So I gotta ask ... Why so many 1911s??

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey, it's not me that's telling people to #### off. In fact, I'm amused by the twist this thread has taken, just taking periodic breaks from practicing my "clip" changing in preparation for our weekly IPSC practice this evening, shooting one of my antediluvian 1911's.

Jeez....why are you so angry?
 
Hey, it's not me that's telling people to #### off. In fact, I'm amused by the twist this thread has taken, just taking periodic breaks from practicing my "clip" changing in preparation for our weekly IPSC practice this evening, shooting one of my antediluvian 1911's.

lol what the SR9 aint cutting it no more?
 
Last edited:
Brilliant! Now we're exercising our 'potty mouth' vocabulary, having flaunted our ignorance on firearms nomenclature and terminology and been called on it. It just keeps getting better ....
Obviously you've never served in the military where they have ways of instilling the use of proper terminology into the thickest of heads; even yours.

no i haven't - what about it? and my language changes according to the recipient - got a problem with it? too bad LOL
 
Brilliant! Now we're exercising our 'potty mouth' vocabulary, having flaunted our ignorance on firearms nomenclature and terminology and been called on it. It just keeps getting better ....
Obviously you've never served in the military where they have ways of instilling the use of proper terminology into the thickest of heads; even yours.

Lol, I have!

And I totally agree regarding your giant hovering douchecopter-ness!

(But I was described as a think-for-yourselfer. Free tip: being weak-minded and easily malleable is rewarded in the military, but it's generally not regarded as a positive in the real world.)
 
LOL did someone #### in your serial this morning?

Let me ask you something, if your precious Glock was made by 500 different manufacturers, would you be able to take parts from one and swap to another? (before you try, here a hint - this is rhetorical)

As per needing to be tuned out of the box, yep it does for my purposes - but for tacticool kids like you I am sure its still an exponential improvement :)

You can espouse all that 'striker guns are less forgiving and require a better shooter' BS all you want but we both know how many of these turds make it to the top 10 in USPSA or IPSC. Just out of curiosity, which design dominates here? (again this is rhetorical)

I can see you talk the talk, but can you also walk? Do you actually compete? If so how far up the list are you after how long?

And if not, lets see you get off the forum and your fat arse and see how far you get with your precious :)




umm nop i'm gonna call it clip from now on cuz i can see how it burns you so :p



2011s are doublestack, so 45 will hold 10 as well in Canada. once you cross the border as some do for USPSA matches, you get to take the pin out on 9/38 and load up 29 :)

Are you going to answer my question or avoid the obvious answer? I don't care if you take two 1911's of the same make and model, I can almost guarantee you can't swap parts without effecting reliability. As for your other question about multiple manufacturers of Glocks, well its pretty well that case right now. The M&P, XD, Steyr(whatever they call it), SR9 are all pretty well Glocks under a different name, and they're all sh*t with the M&P being the closest thing to the real deal.

As for Glocks and the IPSC/USPSA circuit, I don't care about gaming. Glocks are service guns, designed for defense of life, that is shooting other people. Accuracy needs to be effective for the intended role, and they're more than capable of the task. Running around ignoring the use of cover while wearing a flimsy holster and magazines displaced from the body is not realistic. Its gaming, its entertaining and still fun(shooting is always fun), but its not an accurate barometer for determining what is and is not a solid service pistol.

Actually, I enjoy watching dip####z make fools of themselves by using incorrect terminology in a peer group that prides itself on integrity and knowledge of firearms nomenclature. Publicly flaunting one's wilful ignorance says much about the person.

By all means, continue to exercise your right to do so. Americanize your speech to your heart's content, colo(u)ring your rhetoric with text-speak idiom, writing "checks" as opposed to cheques, etc. And remember to always put those 'bullet' thingys the right way into your 'clips', pointy end facing towards the 'bow' of the 'bang-bang'.

I couldn't agree more. Lack of subject knowledge speaks volumes about the individual.


But what happens when someone shows up at my door selling magazines, and I can't figure out what they're talking about because they don't say "monthly printed periodical"??!

Life is hard.

Your example is complete fiction. No one sells magazines of any sort door to door.

