Savage Alaskan Brush Hunter in .375 Ruger - who's got one?

Jeff/1911

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
964   0   0
Location
Edmonton
Hi Folks,

Just wondered if anyone here has had a chance to see one of these up close, or fire one? I see Frontier had them listed, but are now out of stock. Somebody must have got one, right? :rolleyes:

http://www.savagearms.com/firearms/model/116ALASKANBRUSHHUNTER

Jeff/1911.
 
Last edited:
They look decent, almost a direct copy of rugers version with almost the same model name, but in the bigger picture it shouldnt hurt ruger any, as long as it puts the .375 ruger caliber in another rifle.

I wonder how much they cost and if they will come in a lefty?

edit: $589 for a stainless in 338 WM! not bad at all!
 
I had a chance to handle one in Cabela's Winnipeg a few weeks ago. I liked it well enough that my old Ruger 77 stainless, wearing a Hogue stock, is under the knife as we speak, having the barrel shortened and sights installed.

I like short, handy hunting rifles.
 
I handled one not to long ago nice rifle for a cheaper savage I almost bought it I can honestly say the only thing I'd do to it is finish where savage left off and touch up the stock.
 
There is also the Hog hunter which is even cheaper without the accustock, and with a threaded 20 inch barrel.

Comes in .223, .308, and .338 Win Mag.

I can't justify buyin another gun I can't shoot, and .375 Ruger is an expensive proposition, as is the .338 Win Mag.

The .308 just seems more versatile, and I can actually put rounds downrange without selling myself on the street to pay for it.
 
I've handled one, quite like it for the price. A McMillan on it would be a great addition. Love live the king!
 
If you can afford the McMillan, you can afford to put it on a Ruger or a CZ.

For the guy who needs more power then he can squeeze out of his .30/06, the .375 Ruger is a great option. Savage has made that option viable for those who can't justify the purchase of a more expensive rifle. But a McMillan on a Savage ABH?? Really? A guy might as well top it off with a set of NECG sights, a Nightforce scope in Near's Alpha Hunter rings, and a bake on finish. Oh, and don't forget the Pelican case.
 
If you can afford the McMillan, you can afford to put it on a Ruger or a CZ.

For the guy who needs more power then he can squeeze out of his .30/06, the .375 Ruger is a great option. Savage has made that option viable for those who can't justify the purchase of a more expensive rifle. But a McMillan on a Savage ABH?? Really? A guy might as well top it off with a set of NECG sights, a Nightforce scope in Near's Alpha Hunter rings, and a bake on finish. Oh, and don't forget the Pelican case.

Too bad Roger and CZ don't make a 18.5 inch stainless model. 20 inches only on the M77 Alaskan I believe.;)

But for a cheap synthetic stock the Accustock is not bad at all.
 
Don't have one ,but would like one.

Seems to be a nice bit of kit for the price,... on paper anyway.

A local dealer has a Savage shipment due in and hopefully one will be in it to handle. Guy at the counter said one was in 338WM, but couldn't confirm a Brush Hunter. If this rifle handles and feels as good as it looks on the Savage site, it should get a following.
 
Fired one in .375 Ruger at Colby as a guest shooter of a friend.
He had "partridge loads" made up with lead bullets from Bullet Barn (BC) and 15 grains of Red Dot pistol powder.
That thing is really accurate and a girl like me who weighs less than 130 pounds soaking wet found it unwieldy but quite manageable with the light loads.
He then fired some full power loads and offered me a shot using them.
Thanks but no thanks was my reply.
The muzzle blast was like the 4th of July celebration right up close and personal.
 
Too bad Roger and CZ don't make a 18.5 inch stainless model. 20 inches only on the M77 Alaskan I believe.;)

But for a cheap synthetic stock the Accustock is not bad at all.

The Savage model 116 "Alaskan Brush Hunter" has an 18" barrel and Accutrigger but doesn't have Accustock.
The gun is offered in 338 Win and 375 Ruger.
They are very scarce if non-existent in Canada right now.
I fired one in 375 Ruger a friend of mine owns as a guest shooter at Shooter's Choice in Waterloo with watered down hand loads.
It is a nice shooting and handling gun but for someone who weighs less than 130 pounds I'd pick one in 338 Winchester.
 
I saw something on a Savage bolt gun a couple of weeks ago that gave me pause. A pal of mine had his HB target model, at the range, and it was misfiring. There was absolutely no firing pin mark on the primers. Hmm, okay, give me the bolt, I'll take it home and run it through the ultrasonic, maybe its gummed up inside. I've never stripped a Savage bolt before and found it to be a straight forward affair. But the steel seemed prone to rust, on recesses on the bolt body, which doesn't matter, and around the edge of the bolt face which could, but the build up was cosmetic in nature and certainly didn't cause the problem. The firing pin and spring were shiny and clean and free of any sign of corrosion or any old grease, dust or dirt which might have impacted negatively upon its reliability.

