SIG 229 40 or 9mm?

RCPerkins

Regular
Rating - 100%
36   0   0
Location
Bruce Peninsula
I am thinking of getting a 229, likely use it for IDPA or plinking, should I get the 9mm or the 40? I already have pistols in both calibers and realize the 9 would be cheaper on ammo, but would the 40 being larger have a greater effect on the longevity of the pistol? Thanks
 
I would go with the 9mm. I'm kinda paranoid so I only like to shoot the .40 and 357 Sig out of a stainless framed Sig.
 
I own a .40, the build is beefier for the .40 loads compression. To go to 9mm in a .40, all you need is a barrel & magazines. BUT, to go from 9mm to .40 you need spring, slide, barrel, and magazines.

** Note- I have read some forums from the USA that guys are using their .40/.357 magazines to load and shoot 9mm through a 229 with a 9mm barrel, but I cannot say whether or not it works. It may be Barrel dependent (I think one guy said it worked with his Barsto but not his other one)** IF YOU TRY THIS YOU ARE TAKING YOUR OWN CHANCES

Here in Calgary, the different in price right now for shooting .40 vs 9mm is minimal currently...

250 x 9mm : $65.00
250 x .40 S&W: $72.00

Thats only $28.00 over 1000 rounds (100 magazines shot - only $0.28 a mag). So to shoot .40 it isn't THAT much more expensive.

9mm is easier to sell later on, as a lot of new shooters "want 9mm", but the .40 has a heavier slide making recoil less.

My P229R is heavy, and SUPER easy to shoot + reacquire target fast due to the low recoil. I can't imagine how much easier my 229 would shoot 9mm ! haha.

2205623824_42aa8152eb.jpg
 
I would buy the 40 and you can convert down to the 9 when you feel like it. You won't be able to go the other way around. That's what I did.

You could or you could just order the caliber conversion kit from Quester / Sig. You know the one that comes with complete slide assembly, tritium night sights, barrel, and magazine?

Just saying. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom