Savage Scout 7.62X39 Report plus PICS

madtrapper143

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
302   0   1
Gentlemen, just brought home a Savage Scout in 7.62X39. I chose it over a CZ 527 just because of the sighting system. Any one else have one? I will complete a range report and add some pics soon. I suspect CTC will assist. Strange but the Savage web site says the mag holds 4 rounds but there is no way in hell that 4 rounds can be forced into that mag just 3. I am OK with that I always load my rifles with 3 rounds just like my shotguns. Habit I guess....

Darryl

Well CTC and I got out to our makeshift range early this morning. The cool days of late summer are upon us in in the Great North West. I stripped the Scout of the sights and the EER rail mount. I found the open ghost ring, while an excellent sight was not the best for my aging eyes and the cost of of EER scopes closed that idea also.

I scoped the little rifle with Burris Tactical two piece mounts, Weaver steel rings and a Jap Bushnell fixed 4 I had in the parts bin.

Ammo to be tested was, Igman Factory 123 SP (.310), Prvi Factory 123 SP (.310) and three handloads. #1: Speer 150 gr SP (for .30-30, dia.308)#2: Hornady 150 PSP .308 diam #3: 123 grain Speer Hot Cor .310 dia. All loads were made at manual max loadings. I used RE7 and H4198 as powder.

Here are the pics.

Using my old camping table,not real steady but OK for our part of the country.

SavageScout008.jpg


The Scout configured the way I like it.....

SavageScout002.jpg


The Igman and Prvi ammo

SavageScout003.jpg



The Range.

SavageScout001.jpg


The reloads in .308 Diametre. Top Hornady, botton Speer.

SavageScout005.jpg


First target to get it on the paper (25 yards)

SavageScout010.jpg


75 yard target (range is too short) with 123grain hanload speer hot core .310

SavageScout017.jpg


CTC's view of the stringent testing.....

SavageScout013.jpg


As you can see the test was informal. I found the following, the rifle is very capable of MOA groups BUT it would require a better bench and probably a better shooter. The rifle is more than adequate for deer and bear with both the .308 dia and .310 dia bullets factory and handloads. NOTE: the Speer 150 grain bullets (for .30 WCF) did not feed well because of the bullet profile all others ran perfect. The rifle did shoot the .308 bullets into tighter groups than the .310. (about 20%) I tried some 250 yard plus shots at a small plant mound a way up the pit and the 123 grain stuff hit dead on and the 150 grain handloads dropped about 6 to 8 inches. (zeroed at 100 + or -)

Overall: I like the little rifle. It is short, stout (thanks to the accu Stock) nice trigger (accu trigger) and performed with no issues. It is about the perfect woods wandering rifle for the country I hunt. For fear of causing an uprising I would not hesitate to shoot a deer, bear or moose with this gun in my hunting areas.( long shot = 150 yards)

I think the old Bushnell in 4 power is about right for the task at hand. You can get a better scope if you want but's that's what I had. The Burris tactical bases are very good and offered lot's of scope postioning options. (they are like a two piece picatinny rail)

I think Savage built a rifle that I am glad I own. Can't wait till big game season.

regards, Darryl

P.S. the mag can only hold 3 rounds because the block at the rear reduces the height of the stacking in the mag from 4 to 3.
 
Last edited:
I have the CZ Carbine, alot lighter than the Savage, but you are right the sighting system is way superior on the Savage. Might bye a Savage and nock off the barrel and put a heay barrel on it for long range paper shooter, cheers Dale Z!
 
I am very interested in the report.
I was dead set on the Ruger Scout but the Savage has my interest. The 2 common knocks on it are that the rear sight and rail are 'flimsier' than the Ruger. Your feelings on this?

Is the stock the standard plastic non-accustock like they put on the package rifles or is it better quality (havent handled one yet)?
 
I have no intention of using a forward mounted scope. The base is (was) a no name branded solid enough unit. I had a B Square base from my first savage scout I bought 10 years ago. That is on the gun now ( just for now). The rear sight is a Williams WGRS style peep. Not steel but I have used this same sight on various other rifles over the years with no complaint. Like anything if you hit it hard enough with a hammer it will break. The rifle sits in Savage's Acccu Stock nothing flimsy about that. It does have an Accu trigger system as well. As much as the CZ was a beauty the Savage really out classed it with it's features. The groove diameter (bore ?) is .308 NOT .310. Savage seems to feel that all 7.62x39 loads can be fired in it. Must be, because you know some guys will shoot mil surp in these guns. I am going to try some 123 grain .310 handloads and some 150 grain .308 handloads and see how they stack up. When you handle one you will note how solid this rifle is. Perfect for the argo, canoe, tundra even the Super Duty. Report coming soon.
Darryl
 
i have one but in 308! its a great gun, what made me choose the savage over the riger is the all steel construction besides the stock. even the mag is made out of all steel! i get about 1 inch groups at 100 yards with barnes 168 gr ttsx and the same with federal nosler partitions! it goes up to about 2.5 inch groups with win white box and AE 150 gr. the only real issue i have with the gun is its weight, it weighs just over 8 lbs with a weaver k4 scout scope and rings. but thats a minor set back. i am able to hit 5x6 inch targets at 220 yards all day long with cheapo win white box! in my savage the mag holds 4 rounds? thats weard it dosnt hold thta in yours? heres a pic of mine.

IMG_0075.jpg
[/IMG]
 
I tried the Scout out this morning. My eyes are not up to the Williams peep set up. I shot OK but I would not evaluate the rifle's accuracy with the sight picture I had. The rifle handled .308" 150 grain reloads and Prvi 123 grain .310" rounds with no issues. With the weight and Savages' new style pad it was like shooting a .22 mag. Savage has added a spacer in the mag and shortened the bolt travel to accomodate the 7.62X39 round. Bolt throw is short and can be worked VERY quickly. I am going to get a set of weaver bases and mount a scope in the conventional manner. Then I can wring out the accuracy for the official report. Overall a real cool little rifle. I purchased the Scout at my favourite gun shop in Thunder Bay. (PM for name) The gun was not cheap nearly 800.00 before tax.

Darryl
 
I tried the Scout out this morning. My eyes are not up to the Williams peep set up. I shot OK but I would not evaluate the rifle's accuracy with the sight picture I had. The rifle handled .308" 150 grain reloads and Prvi 123 grain .310" rounds with no issues. With the weight and Savages' new style pad it was like shooting a .22 mag. Savage has added a spacer in the mag and shortened the bolt travel to accomodate the 7.62X39 round. Bolt throw is short and can be worked VERY quickly. I am going to get a set of weaver bases and mount a scope in the conventional manner. Then I can wring out the accuracy for the official report. Overall a real cool little rifle. I purchased the Scout at my favourite gun shop in Thunder Bay. (PM for name) The gun was not cheap nearly 800.00 before tax.

Darryl

wow 800 bucks? i only payed 700 shipped for mine. i got a deal! did you try using the gost ring sight or just the peep sight?
 
I apologize for the untidy scrawl of my writing on the target. I also want to make it clear that accuracy found in my groups shouldn't be taken as the full potential of the rifle. When I shot my group, I waited until MD143 had turned away and actually shot at 25 instead of his posted 75...I figured that was the only way I could actually be on paper.

Cory
 
Back
Top Bottom