Something new for 10/22

It looks very intersting,but it would be deemed prohibited because it takes one pull of the trigger for the multiple burst. Therefor it can not be imported into Canada.

I wonder how the action/barrel movement would affect the accuracy also.
 
Last edited:
from thier FAQ page
Q: How does it work?

A: The Linear Motion Assembly replaces the factory barrel clamp on the shooter's 10/22®. The LMA attaches to the custom Akins Accelerator™ stock. The LMA allows the barreled action to move back and forth within the stock, traveling on guide rods.

When fired, the barreled action recoils rearward, the firearm cycles as normal and then the spring drives the barreled action forward again. If the shooter leaves his finger in place, bridging the finger stops on each side of the trigger, his finger pulls the trigger again as the trigger comes forward.

just out of curiosity ? if the trigger is being cycled each time for each shot how is it that being fired continuasly with one trigger pull?
 
Any device that makes a semi fire faster is prohib; whether it is one pull of the trigger is irrelevant. There are a variety of trippers, actuators, cranks, etc. All prohib.
 
SignGuy said:
from thier FAQ page


just out of curiosity ? if the trigger is being cycled each time for each shot how is it that being fired continuasly with one trigger pull?

im guessing there are springs to push the barrel/action fowards again so really you dont even move your finger you just hold it in the same spot and the recoil/spring action is doing all the work and you are just along for the ride.

at least thats how i understand it:confused:
 
The device works on recoil. It's a built in bumpfiring mechanism. You finger stays stationary while the entire action racks back and forth.

Under U.S law as long as the trigger is being pulled it is not a machine gun. As tiriaq stated Canadian law is written more vaguely to incorporate any device made in attempt to discharge a firearm in rapid succession.
 
I seen a 10/22 that "reset" the trigger when the bolt blew back. Damn thing would shoot 1000rpm, and was supposidly canada legal. You had to pull the trigger each time to fire it, the bolt simply reset the trigger forward.

I talked with an RCMP firearms tech, and he deemed it should be legal, because it's not "actuating the trigger in a manner that causes the firearm to discharge".

Would make an interesting project to get a legal classification on it.

I'm in on way too many class action lawsuits right now, and have too many projects submitted that are undergoing "classification" :D Maybe sometime in the future.
 
i guess we should all have our trigger fingers licenced and registered under a new 12.8 class as a device capable of making a semi auto fire fast Sheesh

tiriaq said:
Any device that makes a semi fire faster is prohib; whether it is one pull of the trigger is irrelevant. There are a variety of trippers, actuators, cranks, etc. All prohib.
where abouts is that in the CC for personal refernce and letter writing ?
 
tiriaq said:
Any device that makes a semi fire faster is prohib; whether it is one pull of the trigger is irrelevant. There are a variety of trippers, actuators, cranks, etc. All prohib.
Not true. It specifically says in the CC something like "discharges more then one round per pull of the trigger", and for it to be a prohib actuator device, it has to directly move the trigger/action to cause it to fire. A lighter trigger with short travel allows you to fire a semi faster, and none of those parts are prohib.

My fast semi:


CLICK FOR VIDEO


1.2lb trigger, 1/8" movement, no overtravel, tuned mags and action, all legal :D
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom