Hey, Hannibal! Whatcha' smokin' boy? There are TWO PPS-50s pictured here, and I don't know if you noticed or not, but BOTH have the wood you say ain't there!!! (?)
I owned an original Russki PPSh several decades ago and there too I had both drum and stick mags for it. It too had wood in front of the mag well! Only ones I've ever seen had that wood. Can't figure what gun you're talking about. Got any pics of it?
Price I quoted is par for the course - HERE. Collectors don't see too many Piettas available down here. There were always lots of gun bargains up yonder, compared to here! I spent 18 years in BC and REALLY enjoyed collecting guns and antique .22rf ammo boxes. Sold out
almost everything to Tom Bongalis in Vancouver before returning South.
As for a pic REALLY showing this PPS-50's snout, here you go.
Best regards ~ ~ ~ mauser
I’m smoking only tobacco, as I have some allergic reaction to pot.
I wish I could smoke pot instead of this tobacco sh!t
(as I live in BC, the Western capital of pot)
Well, I was talking about the original name of the Russian SMG's,
not about the Squires or Pietta product denomination.
The Rusky you say you had was probably a PPD
(if you say it had wood in front of the mag).
There is always some confusion about the Russian SMG’s of that era.
PPD, PPSh and PPS are 3 different groups of SMG’s.
To support the statements in my previous post
and to try to dissipate the confusion:
PPD (Deghtyarev) is the original Russian SMG
that your .22 gun resembles the most (at least IMO),
more precisely the PPD-40,
(if you look at the way the mag is hold in the receiver).
Russians copied some Bergmann design while
slightly modding the feed.
http://world.guns.ru/smg/smg01-e.htm
PPSh (Shpagin) did not have wood in the front of the mag.
It was designed in a hurry and rushed into production in the
urging conditions of the early war.
It was the “workhorse” SMG of the Red Army.
http://world.guns.ru/smg/smg02-e.htm
PPS (Sudaev) did not have wood at all (stamped and machined
metal only, heavy influenced by the most modern
German way of thinking in firearms engineering of that time).
It was copied by a whole bunch after the war,
Finland, Spain, China, Vietnam, Hungary
and even W-Germany among many others.
http://world.guns.ru/smg/smg03-e.htm
I have also tried (with my modest abilities
and pics stolen from the net)
to explain these differences in post #22
of this very interesting thread:
http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=234098&page=3
Thank you for the integral pic of your gun
Thank you Tiriaq for your legendary help and valuable input,
like you always did in this forum
