So I picked up a 90-two at the beginning of the year. The reason I chose a 90-two was because at that time I had a hard on for a Beretta in 9mm. The reason I chose a 90-two and not a 92 is because I was worried about grip size. I also liked the fact the 90-two is lighter then a 92 and it also has a pic rail and internal recoil buffer. As it turns out the 90-two with slim grips is a perfect size for my hand.
Looking at the evolution of the 92 series, the 90-two was supposed to be the upgraded 92 with a rail. However it never caught on and is now discontinued. I pretty much got the last new one in Canada.
The 90-two has now been replaced by the 92A1 which is a inferior product in my opinion. So the question Is, how did Beretta go wrong with the 90-two? Is it as something as simple of aesthetics? I got nothing but praise for it as a pistol.
Looking at the evolution of the 92 series, the 90-two was supposed to be the upgraded 92 with a rail. However it never caught on and is now discontinued. I pretty much got the last new one in Canada.
The 90-two has now been replaced by the 92A1 which is a inferior product in my opinion. So the question Is, how did Beretta go wrong with the 90-two? Is it as something as simple of aesthetics? I got nothing but praise for it as a pistol.