S&W M&P15-22 MOE version in Canada
- Thread starter TR1
- Start date
Hello FPembleton,
If you're asking about adding one that is similar to what the MOE version has: from what I've read on other forums, some guys are simply drilling the lower receiver and installing their own QD mount.
PM sent.
TR1
blaxsun
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Just use the QD mount on a CTR, no? (granted, on the stock and not on the lower)
Hooking a single point to a stock QD is a bad idea.
blaxsun
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
I didn't realize we were talking about a single point sling.
Hello blaxsun,
Well, it's similar to that, yes. The M&P15-22 MOE version (Model #811034) has some additional features that your tricked out Standard edition (Model #811030) does not have, namely the ambi sling attachment point on the lower and a threaded bbl with muzzle device attached. It has a MOE stock and grip of course (hence the name), whereas you have the CTR/MIAD installed.
The MOE version would also ship with the newer-generation magazines, while I notice that the one you have pictured appears to be a first gen.
Those are some of the obvious differences, although there are others. But of course, if someone doesn't want to wait around for the MOE to be released, you could outfit a Standard version as you have done.
The point of this thread and what I was looking for was an indication, likely from a dealer or distributor, that the MOE version will be imported and when. As was mentioned above (thanks CdnCombatMedic), the MOE version does have US State Dept. restricted features, but they may be lenient on that due to that fact it is not in a so-called 'military', centerfire calibre.
Thank you,
TR1
blaxsun
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Hi blaxsun,
I've seen no definitive information as to what is different or improved about the new generation magazines. There was some speculation that the feed lips were redesigned but there no significant design change evident when you compare the two mags, and S&W has never commented on the issue.
Anecdotal information suggests users who had problems with the original mags, then tried the new mags, and the feeding problems they had been experiencing were resolved. Then again, many guys have the original mags, use those only, and are reporting no issues.
Identification of the old vs. new magazines is achieved by comparing the markings on the lower portion. Original magazines are marked "22 LR", whereas the new generation magazines are marked "22LR" with "25 ROUND" below that.
(click thumbnail for full-size image)
Numerous customers on US-based forums are advising that they've sent their M&P15-22 guns back to the factory, due mostly to feeding/ejection issues, and the guns are returned with a short note which states that they were "upgraded to current specifications", but there is no detail as to the definition of this current spec. If the customer sends original magazines, they are replaced with the new gen magazines. There were also some guns that had the original internal springs replaced with springs that are blue in colour (and may have a different spec).
If you run a Google search for some of these terms, you'll find various forums/threads discussing these issues and resolutions.
HTH
TR1
I've seen no definitive information as to what is different or improved about the new generation magazines. There was some speculation that the feed lips were redesigned but there no significant design change evident when you compare the two mags, and S&W has never commented on the issue.
Anecdotal information suggests users who had problems with the original mags, then tried the new mags, and the feeding problems they had been experiencing were resolved. Then again, many guys have the original mags, use those only, and are reporting no issues.
Identification of the old vs. new magazines is achieved by comparing the markings on the lower portion. Original magazines are marked "22 LR", whereas the new generation magazines are marked "22LR" with "25 ROUND" below that.
(click thumbnail for full-size image)
Numerous customers on US-based forums are advising that they've sent their M&P15-22 guns back to the factory, due mostly to feeding/ejection issues, and the guns are returned with a short note which states that they were "upgraded to current specifications", but there is no detail as to the definition of this current spec. If the customer sends original magazines, they are replaced with the new gen magazines. There were also some guns that had the original internal springs replaced with springs that are blue in colour (and may have a different spec).
If you run a Google search for some of these terms, you'll find various forums/threads discussing these issues and resolutions.
HTH
TR1
Great news......from whom though???
Thanks for the great news, Sniper.
Please update us again when you have additional information as to delivery dates and pricing.
TR1
- Location
- Calgary, Alberta
Collapsible stocks alone are on the State Dept. naughty list, they tend to be more lax with .22s, so if the regular model is exportable, the MOE probably is too.
If Silva import the MOE, they will sell even more than they're selling now, I suspect. I don't like the flash hider though, it's pointless on a .22 and just makes it harder to clean.
- Location
- Calgary, Alberta
MOE has arrived .....
You should be able to see them by the end of this week or so ....
perhaps at your local dealer but they're not many to go around yet.
Muzzle brake, Sights, Rear Stock ......
Spring loaded pop up sight.
This is the sight when it's folded.
You should be able to see them by the end of this week or so ....
perhaps at your local dealer but they're not many to go around yet.
Muzzle brake, Sights, Rear Stock ......
Spring loaded pop up sight.
This is the sight when it's folded.