What I did find was a potential for trouble that for me would take the Savage off the table as a wilderness protection rifle. At the front of the bolt body is a blued cross pin which floats freely in the hole drilled through the bolt body. There is a small hole drilled through this pin, which the firing pin passes through, and so the firing pin is intended to keep the cross pin in place. In the case of my pal's rifle, the blueing was worn from one side of the firing pin, suggesting that the cross pin had moved slightly out of line, and that the friction this created was enough to rob enough energy from the firing pin strike, that the rifle wouldn't fire. I got it cleaned up, put a skim of Lubriplate on the firing pin, and the cross bolt, and got it back to him.

I know there are many Savage enthusiasts out there, who are going to say that they have never experienced a problem with their rifles, and that's great. On the range or for a few days in the woods deer hunting each season, a rifle isn't typically exposed to harsh conditions, and regular maintenance will keep it in good condition and working in a trouble free manner. But Savage has marketed the Alaskan Bush Rifle as a low cost wilderness hunting and protection rifle. Given the challenging conditions of wilderness work, the logic of choosing a low cost rifle is not without merit. But these rifles can be exposed to pretty tough conditions for weeks at at time. While the knowledgeable gun owner does what he can to prevent rust and undue damage to his rifle, there are quite a few working in the back country who need a rifle but aren't enthusiasts by any stretch, and are not prone to giving their rifles and special consideration. These are going to be the guys who'll probably choose the Savage, and won't be reading this in anyway.

In the case of the Savage bolt, the potential for problems occuring under harsh conditions as a result of that free floating cross pin being out of position could prove very serious. If I carried one, I would make a point of stripping that bolt every night, wiping it clean and relubing it. Even so, if you are out in freezing rain turning to snow, and that cross pin freezes in place by low temperature or from a light skim of rust while exerting pressure to one side of the firing pin, you could be in trouble if you need that rifle to save you. "Not likely!" says you. Well the day my pal's rifle wouldn't work it was sunny and 20 degrees, and his rifle was in good maintained condition. Today its -6, warming up to zero with a chance of freezing rain and snow; how confident do you think I'd be packing a Savage bolt gun? So when you see me out out on the coast doing bear work, I'll be packing a rifle made by Brno, Winchester, Mauser, or Ruger.
 
I have 4 Savage bolt rifles in various calibers (2 blue and 2 SS) and have sat on tree stands in frigid weather for hours and hunted in freezing rain conditions and never had a jam, misfire or a problem with reliability. One is over 20 years old and is my favorite deer stand gun.
I have taken deer, elk and a couple of Canadian moose with Savage bolt actions.
Many brands of guns have fan clubs including Savage.
But it seems that Savage is the only brand with a very savage anti-fan club.
People will dissect a Savage rifle down to the nuts, bolts and screws to find fault with it.
Of course Rugers, Winchesters, Sakos, Tikkas, T/Cs, Marlins, Pedersolis, Chiappas, Henrys, Mossbergs don't have parts that will rust, wear or freeze up in cold, wet weather conditions if not properly cared for.
And I can't forget to mention before someone beats me to it that Savage bolt actions are absolutely worthless cause they don't have CRF (controlled round feeding).
I apologize in advance for the Savage Arms Company cause they can box a rifle that is accurate and dependable and you don't have to take out a second mortgage on the house to pay for it.
Savage - YUK! You must remember the Savage model 99 lever action - what a piece of junk - it would of course have to be cause it's a Savage.
Give me a friggin break! :rolleyes:
 
I don't have a hate on for Savage rifles, and I would happily build a match rifle on a Savage bolt gun, but I won't choose one for protection. That said, as you correctly point out, all maufactureres have had their problems from time to time, and the reliability of a particular rifle is more important than is the choice of any particur brand. I would sooner have a Savage 99 chambered for .375-284 than an Alaskan Bush Rifle chambered in .375 Ruger, not becasue I have a problem with the Savage brand, and not becasue I believe the .375 Ruger, is or is not, the King, but because the 99 was, and continues to be, a proven and reliable platform, for extended wilderness use. Ignoring a potential problem because you happen to like a particular manufacturer makes about as much sense as being part of a hate club towards that same manufacturer. It just comes down to using a rifle that is appropriate for the job that needs doing.
 
Some rifle designs are better than others, this is just a fact some aren't willing to accept due to their emotional attachment to their choice. Generally older/more expensive designs where compromises haven't been made to reduce manufacturing costs perform better. You don't see many PH's running around in Africa with Savages, there's a reason for that. You want cheap/reliable enough get a Savage, you want dependable spend some more $$$$ and get something with less compromises (Mauser, CZ followed by Winchester, Ruger)
 
Gunslinger;

Are you a PH? Tell us about your experience with "cheap/reliable enough... Savage".

I've owned all mentioned + several others like Sako, Remington, Tikka etc.

Can't say I prefer one over the other as long as they do what's intended for 'em.

One thing I've found: any of them may have "compromises", i.e. flaws or faults... where shall I begin? Nah, it would be a too long history after 50+ years.

One other thing: My Savages have never let me down!

Bob

www.bigbores.ca
 
Back
Top Bottom