The Ruger is $1500 or so now, and the lack of detachable mag is a no go for me when spending that much. $800ish more gets the Sako. I carry a hunting rifle many more hours than I shoot it. The max 44 mag revolver loads don't bother me, so I doubt muzzle blast will be an issue. I would mount an optic that I already own. I notice the only repeated criticism of the Sako is cost.
I'm the opposite. Much prefer a hinged floorplate in a rifle like that. I'm sure you would be happy with the Sako if you are looking for a detachable mag rifle, even though it's more $$$
Muzzle blast isn't an issue from the shorter barrel. Not that I've noticed, anyway.




















































