How is the quality of the crown on your SKS? I wish I had some pictures to share but first I need to learn how
to take worthwhile pictures and then how to get photobucket to work for me. Until then, perhaps someone can
provide some crown pictures to give us some examples to discuss.
Most of my SKS crowns are not counter bored except for my 1954 refurb Izhvesk which has a very professional
looking, squared, slight counterbore with a diameter of about 8mm and my 1954 Tula WSS supergrade has what looks like a
freshly done, beveled counterbore. Both those SKS have good accuracy. I also have a 1952 Tula refurb, which has
what looks to be chrome lining extending out onto the crown area with a little chip missing from the end of one of the lands.
This SKS has no accuracy and shoots two feet high at 20 yards so that I have been thinking that it has a bent barrel.
What do you think? Perhaps just a bad crown is the problem?
to take worthwhile pictures and then how to get photobucket to work for me. Until then, perhaps someone can
provide some crown pictures to give us some examples to discuss.
Most of my SKS crowns are not counter bored except for my 1954 refurb Izhvesk which has a very professional
looking, squared, slight counterbore with a diameter of about 8mm and my 1954 Tula WSS supergrade has what looks like a
freshly done, beveled counterbore. Both those SKS have good accuracy. I also have a 1952 Tula refurb, which has
what looks to be chrome lining extending out onto the crown area with a little chip missing from the end of one of the lands.
This SKS has no accuracy and shoots two feet high at 20 yards so that I have been thinking that it has a bent barrel.
What do you think? Perhaps just a bad crown is the problem?