Short-Barreled Tactical Rifles: Remington Noses Out Savage

pontcanna

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
32   0   0
Location
Victoria, BC
Short-Barreled Tactical Rifles: Remington Noses Out Savage

The LTR’s accuracy, reliability, smooth action, and quality stock were just the right elements to beat out the Savage 10FP .308 bolt gun. But all in, we’d be happy to own either one.

The 1960s were a trying time for law enforcement in America. Radical anti-government groups were popping up, and drug use began its long-term intrusion into everyday life. Shoot-outs with police were becoming more common. Criminals were starting to take more hostages during the commission of crimes. It became clear to law-enforcement leaders that they needed officers with specialized training for these situations. The days of using military surplus weapons, .38 revolvers and shotguns had changed.

Chief Daryl F. Gates of the Los Angeles Police department has been credited with starting the first SWAT (Special Weapons and Tactics) team in 1967. It was composed of sixty of the department’s best marksmen. Now most large departments have a well-trained SWAT Unit that is capable on being called into action 24 hours a day. To supplement SWAT and to secure crime scenes until SWAT can arrive, ERTs (Early Response Teams) have been developed in the ranks of the regular patrol officers. This is where there is a great need for less expensive and easily transported tactical rifles, such as those with 20-inch barrels.

Why a short-barreled rifle, you ask? In urban situations a short-barreled rifle is easier to handle in close quarters. Since the size of today’s police cars are shrinking, a short-barrel rifle is much easier to carry in the trunk or even in the front seat. Departments need trained officers with rifles capable of sub-MOA accuracy. For the civilian, these rifles are handy, easy to carry, fun to shoot, and make great hunting rifles.

We recently tested two guns that fit in this class: Remington’s Model 700 LTR (Light Tactical Rifle) .308 No. 5739, which usually sells for about $850, and the Savage 10FP .308, $621.

How We Tested
We knew one of the first things our readers would want to know is how the 20-inch barrel affects the rifles’ accuracy and the velocity of the ammunition. So to answer this question we tested a Remington 700 VS in .308 with a 26-inch barrel. The statistics have been included in our accuracy and chronograph table nearby, but briefly answer your question about loss of velocity compared to a 26-inch barrel: We saw a loss of as much as 276 fps to a velocity loss as low as 11 fps. As far as accuracy goes, our two test rifles had slightly better groups than the 26-inch barreled rifle.

To test these two rifles we decided to shoot five different brands of ammunition with both 150- and 168-grain bullets. We wanted to try regular hunting ammo, such as that you can find in any discount store, and we wanted to try the match ammunition most departments use. All accuracy testing was done off a bench at a private range in Lampasas County, Texas. To test the tactical capabilities we also shot the rifles using a Harris bipod. We shot five-shot strings with a good cleaning in between each string.

Our test ammos included Winchester Power Point 150-grain bullets, a widely available, affordable hunting round; Hornady Custom 150-grain BTSP rounds, that company’s every day .308 hunting ammunition; Federal Gold Medal Match .308 168-grain Sierra Matchking BTHPs (boattail hollowpoints), the king of the hill for .308 target shooters for years; and Winchester’s Supreme Match 168-grain BTHPs. To round off our test we chose the .308 TAP, manufactured by Hornady. The TAP ammunition is expressly designed for personal defense, and this .308 had a 168-grain A-max bullet.

To make things even we used the same scope on each rifle. It was the new model Bushnell 3200 7-21x40. This scope did an excellent job of helping the shooter get the best accuracy out of the rifles, as can be seen in the groups shot. It held up well to being moved and sighted in on three rifles. (Normally, tactical rifles are equipped with smaller scopes with less power, usually in the 4-14X range.)

Here’s what we thought of each rifle in more detail:

Remington 700 LTR .308 No. 5739, $850

http://www.gun-tests.com/newspics/18-8-Rem.pdf

Remington does not have a suggested retail for this rifle. They let the dealers set the price, with $850 being an average selling price. Even though the rifles are produced in small volumes for the police and military, they are occasionally available to the public. This 20-inch model is available in .308, .223 and .300 SAUM. Remington also sells a .308 LTR TWS (Total Weapons System) that is scoped, cased, and comes with bipod and sling. In other words, it is ready to go.

The 700-series action’s bolt face, barrel, and receiver surround and support the cartridge head. The Model 700 receiver is machined from ordnance-grade steel, and the muzzle crown is recessed to protect the rifling. This is the same action used for the M-24 Sniper Weapon System built for the U.S. Army.

The Model 700 LTR’s 20-inch barrel is 1.5 pounds lighter than the standard 26-inch version, and the 20-inch gun weighs in at 9.0 pounds. Model 700’s chambered for .223 Remington and .308 have five-shot (4+1) capacities.

