Teaser Snapshot of the CSR Interarms Sporting rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not sure if this has been answered yet or not. Is it a straight pull bolt like the ones you see in the UK were you only have to pull the bolt back to chamber a round or is it like the K31 were you need to manualy open and close the bolt

I was wondering this myself. The cocking handle doesn't look very nice for pushing forward.
 
Price is going to be the deciding factor for me...If it is over $500.00 I think I will pass and just continue to enjoy my SKS's

At $500 I would seriously consider it. I don't think it will come in that low though. More realistically, I would think about it at $800. $1000 would be tough to justify.

If it were a semi however...

Ben
 
Many guys here don't seem to realize that there is a fair amount of military semi-auto guns out there which have a gas shut off valve incorporated into them, so that the soldiers can benefit from maximum stopping power & accuracy via cycling the gun themselves by hand. It is also a good alternative to have if the semi-auto system starts malfunctioning for whatever reason.

This is the case of the Hakim, AG-42, Rashid, FN-49 and a few others. So, a "bolt action semi" might indeed not be such a terrible idea, as the gun would have far better accuracy and penetration (for hunting purposes) than a semi-auto AK with the same caliber & barrel length. Although I do agree that an SVD Dragunov would've been a better success with this type of set-up, as it is made for precision shooting to begin with, with or without the semi-auto feature.

Price will be the key in its' success. However, if this thing is NR, then the sky is the limit on what can be accomplished on its' platform. Perhaps they could even implement an inexpensive proprietary semi-auto conversion kit in the future?

;)
 
Last edited:
Many guys here don't seem to realize that there is a fair amount of military semi-auto guns out there which have a gas shut off valve incorporated into them, so that the soldiers can benefit from maximum stopping power & accuracy via cycling the gun themselves by hand. It is also a good alternative to have if the semi-auto system starts malfunctioning for whatever reason.

This is the case of the Hakim, AG-42, Rashid, FN-49 and a few others. So, a "bolt action semi" might indeed not be such a terrible idea, as the gun would have far better accuracy and penetration (for hunting purposes) than a semi-auto AK with the same caliber & barrel length. Although I do agree that an SVD Dragunov would've been a better success with this type of set-up, as it is made for precision shooting to begin with, with or without the semi-auto feature.

Price will be the key in its' success. However, if this thing is NR, then the sky is the limit on what can be accomplished on its' platform. Perhaps they could even implement an inexpensive proprietary semi-auto conversion kit in the future?

;)

I own an AG-42b, and it does not have any method whatsoever to control gas flow.

You have to put that in yourself... :p
 
Many guys here don't seem to realize that there is a fair amount of military semi-auto guns out there which have a gas shut off valve incorporated into them, so that the soldiers can benefit from maximum stopping power & accuracy via cycling the gun themselves by hand. It is also a good alternative to have if the semi-auto system starts malfunctioning for whatever reason.

This is the case of the Hakim, AG-42, Rashid, FN-49 and a few others. So, a "bolt action semi" might indeed not be such a terrible idea, as the gun would have far better accuracy and penetration (for hunting purposes) than a semi-auto AK with the same caliber & barrel length. Although I do agree that an SVD Dragunov would've been a better success with this type of set-up, as it is made for precision shooting to begin with, with or without the semi-auto feature.

Price will be the key in its' success. However, if this thing is NR, then the sky is the limit on what can be accomplished on its' platform. Perhaps they could even implement an inexpensive proprietary semi-auto conversion kit in the future?

;)

Lots of false info in your post ... Military rifles that have a gas shut off valve are not for ''maximum stopping power & accuracy via cycling the gun themselves by hand'' but in reality this feature is for launching rifle grenades.. And the AG42b does not have a shut off valve .....
 
Last edited:
This could sell for $100, and I wouldn't buy it. I find it pointless. Good luck to the importers with a SA version, if it came in around a vz58 price I'd consider one.
 
No, it would not be illegal, but since you've fundamentally altered the action of your firearm, you're going to have to send it to the RCMP to have them classify and give the OK on it. Someone is free to correct me if I'm wrong but that's how I've come to understand it.

Whether they would or not - I'm leaning to not. I don't think TW will be able to get an FRT for a SA Interarms either, regardless of the fact it may not have any interchangeable parts with a Tantal or AK. They will simply ban it because it looks and functions like an AK. If you've seen their press statement regarding the 858 family of rifles, it's pretty much a dead giveaway that they don't care about playing by the rules.

Hmmm... For a restricted version, I think you're correct. Without digging out one of my registration papers and looking at it, I seem to recall that they specify the type of action in the registration. Also, I think you are legally obligated to report any changes to a firearm if those changes would make the registration certificate inaccurate. For example, if the registration says "bolt action" and it's not a bolt action anymore, your reg cert might be considered invalid.

However, for non-restricted, there's no registration, and therefore no registry to update with accurate information when a change is made.

The legally regulated part of the firearm, the receiver, is an approved type. All the unregulated parts you attach to it don't add up to an illegal gun, as long as it isn't fully-automatic. It's the receiver itself... You can either own it, or you cannot own it. With no obligation to report changes to a non-restricted firearm (as long as those changes do not result in a restricted firearm), nobody needs to know what parts you attach to your receiver. Just keep the barrel length at 18.5" or more, the overall length over 26", and you haven't altered the firearm in such a way that it becomes restricted.

Do you have to report it to the CFO when you drill some holes in your receiver to mount a scope? Nope...

I can find nothing in Canadian firearms law that prohibits a person from making alterations to a receiver, as long as those alterations don't alter the serial number, or result in a fully-automatic firearm. Only those two modifications are explicitly specified as illegal.
 
How in the blue blazes is making a rifle a bolt action supposed to increase it's stopping power. The volume of gas tapped off to cycle the action is not going to result in a measurable drop in bullet velocity.

As for accuracy, it MAY have a slight effect in that there are fewer moving parts (in this case) but manually cycling a semi auto still moves the same number of parts.
 
This could sell for $100, and I wouldn't buy it. I find it pointless. Good luck to the importers with a SA version, if it came in around a vz58 price I'd consider one.

Yeah I think you are right. It would be SO annoying to shoot (depending on what you were doing). Looks cool though. My money would be better spent elsewhere for the type of shooting I do.

Ben
 
As has been posted on TW's Facebook page...

This is the first of a family of rifles in this theme, with a semi auto version in the plans

May not be word for word, but that was the gist of it.

A semi auto version in the plans -0kay. But no where does it say: "A semi-auto version that would be able to be imported into Canada, and meet our regulations." They can make as many different versions of the family that they like. An SBR, a pistol, a semi-auto, a full auto - Doesn't mean that we will be allowed to have them. They can apparently sell this version in the UK, but that doesn't mean the UK will let in a semi, because it's a variant of a CSR and not an AK. Same here. Just because we can get this one, doesn't mean a semi wouldn't be classified different, and personally I think it would be. I don't have to like it, or agree with it. Heck, I don't agree with the whole "Prohibited Class" and would like to see it gone.

I am not saying that this rifle is bad at all. It may actually help us in the long run. If they continue to approve firearms like this, it may muddy the waters enough that the whole Restricted-Prohibited class becomes unworkable. We just have to hope that it would become unworkable and re-written while a conservative government (not necessarily the CPC, but a conservative government) is in power.
 
Ok after suffering all the 28 pages I think I will reserve judgment until that and other model are out as there is maiby potential for great thing's. ... if there semi auto fail to pass the classification it will be a painful fail for them.
 
Well as others have said it would be nice to get this Rifle Semi Auto form... but at the end of the day I can still see myself purchasing one of these to add to the collection.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom