I'd go to war with either. But I'd rather have them in .40s&w.
 
Glock for me.

It's a personal choice as I started handgun shooting with a glock and the grip became natural...... M&P are great guns but not for me.
 
As stated previously, with both pistols being completely stock, the Glock wins, IMHO. The trigger on the M&P is horrible. Also, I quite like the feel of the Glock - no 2x4 feel to it at all. That's my 2 cents...
 
I have shot both many times, the M&P was better for ergonomics and accuracy for me so that is what I bought. Try both if you can.
 
I've spent the last few weeks trying to decide between these two guns. I watched a ton of videos and read a bunch of reviews. I also stopped by my local Army Surplus store and handled both. My M&P is now on route. :dancingbanana:
 
Back
Top Bottom