So if this is levelled at me, I can say with confidence based on my experience shooting competitions in Western Canada against some pretty damned fine opposition, (not to blow my own horn, but to definitively answer your question) that I'm an above average shooter. With over 25 years behind the trigger, 12 years in the military, a small arms instructor and coach, I think I have a pretty decent handle on the principles of marksmanship. Rifle to rifle and barrel to barrel granted there is going to be some variation, but when you have most people claiming a realistic 3-4 moa and someone posts a few groups and claims it is half that, the BS meter Starts ringing. Ammo? I tried pretty much everything under the sun and stuff hidden under rocks, and lots of well proven hand loads, so that isn't likely to be it either.
I'd suggest keep testing and report what it is, not what you want it to be....
Thats what Ive done! Jeez! Did you see all the variance I was getting with all the different ammo I was using. Ill go post up a ton more targets of me shooting some vmax at under 2 moa, but I don't think there is any way I can convince you of otherwise since that might prove a few things to you that maybe you don't want to face or believe.


















































