Really? I did wonder about that, but there seems to be an awful lot of dressed up 10/22s that are free floated. I was under the impression, form what I have read over on rimfire central, that free floating a 10/22 barrel is a good thing as long as the barrel isn't heavy enough to make it sag... but you can't believe everything that you read on the internet I guess!
I am aware that a lot of people do that (they shouldn't).
First, for freefloating ANY kind of barrel attached to the Ruger 10/22,
you need the second hold-down on the receiver
(if you say you visit rimfirecentral, you know what that is).
Secondly, even in set-ups that use the second hold-down on the receiver,
the slip-fit barrel cannot be realistically free-floated, because the so-called "droop" will:
1. make most scopes run out of adjustment,
2. put a huge amount of stress on the receiver,
3. make a poor contact between barrel and receiver (less rigid),
resulting in an un-stable barrel (poor accuracy).
If you want to free float the 10/22 barrel,
then you need a second hold-down AND a threaded barrel.
And even then,
if you want results,
you should go with a light(er) barrel
and a strong, very rigid aftermarket receiver.
There are, of course, some compromises, but few.
One of them is the bedding of the first 3" of barrel in front of the receiver
and freefloating the rest of it
(yes, I know it does not apply to SR22).
Most people who free-floated their threaded 10/22 barrels
on OEM Ruger receivers are not very thrilled by the results.
People who bedded seem to be happier.
People who did both say they prefer bedding.
I started to experiment right now
with a special-purpose (dedicated) threaded receiver,
(that is more than just a regular receiver with a taped barrel hole)
Results in few weeks.