TDC
 
What army did you serve in? Sure wasn't Canadian Regular Army. "A think-for-yourselfer", huh? In military parlance, that means piss poor soldier that doesn't understand discipline and is incapable of following orders. In short, a discipline problem.
REAL soldiers are taught to "think for themselves" with regard to fulfilling the mission - it's called "adapt and overcome". Once you cross the start line, your battle plan has already shifted to plan "B".
But, having served in the military, you already knew that, right ... ;>)

Lol, I have!

(But I was described as a think-for-yourselfer. Free tip: being weak-minded and easily malleable is rewarded in the military, but it's generally not regarded as a positive in the real world.)
 
What army did you serve in? Sure wasn't Canadian Regular Army. "A think-for-yourselfer", huh? In military parlance, that means piss poor soldier that doesn't understand discipline and is incapable of following orders. In short, a discipline problem.
REAL soldiers are taught to "think for themselves" with regard to fulfilling the mission - it's called "adapt and overcome". Once you cross the start line, your battle plan has already shifted to plan "B".
But, having served in the military, you already knew that, right ... ;>)

Sure was! You write like someone who just joined the reserves after watching a few episodes of "Truth, Duty, Propaganda". When you get to see it a bit better, you'll realize what a joke the "adapt and overcome" thing is!

REAL soldier, eh? Don't make me laugh.
 
Last edited:
(1)Are you going to answer my question or avoid the obvious answer?

(2) I don't care if you take two 1911's of the same make and model, I can almost guarantee you can't swap parts without effecting reliability. As for your other question about multiple manufacturers of Glocks, well its pretty well that case right now. The M&P, XD, Steyr(whatever they call it), SR9 are all pretty well Glocks under a different name, and they're all sh*t with the M&P being the closest thing to the real deal.

(3) As for Glocks and the IPSC/USPSA circuit, I don't care about gaming. Glocks are service guns, designed for defense of life, that is shooting other people. Accuracy needs to be effective for the intended role, and they're more than capable of the task. Running around ignoring the use of cover while wearing a flimsy holster and magazines displaced from the body is not realistic. Its gaming, its entertaining and still fun(shooting is always fun), but its not an accurate barometer for determining what is and is not a solid service pistol.

TDC

1- yes

2- so are you now telling me i can swap parts from my M&P 9 into a 17? Ow and M&P is an improvement, not a close copy :)

3- grapes are sour eh? of course its gaming cuz it rewards speed and accuracy over silly ritualistic 'techniques'. shooting a random stage under stress of time accurately enough to 'pacify' a paper target is of course not an accurate barometer of anything, nor is 10-20k rounds an average IPSC/USPSA gun fires every season... especially not of how much abuse a rig will take. i would say get off your ass and try it but i have a feeling you at some point did and wisely chose to save your ego the pain and decided to stay away :)
 
Cooper said that shooting as conducted under the auspice of the IPSC was to gun fighting as Olympic fencing was to sword fighting. In the end, he asked that his name no longer be associated with the organization.

 
Cooper said that shooting as conducted under the auspice of the IPSC was to gun fighting as Olympic fencing was to sword fighting. In the end, he asked that his name no longer be associated with the organization.

hiding behind other people's quotes is thing for you eh? btw i don't know who cooper is and i don't care, there are a ton of has-beens in every walk of life that get bitter when the world passes them by.

as per your sword fighting remark, umm yeah were not shooting blanks just so you know. i can see people having issues with open guns but since you like analogies, open guns/division in dynamic shooting is what F1 is to auto racing. that being said, there are other divisions like production, classic and standard which can be equated to (running with the analogy) amatuer lapping events and street racing :)

btw having seen your earlier posts about IPSC and arguement with a BB coordinator - quite acting like you know what your are talking about :)

PS: you fail at even quoting which is specially sad since this argument seems to be the highlight of your day lol
 
0w fu(k! i just realized I am arguing too, on the internet, with retards - i suck

sorry OP, i will stay out of your thread that i helped (hopefully only partially) derail.
 
Wow. I think we're all about done here since this thread got so derailed.

Thank you to everyone else who posted in a meaningful manner regarding the OP's original question, though.

The rest of you outta review the CGN General Posting rules [can be found under "Forum Rules" on the top toolbar above].

Thanks.

:canadaFlag:
-----------
NAA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom