Sport Hunting Under Siege as Major Airlines Cease Trophy Transportation

After the two scum bags in the news lately what can people expect. All they do is give hunters a bad name when they kill just for the fun of it and animals that are not supposed to be shot in the first place. I mean a pet lion and a giraffe really takes the cake of stupidity.
 
I guess we should stop posting hunting pics on social media. Right now we're witnessing a witch-hunt and guess who's the witch...
 
That's the post I was waiting for with bated breath.

That's a dandy alright, especially coming from a trapper. Laugh2

You need to set the traps with in the chicken house against the walls where you think they are coming in and then lean boards over the trap to keep the chickens off of them. The boards will also funnel them into the traps. If you set enough one might work. I have had the same weasel problem and got him this way. I have a constant problem with coons as well. Skunks are never a problem as they don't climb and I put my chicken house on stilts just for this reason. Then I control where they have to try and get in and catch them before they do damage.
Victor gopher traps and the rat traps worked for me. One of the outside traps I even caught a mink. This was in Alberta and there was no water for miles. Just more critters to watch out for here.
 
The real question is whether or not the hunt was ethical. All I've heard is that the animal was lured out of protected territory, wounded, tracked, and killed. They tracked their quarry for forty hours - which brings the quality of shot into question. A high percentage shot would have dispatched the animal much quicker. it's a question I would ask If I was investigating. was the shot taken to wound for fear of losing the animal or a kill shot gone wrong due to movement, tree branch, etc?
As presented it would seem the hunt might be unethical and therefore, damaging to the reputation of ethical hunters everywhere. The argument needs to reflect that rather than just being about hunting in general. Jimmy Kimmel even made that distinction on his show.
If proven to be an unethical hunt then all hunters should be just as outraged as the general public. Unethical hunts don't help hunters or the hunted.
 
Here is another article taken from "the Truth About Guns" site.

Actual Zimbabwean to Anti-Hunting Types: FOAD By Johannes Paulsen on August 5, 2015
billboard_400w.jpg

Zimbabwe, nee Southern Rhodesia, has always been a hard place to live. Goodwell Nzou would know. The doctoral student at Wake Forest University hails from that country, and is well aware of the dangers the wilds of his native land present. At age 11, he lost his right leg to a snakebite . . .
When the recent kerfuffle over an American hunter killing a wild animal started boiling over, his initial reaction was quite different from that of the pampered, privileged folks in the West. He recounts the tale in an op-ed published Tuesday in the New York Times.
When I turned on the news and discovered that the messages were about a lion killed by an American dentist, the village boy inside me instinctively cheered: One lion fewer to menace families like mine.
My excitement was doused when I realized that the lion killer was being painted as the villain. I faced the starkest cultural contradiction I’d experienced during my five years studying in the United States.
Did all those Americans signing petitions understand that lions actually kill people? That all the talk about Cecil being “beloved” or a “local favorite” was media hype? Did Jimmy Kimmel choke up because Cecil was murdered or because he confused him with Simba from “The Lion King”?
In my village in Zimbabwe, surrounded by wildlife conservation areas, no lion has ever been beloved, or granted an affectionate nickname. They are objects of terror….
The American tendency to romanticize animals…and to jump onto a hashtag train has turned an ordinary situation — there were 800 lions legally killed over a decade by well-heeled foreigners who shelled out serious money to prove their prowess — into what seems to my Zimbabwean eyes an absurdist circus.
PETA is calling for the hunter to be hanged. Zimbabwean politicians are accusing the United States of staging Cecil’s killing as a “ploy” to make our country look bad. And Americans who can’t find Zimbabwe on a map are applauding the nation’s demand for the extradition of the dentist, unaware that a baby elephant was reportedly slaughtered for our president’s most recent birthday banquet.
We Zimbabweans are left shaking our heads, wondering why Americans care more about African animals than about African people.
The plight of Zimbabwe’s people goes beyond threats of mere animal attacks. Though the actors and their politics have changed over the years, the land has been ruled by a racist, authoritarian regime, willing to use deadly force to cling to power at least since the days of British imperialism.
In fact, when she speaks in public, writer Alexandra Fuller — who spent her childhood and adolescence in the country — makes a point of reading a list of political prisoners from Africa, to remind everyone of the plight and oppression of people who live in the continent that was once her home. Naturally, Zimbabwe is one of the many countries whose prisoners are featured on the list. To my knowledge, she hasn’t been in danger of running out of names.
But instead of trying to understand the reality of life on the ground in Zimbabwe, and instead of trying to change something that actually is hurting real people protesting the oppressive Zimbabwean government, many Americans have been willing to mindlessly jump on a bandwagon, protesting trophy hunting because it apparently conflicts with the Disney-esque vision Africa, its people and its wildlife that they prefer to believe in.
Apparently, the mob needs more targets for its five-minute hate. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported on Tuesday that a Pittsburgh-area physician who treats cancer patients is being accused of “killing a lion on what may have been an illegal hunt.” The Zimbabwean government apparently is accusing Dr. Jan Seski of participating in an “illegal hunt” in April 2015. The usual social justice warrior types, bravely willing to take the word of an oppressive government, have attacked Dr. Seski in various social media (leaving a load of false reviews of his oncology practice on Yelp, for instance.)
Can this story get any more asinine? Stay tuned….
 
Back
Top Bottom