Scope mounts

I bought my SPUHR mount for a build which changed directions before it was delivered. Nice but I never would have purchased it otherwise.
 
I've never used the Spuhr rings, so I can't comment on them. But I have 2 of Richard's mounts. IMHO, they are akin to works of art in their precision. Here's a pic of one of them on my Coyote.

eivJ8ftl.jpg
 
uncledillers said:
Can anyone tell me how they justify the cost of spuhr rings over say Near Rings? Looking for an actual answer, not tying to be a jerk
Click to expand...

The Spuhr rings have a built in bubble level (which is about $100) and if you have a TRG or AI AW you can direct mount them which saves the cost of a picatinny rail (another $100ish).

I have a Near Alphamount and it is awesome but will be going with a Spuhr for my TRG. The cost of the Spuhr works to about the same as a rail and mount from Near. The Spuhr mount will keep the TRG into euro goodness.
 
uncledillers said:
Can anyone tell me how they justify the cost of spuhr rings over say Near Rings? Looking for an actual answer, not tying to be a jerk
Click to expand...
features, for me it is the built in level, unobstructed view of turrets for making adjustments while keeping your head on the rifle in the shooting position and the built in scope leveling system which guarantees the scope is level with the mount.

Aesthetically, I also prefer the finish quality of the Spuhr over the near but that is subjective
 
I'm new here, but I thought I'd share. I've had good luck with Millett Tactical rings on my 6.5 Lapua, Tikka .308's, and rimfires. Initially, I'll admit, I bought them because they looked "cool", and were a reasonable price. They need a bit of lapping, but that's OK. I had to resort to Amazon to find the low ones, so I bought 3 sets!!

Having said that, I have a set of ATRS sitting empty on my .338 waiting for an ATACR to live in them.

-J.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom