they were a lack of rifles especially during stalingrad assaults were soldiers were carrying rifle or ammos was a common thing ... and it was during wwII.
If they were not fired, why would they need to be refurbed?
Or is it more correct to say the refurb mark is an inspection mark?
The Bulgarian ones are a bit of a mystery. The only thing they did to them was sand the stock, and re-stamp the exact same number vertically. They also added the serial number to the handguard underneath.
Nothing else was done. No refurb mark either. These rifles have their own criteria and are NOT soviet refurb guns. Bulgaria got them un-issued, and for some reason, decided to "refurb" them.
They are generally matching original serial numbers as well. See Horilka's thread on it.
So in conclusion, yes, they are likely un-fired since factory. Bores are usually 10+/10. Minty.
Edit: I should also add that the Bulgarian refurbs are incredibly scarce, and fetch much more than the average SVT-40, especially since numbers are often stamped originally matching.
Did they also deliberately mis-match the mags?
All 5 of my SVT's have mags that have new different numbers electro penciled on them, and none match the guns.
I'm starting the think the mags are NOT supposed to match!![]()
The Germans were very fond of them - mind you "gun with ammo" beats "gun without ammo" every time.
The whole lack of rifles thing was a WWI condition more than WWII. At some points in WWI there was only one rifle for every ten soldiers (conscripts). I imagine most people just carry the thinking over to WWII as they might be getting confused between wars (and if something gets repeated enough eventually people believe it).