Sightron Quality

Robmcleod82

CGN Regular
Rating - 99%
103   1   0
Location
Nanton
Could anybody give me a comparison of sightron glass to leupold vx3 glass? Mystic Player seems to speak highly of the sightron product line but ive never had one in my hands to check out. I am in need of a scope for my 223 and was planning on a vx3 6.5-20 but am also exploring other options. I am a Leupold man so this is kind of hard for me to do ;)
 
Hey talk about coincidence! I'm having the same dilemma, but for me it's to put on a Rem 700 5R 308 that'll be used 95% for target shooting from 100v to 600v.

Same as Rob, I'm thinking either this Leupold VX-3 6.5-20x40 Long Range: ht tp://www.leupold.com/hunting-and-shooting/products/scopes/vx-3-riflescopes/vx-3-6-5-20x40mm-long-range/

Or the Sightron SIII 6-24x50 LR MD :
ht tp://www.sightron.com/index.php?action=view_document&did=1201816362&cat_id=6&id=4

Both retail for about same price

Rob, don't want to hijack your post, but I want to hear pros/cons for each brand too.
 
Last edited:
Could anybody give me a comparison of sightron glass to leupold vx3 glass? Mystic Player seems to speak highly of the sightron product line but ive never had one in my hands to check out. I am in need of a scope for my 223 and was planning on a vx3 6.5-20 but am also exploring other options. I am a Leupold man so this is kind of hard for me to do ;)

Come by the shop in a few weeks and we should have 1 to check out.
I am looking at bringing in some cheaper than NF alternatives, so ordered 1 top end Sightron, a upper end Vortex and the new Weaver Tactical , all to do some unbiased comparative testing.

I believe in testing products before taking on a line and then flogging it indiscriminately. The big box stores tend to do this and I think it leaves the consumer like a test monkey.
To have some real world experiences with the lot and have direct comparisons to NF, MK4s USO, S&B and the PRH scopes I think would be of value.
 
If I had the cash, and the knowledge of what I was looking at I would love to buy a scope from each of the most popular companies do a comparison, take them apart and compare the internals.
 
I think I can shed a little light on the subject. I talked to Jerry quite a bit before I took the leap and ordered an SIII 6.5 X 24 MD. I haven't got it mounted yet but my preliminary opinion is pretty good. Fit and finish is great. The tactile feel of the turrets is good. Once I get it mounted it will be easier to compare the optics against the Nightforce NXS. ( I've got 2 NXS's, both 5.5x22x56, one with zero stop and one without ) I've also got a few Leupolds VX III's mounted but nothing over 14 power. I can say right now that I like the clarity of the Sightron better than any of my Leupolds but I'll do an honest test when I get everything mounted. I know both my NXS's will easily see the daylight through a bullet hole at 300yds. My biggest question is how the Sightron will stand up under heavy recoil.

The SIII is for a Sendero chambered in 300 RUM. I've put a Jewel HVR trigger in and will be skim bedding it before I put it all together. I'm STILL waiting on some release agent for Devcon 10110 which is why I haven't got it mounted yet. I'll be mounting it on a Badger Ordnance +25 MOA rail with Nightforce light weight Ti Alloy rings which should hold everything in the right place. I went for the SIII as it half the price of a NXS, which is more inline for a relatively stock rifle. I can justify the extra cash to put an NXS on my custom rigs but it seemed a little much for a relatively stock rifle that will be used mainly for hunting. I'll know more next week when I get it all together and I'll post a more informed opinion then. You can PM me with any questions if you like.
 
Can you compare the SIII Sightrons to the Monarch Golds from Nikon? I'm thinking of a Nikon Gold because the eye relief is greater. The use would be varmint hunting / plinking. Distance - not sure yet, I've never had an excellent plus scope yet.
 
I think I can shed a little light on the subject. I talked to Jerry quite a bit before I took the leap and ordered an SIII 6.5 X 24 MD. I haven't got it mounted yet but my preliminary opinion is pretty good. Fit and finish is great. The tactile feel of the turrets is good. Once I get it mounted it will be easier to compare the optics against the Nightforce NXS. ( I've got 2 NXS's, both 5.5x22x56, one with zero stop and one without ) I've also got a few Leupolds VX III's mounted but nothing over 14 power. I can say right now that I like the clarity of the Sightron better than any of my Leupolds but I'll do an honest test when I get everything mounted. I know both my NXS's will easily see the daylight through a bullet hole at 300yds. My biggest question is how the Sightron will stand up under heavy recoil.

The SIII is for a Sendero chambered in 300 RUM. I've put a Jewel HVR trigger in and will be skim bedding it before I put it all together. I'm STILL waiting on some release agent for Devcon 10110 which is why I haven't got it mounted yet. I'll be mounting it on a Badger Ordnance +25 MOA rail with Nightforce light weight Ti Alloy rings which should hold everything in the right place. I went for the SIII as it half the price of a NXS, which is more inline for a relatively stock rifle. I can justify the extra cash to put an NXS on my custom rigs but it seemed a little much for a relatively stock rifle that will be used mainly for hunting. I'll know more next week when I get it all together and I'll post a more informed opinion then. You can PM me with any questions if you like.

Go to Canadian Tire and buy some paste wax, or use Pam, the cooking spray. They all work. - dan
 
Shot a Sako TRG 22 tonight with the SIII Sightron 6-24 x 50 and I was very impressed with the clarity of the optics, the side focus knob and overall performance. I like it better than my Leupold VXL to be honest.
Can't lose with this scope from what I can tell. Eye relief wasn't as much as the Leupold VXIII/L models, but I don't think it hinders the scope much.
 
Come by the shop in a few weeks and we should have 1 to check out.
I am looking at bringing in some cheaper than NF alternatives, so ordered 1 top end Sightron, a upper end Vortex and the new Weaver Tactical , all to do some unbiased comparative testing.

I believe in testing products before taking on a line and then flogging it indiscriminately. The big box stores tend to do this and I think it leaves the consumer like a test monkey.
To have some real world experiences with the lot and have direct comparisons to NF, MK4s USO, S&B and the PRH scopes I think would be of value.

Which Vortex Rick? PST? Or is it the Razor?
I am in the same boat as everyone lol
Looking for a nice Variable power MD scope to throw on my Tacy 308
 
Ohh, please do let us know when you get some, and $$ of course. :D

What I have ordered in are 6x24x50s in both moa and mil reticle both in FFP and 2nd focal.
The 2nd focla plane scopes will be under $1000.00 and the FFP scope just over.
Exact pricing won't be established until I actually have them in stock.

Vortex is telling me mid to late April delivery on these.

I also ordered some of the new Weaver Tactical 6x20 power scopes to see what they are about.

Stay tuned.:D
 
Hi guys, just wanted to drop a quick note. I bought a fixed power Sightron SII Big Sky(36x42) from Jerry a couple weeks ago. I haven't had the chance to take it out and shoot with it yet but I thought I'de share some of my thoughts if anyone is interested.

The scope is a nice weight, feels good and solid. The turrets are a nice size, nice feel and are clearly labeled with hash marks so you know how many turns up and down you are. Mine has the fine cross hair reticle, and while it is very fine, it's still very easy to see, which makes it great for target shooting. Another thing I liked about this particular scope is that fact that is has 1/8" clicks, which I wanted for target shooting. Eye relief is very good as well. That's all I can think of for now. I will share more when I get out and shoot a few targets.
 
Does someone have a SIII 6-24x50 LRMD and have a picture of the reticle?
The Mildot is a 24x I think, that would make big dots in the reticle.
I just want to know if the center crosshair is fine enough for precise target shooting.
Thanks!
 
Likely had the first SIII LR 6x24 w/mildots in Canada. I bought this just to see what the fuss was from all the US posts. WOW, I was very impressed. I have compared it side by side with some pretty pricey product and the optics on the Sightron was markedly better.

Sightron has had a long history of solid tracking scopes and this was no different. In fact, I am quite surprised at how well the scopes I have used do track. We are not dealing with multi thousand dollar scopes.

I have since tried various items from the SII Big Sky and SIII LR line up, all with very positive results. So I started selling them. Don't like selling stuff I haven't tried or have faith in.

I have as much, if not more experience with these scopes then anyone at this time. I continue to be impressed with the quality, clarity, resolution, brightness and colour of these scopes. And these qualities are throughout their product line (big sky SII and SIII LR).

There are some compromises in the less expensive SII Big Sky lineup but most will find these compromises acceptable given the price point and the strengths in other areas.

I will soon get a few more of the new SIII product line. I can't wait to test the new 10X50 target scope and the fixed power tactical version with 150mins of UP. Initial reports on the 10X50 from the US continue to be very positive.

I have had the opportunity to use and view a very wide range of scopes from the inexpensive to the Exotic. It has made me quite picky about what I consider good glass and mechanicals. For those interested in how I test scopes, you can visit my website and look in the rifle tech section.

There have been some pretty pricey products that didn't succeed in my tests. Price does not always mean good mechanicals. Nor good glass.

Given the requirements of LR shooting at varied distances, a scope that tracks reliably and clear optics are requirements to hit small targets. Alot of glass look great until you try and pick out a pop can sized object at distances beyond 1000yds. Separates the good from the great in a big hurry.

So far the Sightrons have really impressed and really offer performance well beyond their price point. This is truly the first time I can say that you will get more then what you pay for a scope.

I fully expect the 10X50 scope to make some serious waves in the F class and competition world this season. If this product is going to fail in reliability, this is the place that is going to find out in a big hurry.

With these scopes being so new, long term durability is still an unknown but there are a bunch in circulation with no posted complaints that I have seen. And way more heading out to the fields and ranges in the coming months so we will get a lot of feedback over a large number of scopes.

I am sure that if shooters have issues, there will be many blogs and posts to complain. So far so good.

Also, as a too good to be true scope, there will be those that will get them to try and trash them. I am sure we will see their posts soon enough.

As for the 6x24 SIII w/mildots, the reticle is a standard mildot with circle dots (pic on Sightrons website). It is indexed at 24X and the center covers 1" at 300m. I shoot alot at 300m and my target used is 1" and that is what the reticle covers.

For some, this all sounds like a big sales pitch but I wouldn't bother selling them if they were trash. I can use and sell a wide range of scopes but my rifles will all wear Sightron SII Big Sky and SIII LR scopes for now.

For those that have read my many posts and reviews, I am sure you will know that I am not afraid to dish on a product that fails to do what it is supposed to or is over valued.

Even when the item is part of a product line that I have endorsed in the past.

Stuff has got to work
Jerry
 
So I keep going back and forth between one of these and another Nightforce. I will mean shooting soon vs. not as soon. In one place I read the 6x24 had 50 mins. elevation and on another I read 100. So which is it? If it only has 50 the the scope is useless to me. The place I read 50 was from a review done in 2007 so maybe the new ones have more?
 
Back
Top Bottom