On lets say a single stage, without a turret, how many rounds would be a ball park number per hour, doing it as fast yet as safely as possible?.....
When I first moved to the new digs 6 years ago I was in exactly this situation. My Dillon was buried in a huge stack of boxes that I swore I would not touch until the shop renos were done for fear of being knee deep in "stuff" and not able to work. And stupid me didn't mark that box and set it aside where I could get at it.
What I did find on the edges of the mountain of boxes was the Lee gear I'd been given to start out with. So for myself and a buddy we loaded on a three position Lee manually indexable turret press using a hand primer and a dipper to dole out the powder. What I found was that we were able to load 150 rounds of hand gun ammo per hour starting with clean brass with the spent primers still in the cases. We used a generic 50 round loading tray to hold and work on 50 cases at a time.
The procedure was;
- Size and decap with the first die.
- flare the case mouths with the second die.
- Prime cases with a Lee hand primer.
- Powder up the cases with a dipper measure.
- Check for proper powder level using flashlight to peer into cases.
- Seat and crimp bullets with the third die.
Where we used this turret to advantage was that having all the dies already set and adjusted saved us likely 5 to 7 minutes worth of changing and checking that would be needed for a screw in style single stage press otherwise. But other than that if there is a slower way to load handgun ammo I've yet to see it. So I'd say that 150/hour once you get the hang of it all is about the minimum amount.
Using a Lee Breechlock or a Hornady Lock n' Load single stage with the bayonet style locking bushings would make a single stage press just as fast for this sort of loading as the manually indexed turret press.
Adding things like an adjustable powder drop to the flaring die which typically also holds a powder measure on a turret style press would greatly speed things up even with a single stage press. And a good quality on press primer tool that could be used during the sizing and decapping step would further speed things up. With the right sort of single stage press setup that uses on press priming and on press powder dispensing I can see 200 per hour or maybe a touch more as very possible and safe.
These numbers are for handgun ammo or rifle ammo that is used more for plinking or action shooting. For serious accuracy rifle I'm a big fan of weighing out each charge with a dipper and trickler. And THAT really slows things down. At that point using a single stage sure isn't the big limiting factor for rounds per hour.
Back to the original question..... Share or not.
If the intent is to see the gear move between houses then you had best really know the person well and know that they are the sort that will replace anything that breaks with no encouragement needed. I think that I may be one of the luckier sorts since I can rapidly count off about 10 such folks that I'd trust to do that. But at the same time I also know a lot of others that I would not lend even an old bent spoon.
Another option might be to make the equipment available to your buddy's at a buck per 50 loads being tossed into a jar to help pay back the cost of the gear. And on top of that the understanding that if they break anything that shouldn't break that they pay for the part. That's still a good deal for them and over time will help pay back your investment. The only issue being that you're still out of pocket in the short term.
Time is also a part in all this. If you're loading handgun or less critical rifle ammo in bulk a progressive can compress a lot of loading into a shorter time. If you're tight for spare time because of other commitments from family, work or whatever it may be the only viable option. But if you have time to watch a few hours worth of TV per month then you can buy a better quality single stage and set it up to load even your handgun ammo needs for cheaper than a progressive setup.
And as an aside bonus your IQ will likely rise by avoiding the drivel that is so common on regular TV these days.
The money spent on the single stage will not be wasted either. I far and away prefer a single stage for my rifle loading for the powder handling reason I mentioned above. And a single stage is really handy for any side jobs or lower volume cartridge loading duties. For example I don't shoot enough .44Mag to justify buying the conversion kit for my Dillon. I just load that ammo on my single stage. So having both really compliments each other. And going with the single stage first keeps the cost down until later on. Or you may find that you simply don't need to move up to a progressive.