There has to be SOME obvious lineage between the Mk3 and it's predecessor, the Mk2. It has been determined that Side-Charging is a lineage requirement, just like dual Operating/Guide Rods. To change even more risks not getting a "Child FRT " based on the continuous R18 lineage. The problem is that the RCMP Lab's determinations are subjective and nobody really knows where they will draw the line. If the revised rifle doesn't "qualify" as an R18 anymore, then it runs a much greater risk of being classified as a variant of something prohibited, like say, a SIG MCX...
So, all of that to say, the Side Charging is here to stay, with an aftermarket folding Charging Handle for those who want one.
The rest of your desired enhancements are doable, but would increase production costs. The intent is to provide Canadians with a well-designed, reliable, reasonably accurate and durable sporting/utility rifle under $2K. It is NOT a SIG MCX, although what you propose would bring the Mk3 ever closer to that unknown variant "line". As a utility/sporting rifle, it is not expected nor required to withstand combat. So some compromise was necessary for multiple reasons you can probably deduce for yourself.
So, all of that to say, the Side Charging is here to stay, with an aftermarket folding Charging Handle for those who want one.
The rest of your desired enhancements are doable, but would increase production costs. The intent is to provide Canadians with a well-designed, reliable, reasonably accurate and durable sporting/utility rifle under $2K. It is NOT a SIG MCX, although what you propose would bring the Mk3 ever closer to that unknown variant "line". As a utility/sporting rifle, it is not expected nor required to withstand combat. So some compromise was necessary for multiple reasons you can probably deduce for yourself.
Last edited:
