Somebody 'splain ....

I'm not sure that the Major/Minor debate has as much relevance today as it did 40 years ago. Now that, apparently, the modern high-velocity hollowpoints have calibers like the 9x19 delivering reliable stopping power, why beat yourself up? According to various sources, Massad Ayoob for example, many U.S. Law Enforcement Agencies are switching back to the 9 mm from the .40 or .45 simply because it's working fine now at stopping fights. So why beat up the guns? Why force the people to endure the recoil and fight the flinch? From that point alone, just having a minimum Power Factor like, say 150, in any match should be fine. Supposedly the Hornady 135 grain Critical Duty +P shoots out at 1,110 fps so that's a 150 Power Factor. Fine, it's probably enough. Leave it there and move on. Or even just use 125 as a minimum. If a person can shoot a 125 PF load he or she can easily come up to a 150 PF loading in an emergency, it's not that much different. quote]


A 200 gr .45 SWC only needs 850 fps to make a 170 PF; a .45 230 gr at 750 makes 172 PF. Neither one is particularly punishing to shooter or gun. I shoot both in my 'Commander' length 1911s regularly. At the last IPSC Qualifier I attended, a load consisting of 4 grs Tight Group/200 SWC scored just under Major PF from a 'Commander', just making it from a 5" Gov't model. Upping the charge just .2 of a gr would let it squeak by from a 'Commander'.

I've never had the opportunity to shoot bowling pins of tables, so can't comment on their use for that purpose.

It would not surprise me if the IPSC 170 Major PF was lowered even further from it's original 175, which btw, even the Detonics guys used to achieve with their little hand cannon.
 
I'm curious about some of the nomenclature: for example 170 PF? Clearly it has to do with muzzle velocity and energy and I reload so there is no confusion relative to those terms. Major and Minor are in reference to classes dictated by velocity/energy it seems.

I like shooting revolvers so this sort of thing interests me in the world of shooting where competition (formal and informal) tend to cater to pistols.
 
I guess it's about time we shared the data and clarified the jargon .....

The "Power Factor" Is established by multiplying the weight of the bullet by the velocity, divided by 1000. for example: 200 gr bullet x 850 fps velocity =170000 divided by 1000 =170 PF.

That is right on the IPSC Major PF, so it would behoove a shooter to slightly better that.

The idea is to discourage light loads. In Cowboy Action shooting with a much lower power factor, we tried to beat the 'gamers' by putting in steel targets that required at least a factory 158 gr .38 Spl. to knock over. The 'gamers' got around this by loading accordingly, ensuring that a warmer load was next under the hammer for the steel targets.

Cal's Mexican amigo's solution dispenses with the chronograph and goes entirely by knock down power. In IPSC, steel 'Pepper Poppers' are calibrated to fall when hit in the top portion of the target with a Minor PF load. Hits lower on the target may or may not knock it over.

In the early days, the PF was established by using a "Power Pendulum", a steel plate the size of the old IPSC "B" zone that mover a pointer when hit. Factory ammo was used to establish Major and Minor PF. Your gun and ammo had to equal or beat that.
 
Last edited:
I guess it's about time we shared the data and clarified the jargon .....

The "Power Factor" Is established by multiplying the weight of the bullet by the velocity, divided by 1000. for example: 200 gr bullet x 850 fps velocity =170000 divided by 1000 =170 PF.

That is right on the IPSC Major PF, so it would behoove a shooter to slightly better that.

The idea is to discourage light loads. In Cowboy Action shooting with a much lower power factor, we tried to beat the 'gamers' by putting in steel targets that required at least a factory 158 gr .38 Spl. to knock over. The 'gamers' got around this by loading accordingly, ensuring that a warmer load was next under the hammer for the steel targets.

Cal's Mexican amigo's solution dispenses with the chronograph and goes entirely by knock down power. In IPSC, steel 'Pepper Poppers' are calibrated to fall when hit in the top portion of the target with a Minor PF load. Hits lower on the target may or may not knock it over.

In the early days, the PF was established by using a "Power Pendulum", a steel plate the size of the old IPSC "B" zone that mover a pointer when hit. Factory ammo was used to establish Major and Minor PF. Your gun and ammo had to equal or beat that.

Thank you, I get it now and the missing blanks of this thread are filled. Hopefully I'll see some guys practicing this discipline at the range sometime.
 
Something new shooters shooting the 38spl should know. IDPA reduced the PF for the 38spl from 125 to 105. Why? Well HQ tested 17 different factory loadings for the 38spl excluding +9 and +P+ cartridges. The PF's ran from 95 to 115. The sport was never designed to force members into reloading to participate. In short the idea was to have shooters shooting readily accessible factory ammunition. Clearly the 125 PF was not representative of readily available ammo. They decided on 105. I post this to at least let new shooters who may feel they can jump the 38spl using K frame guns safely. At 125 - 130 you are already into +P loadings for the caliber. You won't see significant in accuracy, if any by pushing the cartridge. Just use some common sense.

Take Care

Bob
 
Holy Cow! They already had the BUG class (Back Up Gun), so this surprises me. A 158 gr .38 Spl. bullet needed 800 fps to make the 125 PF.

When our IDPA section was active, I shot my 2-1/2" .357 snubs with loads that met or exceeded the 125 PF from a 4" .357 M66 barrel at the time. I was allowed as not many in Canada owned guns that fell into the BUG category.

Like I said earlier, it will not come as a surprise if IPSC follows suit in lowering PFs.
 
Well IDPA changed the PF several years ago so I would not bexpect IPSC to change it any time soon. FYI BUG Division PF is 95. What were you allowed to do? Max barrel length for BUG is 3.5". Your gun made BUG Division rules provided it made weight of 25oz. If it doesn't you were just shooting SSR not BUG.

Take Care

Bob
 
Last edited:
I don’t hear any chatter about IPSC lowering PF values.

I’m not a revo guy, but I’ve heard some guns can have a harder time hitting PF values if using borderline semi-auto loads. So I can see IDPA’s point.
 
Well IDPA changed the PF several years ago so I would not bexpect IPSC to change it any time soon. FYI BUG Division PF is 95. What were you allowed to do? Max barrel length for BUG is 3.5". Your gun made BUG Division rules provided it made weight of 25oz. If it doesn't you were just shooting SSR not BUG.

Take Care

Bob

I suspect that my load made 95 PF and then some. My K frame 2-1/2" .357s definitely made the weight requirement. Allowing me to shoot a BUG was deemed a courtesy as no one else had a prohib revolver.
 
Back
Top Bottom