I'm not sure that the Major/Minor debate has as much relevance today as it did 40 years ago. Now that, apparently, the modern high-velocity hollowpoints have calibers like the 9x19 delivering reliable stopping power, why beat yourself up? According to various sources, Massad Ayoob for example, many U.S. Law Enforcement Agencies are switching back to the 9 mm from the .40 or .45 simply because it's working fine now at stopping fights. So why beat up the guns? Why force the people to endure the recoil and fight the flinch? From that point alone, just having a minimum Power Factor like, say 150, in any match should be fine. Supposedly the Hornady 135 grain Critical Duty +P shoots out at 1,110 fps so that's a 150 Power Factor. Fine, it's probably enough. Leave it there and move on. Or even just use 125 as a minimum. If a person can shoot a 125 PF load he or she can easily come up to a 150 PF loading in an emergency, it's not that much different. quote]
A 200 gr .45 SWC only needs 850 fps to make a 170 PF; a .45 230 gr at 750 makes 172 PF. Neither one is particularly punishing to shooter or gun. I shoot both in my 'Commander' length 1911s regularly. At the last IPSC Qualifier I attended, a load consisting of 4 grs Tight Group/200 SWC scored just under Major PF from a 'Commander', just making it from a 5" Gov't model. Upping the charge just .2 of a gr would let it squeak by from a 'Commander'.
I've never had the opportunity to shoot bowling pins of tables, so can't comment on their use for that purpose.
It would not surprise me if the IPSC 170 Major PF was lowered even further from it's original 175, which btw, even the Detonics guys used to achieve with their little hand cannon.


















































