flying_scotsman
Regular
Greetings all,
I am looking at refurbing my ’43 Savage No4 Mk1*, and I have a few questions.
The rifle is a matching US built specimen, in good condition except as noted below. I have noticed some Savage-marked parts, and some LB-marked parts, and some parts which seem to be marked with both makers’ marks. Was it common to share parts between Canadian and US factories? If so, which parts were commonly shared?
The forestock is warped, and touches the barrel. The 2 groove barrel is worn and pitted. These two items are the focus of the refurb. The only markings on the barrel are what appears to be an incomplete C on the left side of the barrel at the chamber end, and the Savage S behind the front sight. Would a LB barrel be considered correct, or should I try to find a Savage? I don’t have a LB barrel to compare; what marks would be present?
Looking around online, I haven’t found much in the way of No4 parts. Are there any good sources out there, aside from watching the EE?
I am looking at refurbing my ’43 Savage No4 Mk1*, and I have a few questions.
The rifle is a matching US built specimen, in good condition except as noted below. I have noticed some Savage-marked parts, and some LB-marked parts, and some parts which seem to be marked with both makers’ marks. Was it common to share parts between Canadian and US factories? If so, which parts were commonly shared?
The forestock is warped, and touches the barrel. The 2 groove barrel is worn and pitted. These two items are the focus of the refurb. The only markings on the barrel are what appears to be an incomplete C on the left side of the barrel at the chamber end, and the Savage S behind the front sight. Would a LB barrel be considered correct, or should I try to find a Savage? I don’t have a LB barrel to compare; what marks would be present?
Looking around online, I haven’t found much in the way of No4 parts. Are there any good sources out there, aside from watching the EE?


















































