Scorpion optics

For the same money, Leupold used.

Bought one for a rimfire and the + hairs were too thick.

On the same note, looked at a 4x, then the 3-9.
The four was much more clear.
At a gun show there was a table displaying these buggy kritters.
Did the same test.
The 3-9 was more clear than the 4x.
When things don't add up, well it don't add up.
 
For the same money, Leupold used.

Bought one for a rimfire and the + hairs were too thick.

On the same note, looked at a 4x, then the 3-9.
The four was much more clear.
At a gun show there was a table displaying these buggy kritters.
Did the same test.
The 3-9 was more clear than the 4x.
When things don't add up, well it don't add up.

So not good then
 
I have a couple of them and for the cost they're a decent scope. Only tried them on 22's but they worked good. As mentioned above they do have thick cross hairs though. I bought one and won the other in a shoot a couple years ago. Had one on my marlin 60 and was able to shoot 4 of 6 5 shot groups at 50 yds under 1/2" and the other 2 under 3/4". No doubt their not a Leupold or Nikon or any other high end scope by any means but at the time of buying I was on a pretty tight budget and really can't complain about them.
IMG_20170207_143951.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]
IMG_20170211_140030.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]
 
Last edited:
We carry most available makes of scopes but Scorpion has not fit in with price point or quality compared to what else is available so we don't carry it. Phil.
 
I had a compact 3-9x32. Worst scope I've ever owned and not even close to the cheapest. Could focus the crosshairs or the image but never both. Didn't matter if it was 3x or 9x
 
I was talking to a retailer who carried them, and she said the return policy is great and they are really easy to deal with..... which to me, sounded like they deal with a LOT of returns. Also, the ones I handled seemed overly heavy and clunky.
 
Back
Top Bottom