No flame taken. The M94 Swedish Carbine, being a bit lighter, and with a barrel length of slightly under 18 inches does leave an impression on those who have fired a box or so of service or factory cartridges from one. I love the Swedes, but would much rather fire a M96 or M38 than the M94, unless I have downloaded some ammunition to make it more comfortable to shoot. A short barreled 30-06, .270, 8x57 or similar calibre rifle loaded with slower burning powder would probably have the same effect.
Another factor is that a M94 Swedish Mauser Carbine is probably a lot more expensive than the other rifles mentioned. Last time I looked, the M94 was running into four figures for a half decent one. Trade-Ex has sporter rifles available for $300-$400 that would be more suitable for the OP's requirements, and with a bit of judicious looking he could find one that has a side safety, sporter stock and drilled and tapped for scope mounts, which would save a lot in Gunsmithing costs. Shortening a barrel and installing a front sight would be reasonable. (In my opinion, in a hunting rifle, the side or low aftermarket safety is important as the original Mauser safety does not allow quick access and scope mounting.)
I still have my .308 Ruger, and for old times sake I sometimes take it to the range and fire a few shots with it. At 77 years old, I will probably not use it again for game animals, but it does bring back a lot of memories of great hunts.
Last edited:
