Stop the RCMP!

KEEP IT SIMPLE - 10 rounds. Period.

Personally I think the whole thing is too complicated for citizens to properly understand and follow and for law enforcement to enforce!

If I had my way I would make it simple: Magazine Capacity would be 10 rounds regardless of type of firearm or ammo. This would mean the 10/22 - 25 round mags and drums would become(remain) prohibited and if you used a Beowulf mag in your AR with 14-15 rounds it would become prohibited (but if you used it in a beowulf that would be OK). On the other hand the SKS rifles could be de-pined and 10 round AR mags etc would be perfectly OK as well. On the shotgun side The rules might be a bit different, say 10 rounds of the maximum shell length the firearm is capable of holding so 10 3" for my mossberg.

I realize this would hurt a small number of people but it would HELP most everyone else and by making the rules SIMPLE, it can be easily argued it then improves PUBLIC SAFETY because it is easy to understand and enforce. (OK, we all no mag limits are bull#### for public safety but NO mag limits is just never going to happen!)

(There is a real world example of "use makes it prohibited" - I have a digital scanner. I am allowed to own it under my ham radio license. Legally I can use it to scan ham radio frequencies in both digital and analogue modes. IF I use it to scan anything other than ham radio, regardless of what it is, it becomes prohibited. In other words I can listen to local EMS on my analogue scanner no problem but if I do the exact same thing on my digital scanner then it's illegal and subject to a $250 fine. Now I realize it's kind of stupid, HOWEVER, it's an example of how you could own something like a Beowulf mag and it's legal until you put it in your AR and then it's not legal.)
 
NETMERC....you must work for the RCMP, support the NDP and follow turdeau because he is one of the best dressed world leaders.....Like nick 237...I DO NOT LIKE THAT IDEA. Stick to Ham radio.
 
We don't throw anyone or any rules that benefits the community under the bus. Magazine laws do not increase public safety. It should not be necessary to explain how they do not impact crime. Magazine laws are a liberal emotional response, typical of their platform.
 
If I had my way I would make it simple: Magazine Capacity would be 10 rounds regardless of type of firearm or ammo. This would mean the 10/22 - 25 round mags and drums would become(remain) prohibited and if you used a Beowulf mag in your AR with 14-15 rounds it would become prohibited

Well, thankfully you don't get to have it "your way", because quite frankly, "your way" sucks.
 
NETMERC....you must work for the RCMP, support the NDP and follow turdeau because he is one of the best dressed world leaders.....Like nick 237...I DO NOT LIKE THAT IDEA. Stick to Ham radio.

I'm not so sure that he'd do any better sticking to Ham radio: You do not need an amateur radio license to own or operate any type of scanner. Any scanner that can be bought in Canada can be used by anyone to tune into any frequency that it is capable of hearing. I think he's confusing the Industry Canada amateur radio rules that state it is OK for a licensed ham operator to own or build radio gear that is capable of transmitting outside of the amateur radio bands so long as they do not actually transmit on those out-of-band frequencies. ie. The restrictions are not on listening, but on transmitting.

As for magazine size restrictions, I like my idea better: Remove all magazine size restrictions for firearms license holders.
 
Yep, keep it really simple, magazine restrictions are proven ineffective nonsense. Remove mag restrictions of all kinds from the legislation!
 
We don't throw anyone or any rules that benefits the community under the bus. Magazine laws do not increase public safety. It should not be necessary to explain how they do not impact crime. Magazine laws are a liberal emotional response, typical of their platform.

You are aware that a lot of laws are based on emotions, and are completely unsupported by science, right? This true in many aspects of our lives touched by laws and regulations made in ottawa and the 10 provinces, not just about firearms.

As for the insanity of magazines regulations, which has reached its pinnacle with the 10/22 fiasco imho, it's still just the tip of the iceberg. Many laws and regulations are a lot more far fetched, we've just become so used to them that we don't notice them anymore, but anyone new to the firearms hobby automatically wonders why:
1-AR15 are restricted based on their look;
2-32acp and 25acp are prohibited based on someone's feeling in 1992 (that's just my best guess, nobody seems to really know wtf these guns are banned);
3-Ammos for 32acp and 25acp can still be sold;
4-Smith & Wessons's M&P15-22 (a rimfire rifle which shares 0 part with an AR-15) is restricted based on sharing a name and a look with the M&P15, which is restricted due to its look (it's an AR15);
5-The 10/22 charger is considered a pistol because Ruger calls it a pistol, although it has no characteristics of a pistol, but has every one of a rifle;
6-I'm not sure I want to keep going on.

A lot of these laws are based on the fear caused by mass shootings in another country.
 
You guys are dreaming. Even in some states where guns are a LOT more accepted than here have magazine restrictions. I have more chances of winning the lottery without buying a ticket than you guys have of changing the laws to allow unlimited magazines.

As a realistic person, I'd settle for laws based on science and reason, such as magazine capacities based on volume, not "amount of rounds the firearms it was originally designed for it can contain", classification based on physical characteristics instead of look, name and color of the firearm, and so on... But dreaming about removing all mag capacity regulation is just a dream.

Any update to firearm legislation and regulation will be toward restricting more and prohibiting more. If you want to make a move now, it would be to get handguns of all shape and size, cause the next update to firearm laws might very well be to move a lot of guns from restricted to prohibited status, create more 12x categories, and only those who previously owned those firearms will get those new statuses.
 
Please forgive me in my ignorance of the facts. Why is the RCMP or the firearms center have anything to do with anything regarding this issue. I thought we as gun owners have to follow the laws that are in the firearms act, have anything been changed or will be changed in the act regarding magazines?. If not then what right does the RCMP have to tell us anything if its contrary to the firearms act, they enforce the laws not write them right?.
 
Please forgive me in my ignorance of the facts. Why is the RCMP or the firearms center have anything to do with anything regarding this issue. I thought we as gun owners have to follow the laws that are in the firearms act, have anything been changed or will be changed in the act regarding magazines?. If not then what right does the RCMP have to tell us anything if its contrary to the firearms act, they enforce the laws not write them right?.

They have been "Authorized" by the present Liberal Gov't to be the go-to experts with Firearms Rules here in Canada.
 
Back
Top Bottom