Win/64 said:Thing is ya don't have problems with the Bushnell.
Win/64 said:Leupolds cost to much.
Win/64 said:Thing is ya don't have problems with the Bushnell. Seems this whole post has been about warranty and not about optics. If you Leupold owner's are so aware of warranties - you've had to use them more often. P.S. Leupolds cost to much.
BIGREDD said:I have had to send back a Burris Fullfield II 3-9 last year.... still waiting... not impressed!
riden said:I am arguing.
My buddy has a VX 1, and he is a real jerk, and he even admits my Fullfield is brighter.
I own 3 Fullields, no issues at all.
hutchster said:i currently have a b&l 3000 3-9 and its ok, but i did look at replacing it a while back and compared an elite 3200 and vx-1, both in 3-9x40 at a local shop.
the difference was quite noticable in favor of the vx-1.
i'm no expert, so take this with a grain of salt.
i was glassing a storage shed about 75 yards from the shop, and with the leopold i could actually make out the ridges of the wood siding, with the 3200 you could tell it was siding, but you couldn't make out the pattern.
i assume that this signifies a clarity and brightness difference?
btw, i was comparing them both at the same power range thru out the viewing.
or maybe i'm just on crack!
hutchster out![]()
BCWILL said:BUY the Leo VX II 3-9x40 and Be Happy![]()
Or buy the Bushnell 3200save some dollars initially but eventually you'll sell it for 1/2 of what you paid and buy the Leupold anyways.
So Spend your Money Once and go Get the Darn Leo !![]()