This rifle has a floorplate for easy unloading. This is a safe and quick way to unload the rifle in the field. With the push of a button, located in the trigger area, the floorplate pops open, dropping the rounds in the magazine in your hand.

When you pick this rifle up, one of the things you first notice is the fluted barrel. The 20-inch barrel has three 3/8-inch-wide flutes. All the metal parts are matte finished, which is appropriate for a tactical rifle. The rifle comes drilled and tapped for standard 700 scope bases. We used Weaver two-piece bases on both rifles. The stock on the LTR is made for Remington by HS Precision. It has aircraft quality aluminum bedding blocks, which stiffen and stabilize the stocks, and allow for accurate and consistent torquing of the action screws against metal sleeves in the blocks. Remington advised that the action screws have 43 in.-lbs. of torque from the factory, but the screws can be tightened down to 65 in.-lbs., and this may improve accuracy slightly.

Our rifle had a 3.25-pound trigger, but we were lucky because most rifles leaving the factory are set at 4.5 pounds. Unlike the Savage, this trigger is not readily adjustable by the shooter. Our trigger was smooth and crisp, nonetheless.

Savage 10FP 20-inch .308, $621

http://www.gun-tests.com/newspics/18-8-Sav.pdf

Savage rifles are known for being accurate at a fair price. The 10FP was no exception. The stiff action of the Savage, combined with the barrel-nut attachment system and an adjustable Accu-trigger, provide for very accurate rifle right out of the box.

When you first pick this rifle up, you notice the weight and the balance. A scoped 10FP will weigh in at more than 10 pounds, but this rifle is not designed to be carried in the field. The button-rifled barrel is attached to the action by the use of a barrel nut; this and the strength of a top-loading action makes for a very stiff, accurate rifle. Metal parts are matte finished and non-reflective. The synthetic stock has dual pillar bedding sleeves. It has a smooth finish with checkering molded into it on the wrist and forearm. The mold marks are evident on the bottom and the right side of the stock.

Savage has a winner with the Accu-trigger. Ours came out of the box set at 1.75 pounds, but it is fully adjustable by the owner.

The bolt is oversized with a round knob on the end. This may look a little strange, but it came in handy when we tried some speed shooting. The big bolt handle is easy to find and operate quickly, we thought.

The rifles come from Savage drilled and tapped for scope mounts. Also, Savage includes a group the rifle shot during test firing. At the factory, this particular rifle shot a 0.44-inch group. The 20-inch barreled 10FP is available in .308 and .223. You can get an optional stock made by HS Precision, Choate or McMillan. These rifles are readily available to the public.

Shooting these rifles was a lot of fun, but you should know that when you shorten the barrel of a rifle, it tends to increase recoil and muzzle blast. Off the bench the accuracy of these rifles was almost identical. The LTR shot a best group of 0.34 inch, while the 10FP was very close with a 0.38-inch group. These were not flukes because the two rifles consistently shot less than 0.50-inch groups. Even though they both preferred 168-grain bullets, they liked different brands at that weight. Strangely, the LTR had consistently lower velocities with the same ammunition.

Since these rifles were designed for law enforcement and military use, we decided to shoot them off a Harris bipod, as quickly as we could shoot three shots. This test proved interesting. The LTR action was definitely smoother, while the 10FP’s oversized bolt handle made it easier to work. Using the TAP ammo our groups averaged 1.50 inches, and our time for three shots was around six seconds. With a little practice the groups and speed should get better.

Gun Tests Recommends

Savage 10FP .308, $621. Buy It. Savage makes an accurate, dependable rifle for a great price. The Accu-trigger makes it a pleasure to shoot and helps keep the groups small. It is a well-thought-out rifle for its intended use. The dual-pillar stock bedding helps it maintain the overall stiffness of the rifle and action. So if you are on budget, you could not go wrong with this rifle.

Remington 700 LTR .308, $850. Our Pick. Even though the LTR is a little more expensive, we felt it was a better rifle for tactical use. The stock is well worth the extra money since it is reinforced, textured, and finished better. The action was very smooth and functioned flawlessly. It was more accurate than the Savage, but the difference was so slight it was not a consideration. The bottom drop of loaded ammunition is a major safety feature.
 
These goofs again.

Buy the Savage LE2B, or whatever they're calling it these days, and you'll be glad you shied away from the Remington. Hinged floorplates do nothing for me and with the Savage clad inthe McMillan (my choice) or the HS stock, you're way ahead of the Remington, and right out ofthe box.
 
BigUglyMan said:
These goofs again.

