Spectre Ballistics Light Practical Carbine - NR Receiver Set

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe a pump system would be superior?

Otherwise, there are far better bolt action rifles. That video looked painful.

Far better bolt action rifles that accept existing AR parts? That must be news to Spectre. I guess they’ve wasted all that time and energy for no good reason.
 
Wouldn't it be smarter to make a receiver like that with AICS magazine? At least then it would have no magazine restrictions.

If you're gonna rake that bolt every time at least have the opportunity to do it endlessly. Or at least for 30 rounds.
 
The primary target for these receivers are AR/black rifle owners who have been threatened with confiscation. Because it gives them a plan B of legally using their AR barrels, triggers, stocks and handguards if the retards go ahead with a ban.
Considering every AR owner owns at least 86 AR15 mags, creating an AR parts-compatible NR receiver set that uses AR mags is the only thing that makes sense.
 
Wouldn't it be smarter to make a receiver like that with AICS magazine? At least then it would have no magazine restrictions.
If you're gonna rake that bolt every time at least have the opportunity to do it endlessly. Or at least for 30 rounds.

No.

That's completely and utterly NOT the goal of this project.
 
I don't know if it's too late to suggest, but wouldn't it be better if you can put a spring behind the carrier so it can actually push the bolt forward, just without any mechanism for the carrier to be functioned "semi-automatically"?

That would allow you to 1) just let go of the charging handle to chamber the round, and 2) allow the carrier to stay where it is while chambered.

The action of pushing the handle back forward looks a little silly to me.

This is absolutely needed and most straight pulls of this type (Troy SAR included) have a spring to assist in forward inertia.
Please take this into consideration Spectre.
 
I would rather hand in a pile of molten steel and aluminum before I turn any semi's into bolt guns. My bosses brother did that when they came for his Stainless .357 he got from his uncle, stuck it in the furnace and wrapped the barrel in a 180. Said the cops jaws hit the floor when they saw it. "If I cant have it, no one can".
 
I would rather hand in a pile of molten steel and aluminum before I turn any semi's into bolt guns. My bosses brother did that when they came for his Stainless .357 he got from his uncle, stuck it in the furnace and wrapped the barrel in a 180. Said the cops jaws hit the floor when they saw it. "If I cant have it, no one can".

If your boss' brother had the ability to do that, he could have easily unscrewed the barrel and handed that in, then rebarreled with something 105+. His approach seems a silly, wasteful, and expensive way to make a point.

I've spent money on my AR, and rather than convert that investment into scrap via the Blue Flame of Anger, I'd just as soon hand them a stripped lower receiver and tuck everything else into a bolt-action chassis.

But maybe I'm weird.
 
If any of my lowers have to get turned in then they will go completely stripped with #### YOU TRUDEAU engraved on them.

Nice to have an option to build something with the remaining parts.
 
I keep hearing that the “lower receiver” is the only serialized part so you can strip everything and just turn in the receiver. Is it that simple? Or do you have to re-classify it before you strip it (to deactivated or a restricted part) so you can keep the barrel and stuff. Our registration cards give barrel length and brand of complete firearm unless its registered as parts.
Does anyone know?
 
I keep hearing that the “lower receiver” is the only serialized part so you can strip everything and just turn in the receiver. Is it that simple? Or do you have to re-classify it before you strip it (to deactivated or a restricted part) so you can keep the barrel and stuff. Our registration cards give barrel length and brand of complete firearm unless its registered as parts.
Does anyone know?

NZ prohibited all parts so it is impossible to say. Mine are registered as receivers only....
 
I keep hearing that the “lower receiver” is the only serialized part so you can strip everything and just turn in the receiver. Is it that simple? Or do you have to re-classify it before you strip it (to deactivated or a restricted part) so you can keep the barrel and stuff. Our registration cards give barrel length and brand of complete firearm unless its registered as parts.
Does anyone know?

Only time will tell what direction the Libtard's go one this. If there is enough publicity on their intensions you may just have enough time to deregister it as a complete rifle and re-register just the lower before the bill gets past. Pretty tough call on their part to suggest those spare parts used to make up the exactB] same complete gun. In fact I'll probably sell all my part to Mike in Canmore.
 
I'm thinking the Libs have some pretty big problems right now and maybe the gun problems will be put to the back burner for a longer time while they try to come up for air as they seem to be drowning right now.
 
I wish our police would be more like the Vermont State police and just publicly refuse to enforce such a ban. I am willing to bet a good percentage of Police are also AR owners and sport shooters.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom