blasted_saber
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- A blue part of Ontario
My grandfather has one. Its his favourite rifle for pushing a swamp for deer. Compact and light and a bolt action.
I think what you had there was either a model 40 (uncheckered) or a model 45 (checkered). They were only made in 30-06, 30-30, 250 Sav and 300 Sav. The 340's only came in one of those calibers (30-30).![]()
For the life of me, I cannot understand why anyone would want one of these rifles?
More than that, why would someone pay $300+ for a used one, when there are so many better choices out there for the same or very little more brand new?
For instance, why would you pay $300, used, for a 340 in 30-30, when you can buy a Stevens 200, new, in any caliber you want for $350.
And, yes, I have owned a 340, a 30-30, and shot two more, a 222 and a 225.
Fire away, my brothers!
Ted
A Savage 99 in 30/30 is pretty cool as well.
One reason, Ted, is that some folks really, really want a .30-30 bolt rifle, not something newer or flatter-shooting. Myself, I'd rather have back the 340 I sold than to have a brand new cheap rifle in any other chambering. I am a huge .30-30 fan myself. And they may want to own a classic rifle, which, though homely, the .340 is.
I'd go close to 300 for a very good example with a decent scope. Unscoped, yup, about 200 bucks.
To go a little further into your original question about why anyone would want one?
.30-30 cartridge: Excellent balance of killing power and recoil, ammo cheap and available, easy to reload, pointy bullets available as components or ammo, easy on the shoulder, historic cartridge well proven.....
Rifle: greater range than bow or spear. Easy to learn to use.
Savage 340: Plain but serviceable. Mine was MOA accurate with handloads (using a 3-9X32 scope). Detachable mag for those who like them, myself included. Inexpensive when new, still generally cheap, though often overpriced IN THE EE.
As I said, I wish I had kept mine, happy though I am with the Marlin 336 I traded it towards.
340s came in 222, 223, 25 win, and 3030
variants also came in 22 hornet
I just got a 222 savage 340... seems like a decent little old rifle
Well Ted we quite often disagree on things but you hit the nail right on the head with the Sav-Stevens bolt gun. I heard how wonderfull they were a few yrs back, what with beong able to use pointy bullets an all. I got a chance to aquire one of those fine machines & so I did.
Yes you can use pointy bullets in the 30-30
But you have to seat them so damm'd deep to go thru the mag the bullet is already tappering inside the case by the time it gets seated
The actions are rough, sticky, course, unfinished the only smooth spot on the rifle is the butt stock.
& accuracy proved no hell either....course some-one will jump in with a 2" group at a thousand yards or so, other people always get mini fraction groups while the rest of us are always wondering why we got such crappy guns
Yet all aside they would make a good first timer deer rifle, if they were priced right.
& the Model 340 ain't much better.
Bud showd me one day how well his .223 shot groups at 100yds.
Yes very nice...all would have hit a small pizza sized target![]()
I was unaware that the 340 came in .223??? Because I thought the bolt and action liked rimmed cartridges. (222,30-30,)
Was your friends gun scoped? Using ammo the gun liked? Is he visually impaired? Cause my 340 can group .90" using my lead sled and a burris scope. (3-9x40) ..............of course it will only do this with one type of ammo, EVERYTHING else I have fed it using factory ammo shot 2" or more.
Many years from now the Stevens 200 will be thought of by many as the cheapest piece of trash ever made....and the 340 will still be a very affordable classic.