Buy the Savage LE2B, or whatever they're calling it these days, and you'll be glad you shied away from the Remington. Hinged floorplates do nothing for me and with the Savage clad inthe McMillan (my choice) or the HS stock, you're way ahead of the Remington, and right out ofthe box.

BigUglyMan,
That is your opinion and rightfully so entitled. I have tried both and prefer the Remington, my opinion. I think both are good rifles so I think whatever appeals to the individual shooter would be more appropriate than saying one is better than the other.
 
Buy the Savage LE2B, or whatever they're calling it these days, and you'll be glad you shied away from the Remington.

That may be your opinion but two friends of mine that recently bought Savage bolt action rifles had feeding or extracting problems right out of the box. One had to mail his away for warranty work as soon as he got it and the other guy fixed the feeding problem himself after a bit of research on the internet. Savage may be having a bit of problems with quality control right now.
 
Silverback said:
That may be your opinion but two friends of mine that recently bought Savage bolt action rifles had feeding or extracting problems right out of the box. One had to mail his away for warranty work as soon as he got it and the other guy fixed the feeding problem himself after a bit of research on the internet. Savage may be having a bit of problems with quality control right now.


It is starting to seem that way....I've spoken to a couple of guys with extraction/ejection problems as well...
 
This is such a one sided test, cosidering the 700 shot 0.34" with a top of the line stock and the Savage 0.38" with the factory stock as it only comes with it and the Choate. Put the Savage into an HS, McMillan or a few other good ones and I am sure it will more then make up that 0.04" the 700 has on it. The trigger is better, the barrel is heavier and mounting of the barrel is far superior with the lock nut.
 
Comparing apples to apples is easy to say but tuff to do when doing a factory comparison in my opinion. If they were all apples there would be no need of different brands, and no need of this chat. I think there is truth in all that is said, Like B.U.M. my savages have been flawless and have served me and my wife better than I could have ever hoped for, they were bought when the Accutrigger first came out and the quality was outstanding and I couldnt recomend them enough. I have a few friends that have bought the newer savages and one had an extractor problem that was a quick fix. The rifle is still an increadable shooter and bang for the buck even with the needed repair I feel comes out ontop...Personal preference...Remingtons have had thier factory hickups also quality control sometimes takes a temporary dive when demand outway's production and lets be honest I dont think savage has ever been as popular as it has in the last 5 years!! Now Im not knocking the remington either it is a great rifle, the base for many custom built rifles on this board and a proven performer with years of history. Each rifle has unique characteristics in options that are going to apeal to different people's preference and shooting styles along with what the individual expects to do with the rifle. Speak on what it is you like about the rifle of your choice that the other one doesnt have or doesnt perform as well.

I love my savages because they are extreamly accurate out of the box. The factory Accu-trigger was revolutionary in having a factory rifle with a trigger pull down to 1.5#'s. They ballance great, have a smooth cycleing bolt with a solid lockup. Was not happy with the factory stock on mine so I switched it to a choate ultimate sniper stock. The blade on the front of the accu-trigger is one of those love hate things....nice thing is if you hate it it's easy to remove. Mine is a model 12BVSS wife has a Model 10FPLE..1A I think....
 
Steve David said:
This is such a one sided test, cosidering the 700 shot 0.34" with a top of the line stock and the Savage 0.38" with the factory stock as it only comes with it and the Choate. Put the Savage into an HS, McMillan or a few other good ones and I am sure it will more then make up that 0.04" the 700 has on it. The trigger is better, the barrel is heavier and mounting of the barrel is far superior with the lock nut.

Steve,
If the Savages are so good, why aren't the US Army and numerous Law Enforcement Agencies using the HS Precision, McMillan stocked models. This is not knock against Savages, I am just wondering why you never see a Savage in the hands of a sniper in Iraq/Afghan or a police sniper etc.
 
Both are good rifles and it comes to a matter of personal preference. Out of the box the accu-trigger is better than the 700 trigger. The 700 is a better looking rifle, never found the savage to be a sharp looking rifle. You are paying the money for it, buy which one you prefer. Neither one would be a bad choice. Its Chevys and Fords.
 
EC said:
Steve,
If the Savages are so good, why aren't the US Army and numerous Law Enforcement Agencies using the HS Precision, McMillan stocked models. This is not knock against Savages, I am just wondering why you never see a Savage in the hands of a sniper in Iraq/Afghan or a police sniper etc.
This is a neverending debate, but you also extremely rarely find Savage actions available in custom rifles.

-Rohann
 
EC,

Show me one LTR in service in Iraq with US forces, for that matter, show me a factory out of the box rifle in service in Iraq with US forces, and do not say the M24 as it is not built in the factory. It is a custom shop model not even built on a 700 action it is built on a 40X action and the M40A3 as we all know is a completely custom built rifle in the USMC armory.

When it comes to LE and the McMillam or HS stocked models, well even though this thread was not about either of those models, all three models only being available with 26" barrles as oppsed to a 20", the McMIllan is infact in use with several smaller LE agencies in the US who do not have the big budgets to buy custom rifles, I have seen them myself and I am certain that the "new" HS models are in service with US LE agencies aswell especially now that Savage has greatly imporved the package model.

Either of these models could also be employed here in TO with the ETF, they use out of the box 700P rifles, so these Savage models could infact do the trick aswell, only they are newer and the ETF has had the 700P's since before the McMillan or HS model were introduced.

This thread was about the 20" barrel model 10FP and the 700LTR, both very good rifles, I know this first hand, I have had both, but there is no question that the Savage has a better trigger, a heavier and superior barrel being button rifled and the lock nut for the barrel is a much better way to attach the barrel.

My dad has an LTR with a super trigger job, beded and a Badger Bolt handle, that rifle cost $1300.00 when all was said and done, a great deal as far as I am concerned, (thank you now banned awsome rifle builder in Alberta), and I supplied the bolt handle, so add another $80.00. Given the opportunity, he would have instead bought he Savage 20" for the mentioned reasons.

The Savage is $659.00 and already has a nice big bolt handle, it has a better trigger and can be beded for minimal $$$ if require, or for the extra $700.00, a nice stock can be had, plus a good base and set of rings, like TPS and a decent scope liek a Bushnell 3200 10X and I am sure one would still not reach the price of just the LTR itself and for this amount of money, the Savage would now make up and even exceed that 0.04" differance, which in reality is not that much at all.

Don't get me wrong here, I am not saying that the Savage is the only rifle in the world, hell my dream rifle is a real M40A1 and I would take it over any Savage anyday, I would take it over any rifle anyday for that matter, but for an out of the box rifle with a 20" barrel, which is what this thread is about, the Savage, with possibly the exception of the stock, is a far better deal then the LTR overall, and again, that 0.04" short fall in accurcy can well be surpassed with the extra $700.00 saved by buying the 10FP.

Now Rohann,

You, my young misguided only M24 on the brain dreamer, hit some of the bigger target or bench shooting sites in the US, or the Savage Shooters site, there are plenty of "custom" rifles built with Savage actions, even better, why not start a thread about this very topic here, I bet you would get a big surprise.
 
Last edited:
Rohann said:
This is a neverending debate, but you also extremely rarely find Savage actions available in custom rifles.

-Rohann


Rohann, this isn't the first time you've made this ridiculous comment and this isn't the first time I've called you on it.

Once again, Savage sold actions and barreled actions for many years prior to the current management team. Just ask any gunsmith worth their salt. Plenty of custom rifles were and still are, being made on Savage actions.

Old news, bra.
 
Last edited:
I believe Mystic Player uses the stevens 200 actions for the majority of his rifle builds. Chime in if I'm misinformed. I'd almost put up my 10FPLE 1A against any Rem 700 stock gun of the same caliber and barrel length, (I just need more practice behind the trigger). I've shot both, and out of the box, even with the extraction problems, the Savage is definitely a more accurate gun. Just my $0.02.

-Jason
 
6mmBR.com. You will find a few that have done very well. In fact, there are a few US 'world' records held by Savage based rifles. A few Can F class national/international level comps have seen Savage (actually CIL's) compete and do very well. One was featured in a Precision Shooting article years back.

I have put together several custom LR hunting/target rifles on Savage/Stevens actions. For a factory based action, none better. Yes, that includes SAKO, REM, Win, Wby, Mauser, etc.

You can read more about my newest creation, the 6.5 Mystic 1000m BR/F class rifle elsewhere. It shoots extremely well at the 200yd range (as far as tested to date). It will put them all in one very small hole at 200yds.

The US equipment thing is all about marketing and who took part. How come Luppy is so well represented yet there are so many other brands? How come Unertl or Redfield are not better represented given their orig status? What about US Optics for the high budget departments?

The 'forces' have had a history of following what was before. Rem made a huge push during the Vietnam era and became the rifle of choice (despite awesome performance from Win). Luppy has done the same over the last few decades. Money and marketing has had its rewards.

Jerry
 
This "semi custom" C.I.L. 950T (Savage J action)will shoot the lights ut at 1K +
and it has a stock (but tuned) trigger.
It also has a wood stock and a scope that is so old as to be called "obsolete".

it shoots the lights out , regardless of how it "looks"!:D
Cat
300WSM950tl.jpg

950tBUTT.jpg
 
I was mainly referring to big custom rifle manufacturers like IBA. Yes, I do love the M24/M40, but I'll shut up now.

-Rohann
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom