I would recommend the Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40, as well. The only thing stopping me, is that I've got a buddy who has a Burris FFII 3-9x40 sitting on his .338 Ruger MKII that has been on top of that rifle for HUNDREDS if not thousands of rounds. I've witnessed much of the shooting that has been done with this rifle/scope combo. The only thing keeping me from recommending the Zeiss (which is AWESOME), is that I've also got some Burris FFII 3-9x40 scopes as well as Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40 scopes. I am HARD pressed to notice a difference in clarity or brightness between the two during full daylight or twilight, and the Burris is tough as nails, as is the Zeiss. The Burris costs half what the Zeiss does. The only thing that the Zeiss might do a bit better, is warranty service, although that is just according to what others have reported. I've only had to use Burris CS once, and the experience was completely satisfactory and pleasant. The adjustments on the Zeiss are more crisp and clean, too, but the Burris scopes that I have have been every bit as reliable in tracking, holding zero, and RTZ as the Zeiss have. The measured eye relief of most of my Burris FFII 3-9x40 scopes is 3.5-3.8", and the Zeiss measures at a constant 4". My buddy has had no problems with eye relief with his Burris on his .338WM.
The Zeiss is a GREAT scope, and I love mine, but so is the Burris. I'll repeat that the Burris is half the price, or less.