Surge in grizzly bear shootings under provincial program sparks alarm

IronNoggin

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
UnReal. 10 identified problem bears and the anti's start pulling their hair out!

Surge in grizzly bear shootings under provincial program sparks alarm​

Former Alberta wildlife officer John Clarke said the number of grizzly kills so far this year is so high, it's hard to believe, but said it would in effect amount to an end of the grizzly hunt moratorium.

A provincial program allowing private hunters to kill problem grizzlies has claimed 10 of the bears so far this year, with critics saying those numbers are confirming their worst fears.

Most of the animals were killed in Alberta’s southwest corner, due largely to the threat they posed to livestock, said Forestry and Parks Minister Todd Loewen.

They occurred under a program announced in 2024 that grants private hunters authorization to kill grizzlies if they’re determined by wildlife officers to be habituated or to have killed livestock.

Provincial officials say the policy does not represent a resumption of the grizzly bear hunt that’s been banned for a decade.

Loewen said the shootings are a reflection of an unfortunate increase in human-grizzly conflict, specifically involving ranchers.

“There’s been an increase in incidents … it falls along the line of negative interaction (between) humans and grizzlies,” said the minister, adding the government’s wildlife management policy is “always based on science.”

By comparison, one grizzly was killed under the program in 2025, “but it didn’t come into place until partway through the year,” he said.

Sport hunting of grizzly bears ended in 2006 over concerns for the population’s sustainability, with the animal listed as a threatened species in 2010.

That designation sits at the middle of a scale, with endangered being the most urgent and vulnerable being the least.

In 2008, the province implemented a grizzly bear recovery plan, which seeks to restore habitat, reduce human-animal confrontation and bear mortality.

The province says the number of grizzlies in Alberta has grown from 800 in 2010 to more than 1,100, with counts tabulated by DNA analysis of hair from rub trees.

But a count of the animals hasn’t been done since 2018, though the province has commissioned a monitoring program in two of Alberta’s seven bear management areas in an effort to better gauge grizzly sustainability.

The province’s bear recovery plan calls for a count every five years.

‘I would call that a hunting season’

Critics of the problem bear policy say it lacks transparency and that its toll on the animals confirms their concerns that it makes it harder to control outcomes.

Former Alberta wildlife officer John Clarke said the number of grizzly kills so far this year is so high, it’s hard to believe, but said it would in effect amount to an end of the grizzly hunt moratorium.

“That’s a lot … I would call that a hunting season,” said Clarke, who now operates a bear safety consultancy in the Crowsnest Pass.

He’s previously said the policy makes it more likely for innocent bears or reproductively-vital females to be killed.

“I’d really want to know where that’s been (happening), whether they’re male or female,” said Clarke.

A conservation specialist called the number of grizzlies killed under the program alarming, saying her group has been kept in the dark about how it’s been unfolding.

“We had concerns it’d increase the number of bears being killed, that people would try to find the opportunity to kill bears that would not normally be euthanized,” said Ruiping Luo of the Alberta Wilderness Association.

“We’ve been trying to get information on the program and (government officials) said they’d get us that but they never did or a lot of it’s been redacted.”

She said it’s not clear the province is seriously considering other ways to approach the issue that avoids killing increasing numbers of grizzlies.

Critics have pointed to the government not employing designating animal conflict specialists, though its bear recovery program calls for them in each bruin management area.

One conservationist called the hunting program “absolutely obscene” given the province invests so little in addressing human-bear friction.

“We’ve got threatened species that’s suffered a number of insults and instead of Alberta solving the problem of problem people, they’re allowing the unintended encouragement for bear-human conflict,” said Jim Pissot of Defenders of Wildlife Canada.

But Loewen said those anti-conflict tasks are still being carried out by regular wildlife officers who engage with landowners on how best to reduce them.

And he defended the problem bear policy as consistent with euthanizations carried out by officers.

“There’s really no difference at all — it doesn’t matter to the science of the person who pulls the trigger,” said Loewen.

“It’s done in conjunction with a biologist.”

He said his government makes no apologies for a program meant to protect Albertans’ lives and their prosperity.

“When it comes to public safety and the safety of livelihoods, it’s always a concern to us — we take notice and we should.”

In 2024, Loewen’s ministry said it has provided $100,000 for a bear smart program to mitigate wildlife-human conflict, and has established the Waterton Biosphere — Carnivores and Communities program that helps ranchers reduce livestock loss.

Grizzlies killed under the program are hardly the only ones dying unnatural deaths in Alberta, according to government statistics.

In 2024, a total of 40 grizzlies were killed by human hand, the largest number of any reported year and includes poaching, official removal and vehicle collisions. Of the 21 killed during official removals that year, seven were females.

Last year, that reported grizzly mortality was 18.

https://calgaryherald.com/news/loca...ootings-under-provincial-program-sparks-alarm

Good on Forestry and Parks Minister Todd Loewen for sticking to his guns!!
 
We hunted in Pincher creek for years up until 2 years ago when we lost access to our last private property because the landowner had 2 resident grizzlies living on their ranch and didn’t want the chance of a conflict with hunters. He was the 2nd landowner we talked to who said it’s the first time in their life they’ve seen grizzlies living full time in the lower elevation farmland. When we started hunting there 10 years ago we never saw grizz in the farmland, fast forward to the last few and it was a surprise NOT to see one in the farmland.
Talking to the C/O there and he said they’re dealing with grizzly run ins weekly in the farmland and they’d never seen that before either.
Point being, the ballot box conservation is not an effective management strategy.
 
I agree. Anyone who's in the bush in BC, knows that grizzly population is on the rise !
My experience with them, in the middle Fraser area of BC, is that I have SEEN 4, in the last 12 years, on our property. 1 was a human-comfortable sow that had had her cub shot off a local Native Family's front porch while it was head down in their garbage can. That one (9 years old, about 250 pounds weight) was darted in the arse, heli-lifted out into the sticks while in full estrous, and showed up a week later on the same hill she was darted on) was shot by poachers (all of whom kept their mouths shut, thus preventing the guilty from actually catching a charge) up in a nearby watershed. They pretty much had the time and place dialed in, as the sow had three different trackers attached, and the idiots destroyed two of them...

2 more were a pair of twin sisters, on our Property in the low ground, digging wild parsnip roots to get a bite to eat. These two were survivors, they pretty much spat out what they were chewing on, so as to not interfere with being able to breath as they ran away, and they disappeared in to the High Country again as fast as the frost line rose up, only down because the high country was still frozen up from a late spring.

The last was a male that had already been darted and transported almost 2000 Kms away, as a problem bear. His partner had been grossly overestimated by his size, and the local lot dealing with bears, OD'd him on whatever they were using as a Tranquilizer... But he was back trying to break in to the same Native woman's freezer (on her porch) and front door a couple weeks later, where one of the younger native guys shot him for it, immune from repercussions...

That latter one puts the absolute lie to the concept that there are only 25 or so Grizzlies in our particular zone. If that one bear could find it's way back to the exact place it was removed from, supposedly a permanent relocation, then the Biologists that are making the decisions about these bears, have not a single clue, let alone two to rub together, about what their actual capability to travel around this place is, whether it's sniffing out a Home area, a new girlfriend, or a seasonal food source.
 
about what their actual capability to travel around this place is,
Back in the eighties I and a buddy were hunting moose west of Fox Crick and came upon a large grizz track ( 2 or 3 inches longer than my size 11 felt winter boots). That track had no new snow in it and snow had quit that morning. We were hunting logging roads & lease roads and would intersept that bears tracks at different points in our travels. That bear was headed pretty much straight west and last time we seen his track was at least 25 miles from our starting point but we run out of lease roads to go any further...all this in 6 or 7 hours time frame.
He wasnt being chased by anything nor was he fallowing any game track...just going somewhere...
 
