So why are none of us Hunters talking about the 30 x 30 Intiative?

A person can only drive one vehicle at a time having 4 wont make more pollution. How is eating beef and meat bad? I still think Canadas contribution to pollution is small compared to China. Is there a simple comparison? Like number of vehicles and factories. What are the biggest makers of pollution?
 
I’m always intrigued whenever people criticize our standard of living in the west. I’m not saying we don’t have lavish lifestyles compared to 3rd world countries, but do they actually make the “necessary” sacrifices themselves, or just expect everyone else to live a meager existence. Rules for thee and not for me comes to mind.
 
A person can only drive one vehicle at a time having 4 wont make more pollution. How is eating beef and meat bad? I still think Canadas contribution to pollution is small compared to China. Is there a simple comparison? Like number of vehicles and factories. What are the biggest makers of pollution?

China and India dwarf the rest of the world in pollution. Our greenness always come whinging back with "per capita we pollute more". And we drive cars, heat homes, cook food, produce move goods, and farm. All sins in their eyes. It really has become a religion, with its own zealots. - dan
 
Don’t watch tv, and I don’t read infowars or other garbage either.

I watch it all, except infowars, don't know that one but it's likely good if you mock it lol. Best you start getting informed then. Thank you for finally saying in a round about way that you are manipulated rather than informed. Either that or you're part of the bad in this world currently being exposed. Going with manipulated. You've been on one leg in this conversation the entire time. Hey, they just lit Quebec on fire, all at once lol...totally natural, nothing to see here, business is going to be good for you as long as they same criminals in charge. So carry on mocking the informed people to try and stay as comfortable as you can on that precarious perch. It's going to be a hard landing for you.
 
I'd remind everyone on all sides that arguing with a bad faith actor (or someone you believe is one) is futile.

This means it's better to just insult each other instead of cherry picking data and writing schizotypical screeds

Blakeyboy if you want to reply to me on this one write anything important in the first few paragraphs because I don't think I've ever made it past three

only the first line of that last reply was for you, you don't say much so don't need to give you much, you just provided an easy opportunity to air out the latest observations for those reading and absorbing as much info here as possible so they can process it to their own conclusions

we're unpacking a lot here because 30x30 is tied to a lot, that means multiple topics, multiple runs into the ditch to see the weeds etc., you have no interest in keeping up or adding value, just stick up for the couple guys here on their very precarious perches
 
A person can only drive one vehicle at a time having 4 wont make more pollution. How is eating beef and meat bad? I still think Canadas contribution to pollution is small compared to China. Is there a simple comparison? Like number of vehicles and factories. What are the biggest makers of pollution?

It’s not four cars per person and only driving one, it’s that we have four times as many cars per person as the Chinese, and even more than that ratio compared to India. We have just under 1 car per person, china has 1 car per 4 people or less. Even if it were four cars per person, those aren’t string free to build in resources used, and emissions to make the steel and plastics.

While some say we can’t look at our own consumption and China and India are the problem, the problem lies in them aspiring to live the heavy consumption life we do. We’d need five earths of resources to elevate everyone to our ‘standard’ of living (consumption). I do feel we should do better. Saying we shouldn’t even think about it because we live here and take part is like saying don’t ever vote, there’s no point and it’s all going to happen anyways.

Again, I do feel climate change is a runaway train. I feel we’re at a triage point on our planet, and they best thing we can do is work to protect high value habitat and protect biodiversity and wilderness from rampant resource extraction. I had a constant battle against logging and mining exploration applications in my tenure, and when I showed up in person to lodge my protest was politely dismissed.
 
So there are 9X as many cars in China as Canada.

So I need to eat bugs so someone is China can eat steak? How does that work?
 
Now show us the west, in particular BC, that’s where I work and the observations are coming from, on temps, and fires and what we’ve been talking about.

Much of Canada is swamp spruce that’s designed to burn, much of BC is doug fir, cedar, and alpine that isn’t.

As a guy that spends a lot of time flying over the country, what effect do you think that beetle kill has had on the increasing prevalence of forest fires in BC? I remember when I got to the Williams Lake country over 20 years ago beetle kill was a relatively new thing but the mills weren't taking it which left huge tracts of pine dead standing. Are there still large areas of dead standing, or blowdown, beetle kill? That seems like it would definitely contribute to making for some hot fires.
 
As a guy that spends a lot of time flying over the country, what effect do you think that beetle kill has had on the increasing prevalence of forest fires in BC? I remember when I got to the Williams Lake country over 20 years ago beetle kill was a relatively new thing but the mills weren't taking it which left huge tracts of pine dead standing. Are there still large areas of dead standing, or blowdown, beetle kill? That seems like it would definitely contribute to making for some hot fires.

Why not look on Google Earth or the NASA site?
 
As a guy that spends a lot of time flying over the country, what effect do you think that beetle kill has had on the increasing prevalence of forest fires in BC? I remember when I got to the Williams Lake country over 20 years ago beetle kill was a relatively new thing but the mills weren't taking it which left huge tracts of pine dead standing. Are there still large areas of dead standing, or blowdown, beetle kill? That seems like it would definitely contribute to making for some hot fires.

Yea it’s a big factor in interior fires. It’s viewed as cleanup, and rightly left to burn, long as it’s not threatening people’s homes and property which it often does needless to say. Unfortunately it takes the mature Douglas fir stands interspersed with it out too that would otherwise be very fire resistant.

The beetles need -30 for a week to freeze kill, which is getting rarer and rarer, and that line’s pushing further and further north as things warm up. The other thing with beetle kill is it only burns one way; big. Green trees will actually burn better initially believe it or not, the oils and moisture in them flash off and burn readily when they’re heat stressed. It takes more to get a beetle kill fire going, but once it takes hold it’s got one speed.

mIwHYls.jpg
 
So some deer yesterday eating in a burn from a few weeks ago, the water dumped on it, and the rain, was enough to green it up with the best eats for deer.
 
While some say we can’t look at our own consumption and China and India are the problem, the problem lies in them aspiring to live the heavy consumption life we do. We’d need five earths of resources to elevate everyone to our ‘standard’ of living (consumption). I do feel we should do better. Saying we shouldn’t even think about it because we live here and take part is like saying don’t ever vote, there’s no point and it’s all going to happen anyways.

Talk is cheap. Out of curiosity what have you done to limit consumption in your life? Cut meat out of your diet? Stopped using plastics? Limit of 1 vehicle per household? How about them nasty fossil fuels? Let’s hear it. Lead by example, right?
 
Unfortunately I worked on the Lytton fire, the origin was nothing so movie plot worthy, it was a train sparking in extreme temps. It was half a degree shy of +50 (121F) the peak day and that was everywhere including what the helicopters indicated on the move. That’s also the temp limit for operation of most helicopters used to fight fire. The fire wasn’t lit to burn down a Dr’s office or anything worthy of a Steven Seagal flick, it was started by a train. Not an uncommon occurrence in hot weather, I just fought a string of rail line fires started in Alberta the same way and am likely headed back.

Last year in Boston Bar fighting fire, again very high temps, very long, and much later than usual. My seasons on fires used to reliably be the middle of July to the first week of September, with many years ‘off’ in between. Now this year it starts late April, and went til Nov last in the fall. Resources are stretched, old growth that’s survived hundreds of years of fires is burning completely, and there aren’t enough crews. It’s unfortunately, not at all propaganda, if anything the state of it is underreported.


Has the Lytton fire been conclusively linked to railways? There has only been speculation, last I heard.

The Transportation Safety Board found no links to train or railway activity, and I don't believe an official cause has ever been released.

All that seems to be agreed upon is that the fire was human caused. Most wildfires are human caused, often intentionally and often maliciously.
 
Last edited:
What has meat got to do with it? Less hunting? Cow farts? What

It's just that we're bad, that's all. The whole world is a victim of European colonialism. Before the Europeans came along all other cultures were exemplary stewards of their environments. Everyone knows that East Asians eat a lot of fish and seafood in general, which is why they treat their waters with such dignity that puts us to shame. We should be sending them cheques as well, in gratitude, in addition to the foreign aid we send to countries like China, who's economy is ten times larger than ours.

https://e360.yale.edu/features/how-chinas-expanding-fishing-fleet-is-depleting-worlds-oceans
 
Our per capita emissions are way higher than China or India though. We need to clean up our own backyard before we have any right to be telling others what they need to do.

It also ignores the part where Western countries got wealthy during a time where environmental standards were non-existent. It is unreasonable for the West to tell developing nations they can't do the same #### we did to get wealthy unless we are going to subsidize them with the wealth we created by polluting the #### out of the planet.

Canada is a huge and mostly cold country, with a low population. It makes sense that per capita we use more energy.

But Canadians could all stop driving cars and it wouldn't make a difference globally, so per capita is pretty irrelevant.
 
Really our per person pollution is higher than China and India. Thats interesting. How do they figure that? Guess if we had more people the ratio would go down. How about polution per area

It's because China has a huge population and Canada has a small population.

China is a huge source of pollution, Canada is a drop in the ocean.


carbonfootprint_shareofworldkoreareport.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom