Sako A7 review

My in store observation...
Cabelas Nanaimo.

I love the fit and finish, rifle feels nice to hold, stock length was reasonable reach.

Action was smooth and nicely built. Being instore I didn't get to pull the trigger.

I like the locking mag system, especially give the $120 replacement cost of the mags.
I have read the scope isn't the best quality.

I almost bought it but money was tight and I went another direction.
 
sako A7

Local shop had a couple used ones in on consignment recently, both sans scopes. One in .270 Win and the other in .308 Win.

If I didn't already have a Tikka 595 in .308 Win, I would've grabbed the A7 in .308 Win. Handled it quite a bit & fit was great.

They eventually both sold or the owner took them back.

1CanadaFlag.gif

------------
NAA.
 
My in store observation...
Cabelas Nanaimo.

I love the fit and finish, rifle feels nice to hold, stock length was reasonable reach.

Action was smooth and nicely built. Being instore I didn't get to pull the trigger.

I like the locking mag system, especially give the $120 replacement cost of the mags.
I have read the scope isn't the best quality.

I almost bought it but money was tight and I went another direction.

Everything I was looking for in an "island gun".

The scope is better than I thought it would be (black one), but I swapped it out for a Leupold so I could use the Alumina lens caps.
 
No offence man but your post is nothing short of idiotic. Everything you said in your original post is wrong. The action your talking about is the correct weight. The 270 is the same weight as all the other long action calibers. And the fact you wanted to return a rifle over 1/2lb... If I was on the other line I would say your nuts dude. Lastly accuracy. My a7 in 300wsm is sub moa all day long. You know why??? Cause I didn't use $20 ammo like your using. Reload man. No gun is capable of guaranteeing sub MOA with factory loads. Because the ammo itself is what makes it not accurate. I have precision rifles which won't be sub MOA with factory.
 
My a7 in 300wsm is sub moa all day long. You know why??? Cause I didn't use $20 ammo like your using. Reload man. No gun is capable of guaranteeing sub MOA with factory loads. Because the ammo itself is what makes it not accurate.

This response ain't much better.....

OP never said he used $20 ammo, and actually indicates he was ready to try some handloads. Plus the Sako guarantee states "factory ammo" for 5 shot 1moa. Sako says right in the Warranty, anything other than factory loaded ammo voids the warranty.
I agree the best results will come from Handloading though
 
what I found with the A7 rifle was this..........the drop in comb is almost non existent, the straight stock type design causes the gun to kick straight back like a mule and recoil was much more noticeable then any other rifle in the same chambering. I got one in a 7 mag for work, gave it back and offered to supply my own rifle, I figured if I had to shoot something I wanted something that wasn't going to hurt me more then what was on the other side of the muzzle. Take all of that with a grain of salt if you wish, but more importantly purchase a rifle that actually fits you, it makes shooting it more enjoyable. Ever wonder why shot gunners have their shotguns fit to them? because we are all not built the same....and shot gunning is basically instinctive shooting, well so is shooting a rifle, just sometimes the scope gets in the way.
If it doesn't feel comfortable in your hands and on your shoulder how is it your ever going to be able to use it to your advantage???
 
I am interested in the new Sako A7 Roughtech Pro in 7mag. They are a Cabelas exclusive until next year and them other retailers will have them. I would like to check one out and get a close look at it but unfortunately Calgary doesn't have a Cabelas yet. I will have to wait a couple months I guess until the other stores get them. No rush I have enough rifles to make it through this hunting season!
Has anybody had there hands on a Roughtech yet?
If so, what did you think?
 
I traded for a A7 in 270 last winter.

I fitted a Zeiss Z600 on it and sighted it in with Federal 130gr.
I don't even know what groups it shoots and neither do I care. At the range it groups well.

On Monday evening with 15 mins of legal light I shot a deer at 320m, sitting, with a shooting stick. Bang flop and didn't twitch.

Had it ranged ahead of time and then confirmed with SPOT/google maps the exact spot where I field-dressed the deer. So I am pretty sure about the distance.
That is a long shot for me, rarely have I shot a deer over 200m. This was an open farmer's field though.

I really like this rifle and don't think I'll ever let her go.

Your mileage may vary.

And, yes, 270win (and 30-06) are obviously long actions. Not knowing that doesn't really qualify you to write "reviews".
 
My a7 in 7mm shoots sub moa as well, if yours doesn't I would have to question what is going on with ammo?optics? I am considering selling mine but only to get a sako 85.
 
Thank you for the link.

That link is exactly what I did look up previous to my purchase. It states that S,M /2.9kg (6 3/8 lbs). That would be short and medium actions. .270win is a medium action.

The it states S,M Mag 3.0kg (6 5/8 lbs). That would be for short and medium magnums. Like 7mm WSM and .300 win mag.

So the PDF you provided from Sako states that the medium action rifles will weigh 6 3/8 lbs. but they do not in fact weight that. They do in fact weigh 6 5/8 lbs, but the PDF you provided does not state that.

Thank you for helping me prove my point


.270 Win is a long action cartridge, not only by Sako's definition either. .308 sized cartridge is a short action, so are WSMs but Sako calls them medium. A true medium action length cartridge is a 7mm Mauser. Anything .270 length is a long action, some companies long action can fit a .375 H&H length cartridge (Rem 700, Win 70), some cannot(Ruger m77). A magnum length action can fit .416 Rigby ect (Ruger RSM, CZ 550.)

Action size (short, long, magnum) has everything to do with cartridge length. The .270 Win, being based off the .30-06 and just as long as the 7mm RM and other "magnums," is by all definition a long action cartridge. So why get snooty with the guy when you can't read the spec sheet properly??

As for the A7 I've never been a fan. Just like the Tikkas they have way too much plastic for me. For a couple more brown ones you could get a Montana that is lighter, has a better stock and no plastic parts.
 
Last edited:
There is a thread on A7 free float :
http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/1120972-Free-float-A7-(Group-Therapy)-Fixed!

Personally, I did not removed the points of contact and I don't know if I'm gonna do it because mine shoots very well.
My A7 .270win will shoot around 1 inch or less / 3 shots group at 100y with pretty much every ammo.
My range targets are also posted in the link above.
Mine really like Hornady ammunition, especially the Superformance.

I really like mine, solid, well built, the stock feel really solid, its not really light but its well balanced.
The only thing I will upgrade in the future is the scope bases, aluminium bolt shroud and maybe the buttpad.



 
This response ain't much better.....

OP never said he used $20 ammo, and actually indicates he was ready to try some handloads. Plus the Sako guarantee states "factory ammo" for 5 shot 1moa. Sako says right in the Warranty, anything other than factory loaded ammo voids the warranty.
I agree the best results will come from Handloading though

Well sorry I needed to assume it was crap ammo, because every A7 I have seen using reloads or at least premium ammo does shoot MOA. And yes SAKO does say factory ammo. Read the fine print.... there factory ammo. Which is premium ammo. To expect a rifle to shoot sub MOA with ammo that has massive variances in seating depth, powder, brass lengths, poor BC bullets is stupid. The most accurate rifle on the planet, will not shoot sub MOA if you have bullets that have variances. That's just common sense. Your gun is nothing more then a pipe, what flies out the pipe has much more to do with accuracy. I have taken cheap Savage Axis and got them shooting sub MOA. With a ton of load testing etc. A good rifle will just tighten those groups up even more is all.
 
very cheaply made rifle
Hello all,
I thought some people may benefit from a review of the rifle I recently bought, the Sako A7.

First a bit about myself, since I haven't been very active on this site lately: I've been hunting and shooting from a young age. I'm now more middle-aged than young-aged. I have a collection of about 20 hunting rifles. I like light rifles and I reload my own shells rather hot. I don't mind the recoil.

I decided that I needed another stainless and synthetic rifle to hunt deer in bad weather. After some looking around and deliberating I bought the A7 in .270win from Cabela's in Edmonton. I got the package with the silver scope, but only because they didn't have an A7 that wasn't part of a package. The salesperson and Sako's website said the rifle alone weighs 6 3/8 pounds. So, that would be 6lbs 6oz. Seems like a reasonably light rifle. The scope was listed online to be 14oz, so with bases and rings it would be just under 7.5lbs. Not an ultralight, but seemed good, so I bought it.

I liked the rubberized finish on the stock, and the palm swell. The bolt felt good, and the trigger is nicely adjustable. I was happy, but it felt a little bit heavier than I thought it should. So I weighed it on a quite accurate digital scale. It was 6oz heavier than it was supposed to be. I took off the scope and weighed it again. 6lb 12oz. That's 6 oz too heavy. I tried a different scale. No change. 6 oz too heavy. I called Cabelas and said this rifle is too heavy, I want an exchange. Not happening. All firearms sales are final unless they are defective. I said this rifle is defective because it's half a pound heavier than I was told and was advertised.
Not happening.
So I called Stoeger Canada, but all I've managed to do is leave several messages. No response back.

So I put on a Leupold vxII 3-9x33 ultralight. This has made the rifle-scope combo weigh 7.5 lbs exactly. Just what I was expecting. I'm sacrificing a bit with light capture with this scope, but oh well.

I took the rifle to the range, and after trying 3 different types of ammunition I've yet to shoot a 3 shot 1moa group at 100 yards. I haven't given up yet, but I am a little curious about the 5 shot moa guarantee that is advertised. After all, they lied about the weight. Perhaps they lied about the accuracy too.

So, like I said, I've not given up on this rifle yet. I've loaded up a couple different loads, and hope to test them soon. The rifle could still be a shooter. But it's not proving to be an "out of the box tack driver" like I hoped.

Overall, I wish I didn't buy it. I recommend against it. It's half a pound heavier than advertised and so far is not as accurate as advertised.

Just thought others may be interested in this information.

Huntin' Gun
 
Huntin' Gun - if you don't get any satisfaction from Cabela's Or Stoegar Canada just put your A7 on the EE for a good price. I'm sure someone will bite.

My buddy has one - seems like a nice gun and he's satisfied. I did like the feel of the stock and seemed to shoulder fine for me. Haven't fired it though.
 
Huntin' Gun - if you don't get any satisfaction from Cabela's Or Stoegar Canada just put your A7 on the EE for a good price. I'm sure someone will bite.

My buddy has one - seems like a nice gun and he's satisfied. I did like the feel of the stock and seemed to shoulder fine for me. Haven't fired it though.

Why would Stoeger or Cabelas help him out? His demand for an exchange as a defective rifle was before he took it to the range and based solely on the weight of the rifle. Which as it turns out is almost exactly what its supposed to be. If it does turn out to be a crappy shooter then maybe they should do something, but that wasn't the issue he was demanding an exchange for.
 
Back
Top Bottom