Scope for Marlin 30-30, sub MOA rifle

Slaymoar

Regular
Rating - 100%
15   0   0
Location
Ontario
I have a max budget of $400 + tax, however I would appreciate spending less.

I have been interested in the Monarch 3 2-8x40mm @ under $300 (wicked glass for price), and now I am looking at the Leupold VX-1 and VX-2 at ~$300 and just under $400.

Hunting mostly in bushes under 100 yards. I want to be capable of 200 yard shots on deer, and under 100 yards for moose.

Let me know your input, opinions, experiences etc..

Thanks!
 
Got a Vortex Diamondback 2-7x35 on mine. Mounted on a rail with leupold QRW rings so I can take it off and use iron sights as well.
 
Last edited:
2-8x meets for your hunting requirements.

Many moons back I had nothing but Bushnell Elite scopes and have since migrated to Leupold VX-3s. I am happy with them.

I never warm up to Nikon scopes.
 
Redfield Revolution 2-7x or 3-9
Or as mentioned before vortex diamondback

Both are great scopes for the money. Well under budget, and will do what you are asking for. Use the savings for good bases/rings and ammo.

And both those scopes have lifetime warranty. Not a bad thing to have for a scope mounted on a bush gun.
 
Thanks guys, already looked at the redfields, not sure what people think of their clarity though.. Looked at some scopes again today and I think I'm going for a Vortex Viper 3-9x40. It showed more definition at long distance than the VX-2, and the diamondback was as clear as the viper in the center, but a bit blurry on the edges. The Viper has a super solid click system and seems like a winner. The picture on it was nice and big too.

The only thing is that I'm not sure if I should get a 3-9 scope for a brush gun.. There is a 2.5-10 viper for a lot more money, but I don't want to spend over $400.

Choosing a scope is way harder than I thought.
 
I just really wish there was a 2-7 viper. It was discontinued so chances of one being in stock somewhere are slim.. Is the VX-2 decent in low light?
 
Back
Top Bottom