SL8 or Swiss Arms black special

img0799zp0.jpg


img0800nd8.jpg

I just popped a gun boner.
 
Nicorette's pictures beat the crap out of mine. But oh well. Here's one of my PE-90 black special Target. Same set up right down to the rings. The only difference is the scope magnification.

DSCN0014.jpg
 
Last edited:
I'm trying to make the same decision myself.
Having shot both, how they shoot doesn't make a huge difference.

The fact that i can get a adapter to run AR mags in the SL is HUGE.
I'd like to have the 10 round option.
large_002.jpg

yet i still cant decide....
 
Wasn't overly impressed with either, I sold both.
Problem is I can't hunt up here with my AR.
The SL-8 looked cooler I think and didn't dent the paint off during ejection.

M.
 
It's like comparing a cadillac and a jetta, Swiss Arms is a superior brand.
Do you want a REAL proven rifle? Go with SA, they are worth every single penny.

Wait a minute, which of those is supposed to be the superior brand? The American car that will be in the shop for repairs half the time, or the German car that runs fine for five years until everything suddenly breaks down at the same time? :p
 
I have a SL-8 , sold my Swiss Arms to fund an AR project. If you were going to leave the SL-8 bone stock then its a last choice for me. If you were willing to dump some $$ then its a toss up. You will be into it for more than $3K witout even trying. I kept my SL-8 for over the following reasons

- takes AR mags with adapter
- WAAAAAY better trigger
- slightly better accuracy

My only dislike is front heavy ( heavy barrel ). Having said that, the only reason I have anything other than an AR is the fact that I can go shoot gophers with it

If you were only shooting tac rifle ( at PoCo for example ) then I would take a AR over both those. I was a Swiss Arms snob until I spent the same $$ on an AR . I can assure you that you don't get what you pay for....I would much rather have a $3K AR ( Noveske, LMT Piston, KAC , custom etc ) than a Swiss Arms...other than the restricted thing !

KensSL8Conversion2.jpg


If your main interest was shooting at a range ( you need to drive pretty far from Burnaby to plink ) and shoot tac rifle etc I prefer the handling of a short ( 14.5 ) AR is over the SL-8 and to some degree the Swiss Arms
 
The SA cycles flawlessly, 100% of the time and is very accurate. I don't have iron sights on the SL8, but find, even with a scope, the accuracy is inferior to the SA. The SL8 has the heavy barrel over the SA, but if you're only shooting semi-auto, what difference does it make? I used my SA Black Special (non-target version) to qualify easily on a 300yd range with iron sights and factory ammo. Didn't the SL8 have some cracking problem in the receiver? Don't get me wrong - the SL8 is a great rifle and its up there on my list of favourite rifles - BUT - if I had to get rid of one, I'd give up the SL8. Thats coming from a bench with bench rests.

If I were using the rifle in the bush or in tactical competitions I would choose the SL8. IMO, it has better balance, easier to shoulder and can support itself better in the prone position with no other support devices. From your original post, the SL8 might be a better rifle for you. Have you considered the Tavor? You would have the added benefit of using the LAR 10 rnd pistol mags. All it needs is a better scope. Shooting in the prone position is a piece of cake with this rifle - it supports itself, so easily.
 
Back
Top Bottom