You're right, there's almost 1/8" of travel on mine before the hammer drops off the edge of the sear, but picture that nice clean edge being rounded off from lots and lots of trigger pulls, y'know? I dunno how much it would wear in a typical lifetime (1000, 2000, 3000+ rounds?), but the bluing would surely be gone and the mating surfaces lapped/burnished to match each other's profile, don't you think? I'm just speculating (aka; talking out of my ass!!), basically I haven't got a clue why mr. gunnoob's trigger is extra sensitive, it could be one of many things.prosper said:The sear has a LOT of travel, and a heavy spring. Polish will smooth it, and possibly lighten it some, but I'd suspect you've either got a trigger job done, or some debris wedged in there somewhere.
I've played around inside the trigger assembly, and don't see how wear could account for it. There's a LOT of material in there.
gunnoob said:I'm going to make it smoother than an HK Mark 23
Sound advice, for sure. If you read through this thread (sks trigger job) you'll get a better picture of what's involved with a trigger job and what the risks are, it's definetely not something you just wanna start hacking at (ask michealsabre about his trigger job experience!). You could also try sending your trigger group across the border to Kivaari for a full-meal-deal trigger job, it costs $50 US but it's apparently well worth it, and then you can feel confident that your trigger is truly safe and done right. Just a suggestionArdent said:You'd be well advised to have a gunsmith do this rather than bubba it yourself.
Norcyaddict762 said:Steel core ammo. ie) Czech surplus M43 ... AP ammo it is not!!
Sounds like you are shooting non-military ammo as the gun goes off too easily. Soft primers me thinks.. Czech military won't do this.
I've wondered about this before, from a physics perspective. Wouldn't steel projectiles do less damage than lead projectiles, due to the difference in density and the harder (read; inelastic) nature of steel? Steel being less dense would not be able to retain as much energy as lead, and when impact occurs the inelastic nature of steel would not allow it to transfer its energy to the target (the backstop, in this case). It would ricochet instead, like the physics demonstration of two billiard balls hitting each other, representing an inelastic collision. Lead on the other hand is roughly twice as dense (11.something grams/ml) as steel and much softer and more malleable, therefore even a FMJ lead core bullet would smush and deform when impacting a hard concrete backstop and transfer more energy, causing greater backstop erosion (while still probably retaining enough energy to ricochet, just not as bad as steel). Am I completely off-base here? I would imagine some parallels may be drawn between shotgun pellet materials (like bismuth, bronze, tungsten, etc) and rifle bullet materials, just scale up the shotgun pellet characteristics to provide a picture of what a 7.62 cal bullet would behave like. Yes/no?prosper said:Some of the less informed ranges refer to all steel cored ammo as 'AP' anyways, and are under the mistaken impression that it will damage the backstop. THIS IS NOT THE CASE. Mild steel will do no more damage than lead. This has been tested before, and steel cores offer no additional penetration. They do however spark pretty impressively, and there is the ricochet hazard
You're describing the SD. But regardless whether you're using a longer steel or shorter lead core (of the same weight) the SD is the same. The only difference is the length of the projectile. The point has the same amount od weight behind it, and thus, the same momentum & energy.poweredbybeer said:I've wondered about this before, from a physics perspective. Wouldn't steel projectiles do less damage than lead projectiles, due to the difference in density
Sure it would. Density aside, the weight is the same, and terefore the energy is toopoweredbybeer said:and the harder (read; inelastic) nature of steel? Steel being less dense would not be able to retain as much energy as lead,
Yep.poweredbybeer said:and when impact occurs the inelastic nature of steel would not allow it to transfer its energy to the target (the backstop, in this case). It would ricochet instead, like the physics demonstration of two billiard balls hitting each other, representing an inelastic collision.
Depending on angle of impact, the difference may be negligable. A steel core at a 90 degree AOI will still deform and transfer 100% of its energy. Plus, not all lead is easily deformable. Hard cast bullets, for example, tend to shatter and ricochet rather easilypoweredbybeer said:Lead on the other hand is roughly twice as dense (11.something grams/ml) as steel and much softer and more malleable, therefore even a FMJ lead core bullet would smush and deform when impacting a hard concrete backstop and transfer more energy,
poweredbybeer said:causing greater backstop erosion (while still probably retaining enough energy to ricochet, just not as bad as steel). Am I completely off-base here? I would imagine some parallels may be drawn between shotgun pellet materials (like bismuth, bronze, tungsten, etc) and rifle bullet materials, just scale up the shotgun pellet characteristics to provide a picture of what a 7.62 cal bullet would behave like. Yes/no?
Lol, good pointprosper said:You're describing the SD. But regardless whether you're using a longer steel or shorter lead core (of the same weight) the SD is the same. The only difference is the length of the projectile. The point has the same amount od weight behind it, and thus, the same momentum & energy.
True 'nuf, mild steel and hard-cast lead are probably roughly similar in hardness/malleability. I don't know what type/grade of steel is used in surplus 7.62x39, and same with the type/grade of lead, so there's no way for me to compare the two. That being said, assuming a mild steel wire core vs. a standard cast lead core of the same weight, I think the steel core would deform less and tend to ricochet more. Not only that, the energy transferred at impact in lead core bullets also tends to melt the lead, does it not? Not that it means anything to the concrete backstopprosper said:Depending on angle of impact, the difference may be negligable. A steel core at a 90 degree AOI will still deform and transfer 100% of its energy. Plus, not all lead is easily deformable. Hard cast bullets, for example, tend to shatter and ricochet rather easily