SFP9 vs P320 vs PPQ?

J

js168

Regular
EE Expired
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Location
Ontario
I have a Norc 1911, CZ SP-01 Shadow, and GP K100 X-Trim. I wanted a M&P9 Pro before, but I'm grad I brought the SP-01 instead. I still want a striker poly pistol (but not a Glock), so now the question is: SFP9 or P320 or PPQ?

I can get the widely available P320 at the IOP price, which makes it $200 less than SFP9 and PPQ, but in the long run I guess that is nothing. The reviews basically say PPQ > VP9 > P320. And for those who owns the P320 or the PPQ, how do they compare to the SP-01 Shadow or the K100 X-Trim?

First world problems...
 
js168 said:
I have a Norc 1911, CZ SP-01 Shadow, and GP K100 X-Trim. I wanted a M&P9 Pro before, but I'm grad I brought the SP-01 instead. I still want a striker poly pistol (but not a Glock), so now the question is: SFP9 or P320 or PPQ?

I can get the widely available P320 at the IOP price, which makes it $200 less than SFP9 and PPQ, but in the long run I guess that is nothing. The reviews basically say PPQ > VP9 > P320. And for those who owns the P320 or the PPQ, how do they compare to the SP-01 Shadow or the K100 X-Trim?

First world problems...
Click to expand...
It's hard comparing a polymer gun to a metal gun like the SP-01. I can't comment on the Grand Power as I've never even seen one.
The SP-01 has probably the best SA trigger on a factory stock gun in my experience. The PPQ has probably the best reset trigger on a polymer gun. Hard to say which is better. Your research on the 3 guns seem to concur with my opinion. I would go with the Q Mk2 if it were me.
 
I have the VP9 - Trigger is amazing. Can't compare it too the PPQ as i've never shot it - But if its better than the VP9 I don't know how much better it could get TBH. Can't go wrong with either one.
 
I have a glock 17 and a p320, I understand you don't want a glock but it has its advantages. Parts availability, easy to maintain, reliable, low bore axis, etc. I upgraded my springs and connector and now the trigger pull is lighter and better. Most reviews rave about reset and trigger pull but that's only relevant for self defence situations. For the vast majority of us we use a pistol for recreational shooting or competition. At the range what matters is accuracy and consistency.

I got the p320 because it was advertised as upgradeable to 45 acp. Which never happened and its expensive to shoot that calibre any ways (sour grape). Most of its interchangeability is useless due to our barrel restrictions. The grip frame is good coz its easy to replace but does not have the grip adaptability. To be honest I wish I didn't get it but its nice looking so I'll keep it.

The PPQ Navy is too long in my opinion but most reviews say the trigger is a tad better than the VP9. In terms of quality I think H&K's are better than Walthers. So In conclusion, I think the VP9 has better grip, looks, feel, quality plus the size is like the glock 19 because of the 106mm barrel.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom