I had a 22in 300 Win Mag that shot around 3100 fps. There can easily be as much variation from one barrel to the next as speed lost by shortening a barrel. The 22 in barreled gun I had was a Model 70 featherweight and was s handy little rifle.
If you like the rifle, buy it. Lopping 2" off the barrel costs the same as recrowning or 25-30 bucks.
Since its a good idea to shoot a new rifle before changing anything you could do a before and after chronographing.
Or even better... take off an inch of barrel at a time, shoot the same ammo each time and post the chrono results... this whole "you might as well be shooting a .30/06" thing is a "decades-old" pet peeve and does not at all line up with my experience.
Of course it would. But at a higher cost. More recoil and powder. You wouldnt be using the .300 WM to its potential. It would be a waste. IMHO
Just like driving a one-ton diesel crew cab around town to get groceries. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me, but you're welcome to do it.
To compensate for loss in velocity and muzzle blast on a shorter barrelled rifle you could try using a faster burning powder,all though most magnums prefer slow burning powder! (Reason fo longer barrels)
they are not made for that?
If peak pressure is not reached before end of barrel maximum velocity will not be reached! Result will be unburnt powder after bullet leaves the barrel = reason for longer barrel to have complete burn, only way to ensure complete burn in short barrel magnum is faster burning powder!Apparently powder choice has to do with case capacity, not barrel length. The highest velocities will come from the same powder, regardless of barrel length.
I suspect this is because peek pressure is realized well before the end of the barrel, so changes in barrel length do not impact where the peak pressure is, they only change how long the expanding gasses can accelerate the bullet.
The reason for longer barrels is the fact that the magnums gain more velocity per inch of barrel, so they have more to gain from longer barrels and they don't meet everyone's expectation of a "magnum" without that extra length/velocity.
Just like driving a one-ton diesel crew cab around town to get groceries. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me, but you're welcome to do it.
If peak pressure is not reached before end of barrel maximum velocity will not be reached! Result will be unburnt powder after bullet leaves the barrel = reason for longer barrel to have complete burn, only way to ensure complete burn in short barrel magnum is faster burning powder!
Its cheaper than taking the Kenworth, but I guess it depends on how how much grub a guy needs.
It's been debated many times, but extensive tests prove that the same powder that gives maximum velocity in a long barrel,
will give the highest velocity in the shorter tube as well. So, powder "juggling" is simply wasted time, IMHO. Eagleye.
If peak pressure is not reached before end of barrel maximum velocity will not be reached! Result will be unburnt powder after bullet leaves the barrel = reason for longer barrel to have complete burn, only way to ensure complete burn in short barrel magnum is faster burning powder!
If peak pressure is not reached before end of barrel maximum velocity will not be reached! Result will be unburnt powder after bullet leaves the barrel = reason for longer barrel to have complete burn, only way to ensure complete burn in short barrel magnum is faster burning powder!




























