And I can understand the Milsurp Collector mentality......if we were talking about something other than SKS. I mean come on. If it's a minty non refurb 1949, maybe I'd think hard about doing anything to it. But as for the rest let's go over it again
1. 50 year old simple, cheap rifle
2. Attractive because of price of a rifle and price of CORROSIVE AMMO \
3.Not exactly a collector's piece, unless it's a '49, or early Sino-Soviet effort
4. The majority in existence are Chinese manufactured, or if Russian are refurbed 95% of the time.
5 Most of the "bubba" mods done are drop in or bolt on, non permanent. Can be restored to former "glory" in very little time.
6.And this is my opinion on SKS vs. 858.My opinion has changed with time. Having fired both fairly extensively, for my money i went SKS, because, with a 5 rd. mag limit, that long ass mag is annoying (858).I can buy a CHROME BORE sks for $200, and have it "pimped out" for a total of $450, including original purchase price.muzzle brake, Williams aperture rear sight, fire front sight, recoil buffer, Tapco tupperware stock(Adjustable LOP was the big sell for me too.)
If I screw up the SKS rifle by shoddy maintenance, corrosion, whatever, I can buy yet another SKS for $200 or less, and add all my aftermarket parts to it from the first one. And I can do this (2 rifles,1 aftermarket package) for less than the price of ONE non chrome lined 858.Without any aftermarket goodies. An they don't shoot any better than an SKS. If we had no 5 rd. limit, my choice may be different because of the magazine.Maybe.
Don't get me wrong, I think the 858 is a great rifle.But the SKS is every bit as good for less.A better value.