I hadn’t really thought of the Kowa. I’ve seen the name occasionally but never really checked them out. Is it really comparable to a swaro? It seems inexpensive. Warranty? And can I use a reticle?
between kowa and razor for similar specs/magnification/objective which would you choose?
My immediate use is I want to see bullet holes at 200m. Then when I move I’d like to be able to work with it up to about 500 on my own land hopefully. And I want to do some 1000 yard stuff through Ora sometime soon.
Short answer...it depends.
Long answer; the perceived image quality has as much to do with the actual scope as it does the environment and individual user. If you’re using it for 200yds in broad daylight, they’ll all work and you likely won’t notice large differences. 1000yds at dawn or dusk, flat light, in haze, etc is a whole different game. Age and your eyes natural ability also play a role...generally younger eyes and those with perfect natural vision more easily adapt and don’t notice as much difference. Even with all factors being equal, two different people will perceive things differently.
Is the Kowa on par with the Swaro? In a technical sense, maybe. Which Kowa and which Swaro are you comparing? But from the users perspective only you can decide that. Don’t be fooled by all the marketing. There are very few manufacturers of optical glass, so most scope manufacturers are buying from the same sources. To a point you get what you pay for. After that you’re also paying for a name.
The reason I recommend PeleeWings is they will pull out the scopes and let you view them side by side - outdoors. Additionally their primary clientele are birdwatchers and stargazers, folks who forget more in a day than most gun folks learn all year about optics.
As to which I would buy, the Razor or Kowa? I use a Kowa 663. I have no idea about warranty as I haven’t had anything go wrong. Can’t dispute that Vortex stands behind their products...it’s nice peace of mind.
Last edited:




















































