You're talking out of your hole.
The x39 has plenty of power to properly anchor deer or moose at reasonable distances. A good friend of mine has a titanic set of moose antlers from the bull that he shot with his Ruger M77 in 7.62x39. Does the platform somehow determine the propriety of a round for hunting? Is the x39 in the Ruger bolt action somehow superior to the x39 in the SKS? Or is it the semi auto platform that offends your sense of decency? Would a Ruger Mini 30 be less offensive? Every platform has it's limitations, but to pillory someone for using a round or platform that you feel is improper is the height of conceit and self importance. Are there better choices than the SKS for deer hunting? I would say yes, but the SKS is far from the worst choice and as it is perfectly adequate given a set of parameters, why should we discourage it's ethical and legally permissible use?
Well spoken.
From my locale I'd rather see a guy with an SKS than a 300 Win Mag or 7mm Rem Mag. Lots of 'S' curves in the creek with relatively thick bush around it means shorter shots and way more knowledge / disipline about field of fire. Just too many houses that are on 'the other side' of the thick willows; big rifles carry so much further, more energy.
I've several 'Bigger' calibers that have to go for outings elsewhere.


















































