short Outlaw

Count me in

  • I'm in I would order

    Votes: 18 60.0%
  • I'd consider it

    Votes: 12 40.0%

  • Total voters
    30
  • Poll closed .
Make it a 15" barrel and i might consider it, Definatly say NO though because it would be restricted. I Swear the government only came up with " Restriced " as their way of weening out the firearms THEY dont like.
 
LOL. That's the funniest poll I've ever seen.
You forgot the "No, I'm not in" and "Probably not" :D
 
LOL. That's the funniest poll I've ever seen.
You forgot the "No, I'm not in" and "Probably not" :D
In fairness it's not a poll on the gun itself but one measuring people's interest and their intensity of interest.

It is also a good indication of the number of people on this site who are so intellectually limited that they would think think a restricted, POS Norinco hammer gun might be a good idea. Maybe someone will suggest one in 8 gauge. :rolleyes:
 
Your new so I guess you missed it. The Outlaw arrived with a stock for a reason. It's short-ranged enough as it is. The thread that lead to the creation of the Outlaw was based on someone wanting pretty much what you have posted. I didn't buy an Outlaw (no ejectors) and I certainly wouldn't buy one with no stock. Good for you if you get CanAm to make a run though. Canada needs more guns.
 
In fairness it's not a poll on the gun itself but one measuring people's interest and their intensity of interest.

It is also a good indication of the number of people on this site who are so intellectually limited that they would think think a restricted, POS Norinco hammer gun might be a good idea. Maybe someone will suggest one in 8 gauge. :rolleyes:

it just goes to show the intollerance of alot of people on this site. I roll my eyes at people who buy .50 bmg but theres people on here who own them. Even a AR there is really no need for one of those other than the fun factor.
 
Last edited:
If you remember the original Outlaw posts, this is quite civil. If the intention is to make a full out, shotgun-handgun, you'll get the people who just like big loud wrist breakers. If you just want a shortened stock outlaw, which in itself is too heavy a gun to be fired one handed, then I don't see there being much interest beyond a couple dozen or so. If you could do away with the exposed hammers, I'd be more willing to go along. It's annoying, those things. Considering it could only be fired at the range anyway, it's not like you'd carry it all day loaded with the hammers uncocked, as some do with the full sized outlaw, if they are taking it hunting. Make it a break action, #### on closing, pistol shotgun, with a 5 inch barrel. No, I'm never going to hit probably more than 3 of 25 on the trap range, with it (if they would even allow it, which they wouldn't). It'd be merely a 2l bottle at 10 y destroyer. Therapeutic recoil therapy :rockOn:

Shortening the stock, is only going half way, shorten the barrel as well, go all the way.
 
It is also a good indication of the number of people on this site who are so intellectually limited that they would think think a restricted, POS Norinco hammer gun might be a good idea. Maybe someone will suggest one in 8 gauge. :rolleyes:

it just goes to show the intollerance of alot of people on this site. I roll my eyes at people who buy .50 bmg but theres people on here who own them.

With mindsets like that, you guys would have probably fitted in well with the believers that the earth was flat. With fellow gunnutz like you guys, who needs enemies! :rolleyes:

ManInBlack, why would you speak of Claybusters intollerance when you say yourself you have an intolerance? You make a valid point with your first line, then take all credibility away from it in your second.
 
With mindsets like that, you guys would have probably fitted in well with the believers that the earth was flat. With fellow gunnutz like you guys, who needs enemies! :rolleyes:

ManInBlack, why would you speak of Claybusters intollerance when you say yourself you have an intolerance? You make a valid point with your first line, then take all credibility away from it in your second.

I dont lose any credibility at all. You dont see me going in thread telling people they are unintelligent for buying rifles that have no real use other than fun. I can roll me eyes all day at people but it doesnt mean that I think they are stupid for buying it or wanting it for that matter. How many times in a thread do I have to say "THIS IS FOR PEOPLE WHO WANT ONE OR WOULD CONSIDER IT" not for people who dont want one. BUT some people think their opinions are more important and have the need to share their opinion
 
Search out the original Outlaw posts, you'll see how well asking people uninterested in buying, not to post, went. Also, the poll that doesn't have an option for "not interested" means anyone who isn't interested, will feel the need to post that they are not interested, when they could have been satisfied just clicking a poll. My earlier posts are just me trying to get across what I would prefer in a restricted shotgun. But if at your request, this thread is for head nodding only, this is my last post in it.
 
Make it a 15" barrel and i might consider it, Definatly say NO though because it would be restricted. I Swear the government only came up with " Restriced " as their way of weening out the firearms THEY dont like.

That would be all of them one 12.* classification at a time.

I'd buy one just "because".
 
If it was made just like that with a longer barrel to get it 26" OAL (non-restricted) then YES... otherwise no...

Restricted = Useless
 
Back
Top Bottom