An avid hunter who's also participated in bear research, I live with grizzlies on my farm 24/7 in the central foothills, other than their denning season of course. Love having them around, and there are healthy numbers. I am in the bush most days and see their sign most of those days. On one game cam adjacent the farm i would get an average of 40 pics of griz per week in September and October, perhaps 6 different bears. Occasionally have an encounter with a bear or bears. I would say ten killed problem bears is not a lot of bears over their Alberta range but it is a lot of bears if it's confined mostly to a certain region (and of course we're not going to have a discussion on problem cows overgrazing public and other range cos they're sacred in my province, we're basically Hindus in cowboy hats.) Anyways, the discussions are always the same tired old s***. The guys with wood to kill a bear constantly clamoring for a hunt based on their biases, the anti's constantly having a fit based on theirs. The common ground between them being their bias. Bias is not truth. Listen to the science. If you're averse to science, keep some chickens. Read their entrails.

We did a great job boosting grizzly numbers, it's a miracle they are still here at all in 2026, that we didn't just wipe them out back when we were an apocalypse on the bison herds. Let's not blow it, I say.
 
Last edited:
30+ years tramping up and down the trunk fishing backwater cricks, pools and streams. Blacks are all I'd see but now silver backs are more common. Mostly camp and fish alone in late summer fall. Stopped pitching a tent the last several years and sleep in the back of truck when I'm in big critter country. Can't say what the population numbers are but grizzly are more plentiful now than 30 years ago.
 
BC Biologists suggest there are approximately 20,000 grizzlies in our province. The do-gooders would have you believe they are endangered!......:ROFLMAO::oops::LOL:

Closing the BC Grizzly hunt was based on emotion by left wing idiots. No science was involved.....:(

Our BC population has plenty of bears for a LEH hunt. The BC Conservation Officers normally shoot and kill more grizzlies than are allowed under the old LEH program. However the do-gooders have threatened to sue the COS and the BC Government if they keep shooting them, so now the COS has caved into not destroying any bears. (black or grizzly)
As a result, black bear attacks and grizzly attacks are way too frequent here in BC. And it will become worse over time. Bears that lose their fear of humans will eventually hurt or kill someone. The do-gooders do not care unless it's their families, or themselves being attacked.

This corrupt NDP EBY Government caters to left wing idiots, minority groups, druggies and tweakers, as well as the LGTBQ movement. Not normal hard working tax paying British Columbians. And yes I said British Columbians.....:) Apparently this term is also now offensive to the left wing ideology.....:(
 
Last edited:
My experience with them, in the middle Fraser area of BC, is that I have SEEN 4, in the last 12 years, on our property. 1 was a human-comfortable sow that had had her cub shot off a local Native Family's front porch while it was head down in their garbage can. That one (9 years old, about 250 pounds weight) was darted in the arse, heli-lifted out into the sticks while in full estrous, and showed up a week later on the same hill she was darted on) was shot by poachers (all of whom kept their mouths shut, thus preventing the guilty from actually catching a charge) up in a nearby watershed. They pretty much had the time and place dialed in, as the sow had three different trackers attached, and the idiots destroyed two of them...

2 more were a pair of twin sisters, on our Property in the low ground, digging wild parsnip roots to get a bite to eat. These two were survivors, they pretty much spat out what they were chewing on, so as to not interfere with being able to breath as they ran away, and they disappeared in to the High Country again as fast as the frost line rose up, only down because the high country was still frozen up from a late spring.

The last was a male that had already been darted and transported almost 2000 Kms away, as a problem bear. His partner had been grossly overestimated by his size, and the local lot dealing with bears, OD'd him on whatever they were using as a Tranquilizer... But he was back trying to break in to the same Native woman's freezer (on her porch) and front door a couple weeks later, where one of the younger native guys shot him for it, immune from repercussions...

That latter one puts the absolute lie to the concept that there are only 25 or so Grizzlies in our particular zone. If that one bear could find it's way back to the exact place it was removed from, supposedly a permanent relocation, then the Biologists that are making the decisions about these bears, have not a single clue, let alone two to rub together, about what their actual capability to travel around this place is, whether it's sniffing out a Home area, a new girlfriend, or a seasonal food source.

Pardon my ignorance, but why are people storing food and trash on their front porches in grizzly country?

Seems like a great way of attracting bears to places where they’re not wanted, no?
 
This NDP government here in bc could care less about hunting or fishing. What a shame, really.
BC has one advocacy group that speaks up for hunters, but most don't give it any regard and those that do speak up are often more critical than supportive, so no wonder hunting is circling the drain
 
Back
Top Bottom