Supermarine Spitfires and the Browning machine gun

Russians generally didn't have a very good opinion about UK made airplanes and tanks.

You have to remember that equipment used on Eastern Front was put through a lot hasher use due to for example:
It wasn't a matter of harsher use. Even in the ETO and MTO few aircraft lasted even 200 hours of operation before being lost or damaged beyond repair. In places like Malta few aircraft lasted 100 hours of ops.

The Russians primarily used aircraft in a ground support role. The inline liquid cooled Merlin engine of the Spitfire and Hurricane are terrible for that role.
 
The Spitfire had various wing designs for its armaments. All Mk.I, most Mk.II and a handful of Mk.V Spits had the 'A' wing, fitted with 4 .303 Brownings per wing. Most Mk.V's and early Mk.IX's had the 'B' wing, fitted with 2 .303 Brownings and 1 20mm Hispano per wing. Many Mk. V's, especially those sent to the Mediterranean, had the 'C' wing (or Universal Wing) which housed either 2 20mm Hispanos, or 1 20mm Hispano and 1 .50 Browning per wing. And most Mk.IX's, and all Mk.XIV's and XVI's had the 'C' wing (universal wing) with 1 20mm Hispano and 1 .50 Browning.

There was a small number of cannon-armed Mk. IBs built, which were briefly used by 19 squadron. The cannon installation was prone to malfunctions at this time and it was not until after the Battle of Britain that the 2 cannon and 4 MG armament became common.

The "C" wing also changed the cannon ammunition feed from 60-round drums to 120-round belts. Each wing could accomodate four .303 MGs, one cannon and two .303 MGs, or two cannon, with the second configuration being prevalent.

The "E" wing did away with the outer two gun ports on each wing and could mount either one .50 MG and one cannon per wing or (less commonly) two cannon per wing.

Marks IX, XIV, and XVI were all manufactured with both "C" and "E" wings.
 
Considering that Merlins were "no good" for low-level work, the Hurribombers and ground-attack Spits sure did a decent-enough job on the German railroad rolling-stock and on locomotives especially. We had a fellow in this town who specialised in locomotives, got more than a dozen. When I was in Koln, almost 30 years after the War, the roof over the loading platform at the Bahnhof still was shot all to blazes. The tin on top was new but the support struts, the uprights, looked as if the mice had been at them. They had all the holes below about 12 feet chalked for welding at that time, but you still could tell what had made the hole: .30-cal, .50-cal, 20mm or whatever.

Arguably the best ground-attack single-seater in the early part of the War was the much-maligned Bell Airacobra. A mid-engine design, it was the Warthog of its day: the whole front end of the bird was gun. The Russians got close to three-quarters of total production, after rebuilds on these, mostly in Canada for delivery up the Alaska by our guys and then across the Straits and along the Trans-Siberia by the Russian girls: a 15,000-mile trip before a shot was fired. The air museum in Tikkakoski is restoring one now.

As far as the Russians not liking American or British equipment, that was mainly because they didn't know how to make it. SOVIET equipment was great because it was a victory of The People over the international capitalist class.... not matter what its origin might be. The standard Russian light-duty military car was the GAZ-A: a modded Model A Ford. Their light-duty truck was the GAZ-AA, which was a Ford AA 3/4-tonner and their ton-and-a-half was the GAZ-AAA, still basically a Ford, made in Gorky in the German Ford plant that Henry sold to Russia in the '30s. Russia copied the Sherman, once they got their hands on a few, and Stalin referred to the Studebaker heavy truck as the best in the world. So much for them not liking our equipment..... once it had a Russian name. They copied Chevrolet and Packard cars, too, but Comrade Stalin, who never carried money, smoked a Dunhill pipe and was driven in a REAL Packard.... which just happened to be the American equivalent of a Rolls-Royce, should you be into older cars.

On a lot of equipment made for Russia, they specified the markings, even when the equipment was being given to them. Check out 'Russian' equipment carefully. You can find tires on light/medium artillery and on vehicles with English-language American markings facing the inside of the chassis; the outside said "SOVIET RUBBER TRUST"...... in Russian, of course. On our Fireflies, the Number 19 Sets (radios) were made in Canada by Northern Electric (iirc) but the controls all were in Russian first and then English.

Funny, but the Russians didn't like the Harley-Davidson 45-cubic-inch motorcycle, even though it was good enough for the USA, Great Britain, Canada and Japan to use through the War and for countries such as Greece to use into the 1970s. Even Fritz used the ones he captured! Russia did, though, manufacture a modded copy (Ural) of the German BMW R75M up into at least the 1980s, likely because you could put a machine-gun onto the side-car!

.
 
As far as the Russians not liking American or British equipment, that was mainly because they didn't know how to make it.

.

Russians loved US made products-I do agree with that.Like you mentioned,they did copy a lot of it including copy of B-29 named Tu-4.
 
Back
Top Bottom