Swiss Arms celebration!

[beltfed]

CR5 - you keep trotting out the same butt-hurt B/S respecting the Swiss Arms accuracy.
They ALL came with a guarantee and factory target that proved 10 rounds inside a 10cm x10cm square at 300m fired from a machine rest.
Many easily exceeded that from the factory.

For those that are metrically challenged that 3.94”x 3.94” square is just over 1moa, as 1moa is 3.44” at 300m

I know of no other manufacturer, not even custom guns that issues a similar test evaluation for a factory produced rifle.

Can you build or buy an AR that is as or is more accurate than a SA? Sure, but it’s going to cost you close to the same money for the same quality now a days....and sure as sh!t it isn’t going to be no cheap-a$$ run of the mill AR....

 

[Bartok5]

I like mine, so it's a keeper regardless of the law changing (again). Worst case it will join its 12(3), (4), and (5) bretheren collecting dust in the safe until I croak, followed by deactivation then sale as a paperweight. Big Brother always wins in the end, so the deac may as well make a buck for my kids. Sad, but inevitable in Kanada....

 

[cr5]

CR5 - you keep trotting out the same butt-hurt B/S respecting the Swiss Arms accuracy.
They ALL came with a guarantee and factory target that proved 10 rounds inside a 10cm x10cm square at 300m fired from a machine rest.
Many easily exceeded that from the factory.

For those that are metrically challenged that 3.94”x 3.94” square is just over 1moa, as 1moa is 3.44” at 300m

I know of no other manufacturer, not even custom guns that issues a similar test evaluation for a factory produced rifle.

Can you build or buy an AR that is as or is more accurate than a SA? Sure, but it’s going to cost you close to the same money for the same quality now a days....and sure as sh!t it isn’t going to be no cheap-a$$ run of the mill AR....

Not BS, the rifle I had was not as accurate as as my ACR or HK SL8 when using American Eagle black box 55gr in all of them. I'm sure the SA could have done better with different ammo but when feeding them all the same thing it was the least accurate. I could have lived with the accuracy but the point of impact shift when transitioning from bipod to supporting it on the magazine was 4-5 moa and that was not acceptable to me. It was so annoying that I simply removed the bipod in order to save weight and try to gain a little consistency.
Ya ya I've heard it before, the bipod is just to keep it out of the mud which is horsechit and just a pathetic excuse by fanboys. Or, the guys that say that it's because it's not a free floated handguard, well I've owned other rifles without a free floated handguard that didn't shift nearly that much.
It was a very nice rifle that was built like a tank. It was heavy but not too heavy to easily use in the field and I carried it around a couple days without any complaints about the weight. My only real complaint was the POI shift.

I still like the rifles but MY experience with them does not match up to what others claim.


Nice rifle Mark, I wish I had the cheek rest on mine when I had it.
I have two of those scopes, great value for the money.

 

[UncleWalther]

 

[Grapeshot]

Nice!