tell me about the Savage 25 - worth buying?

Mr. Friendly

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
EE Expired
Rating - 96.9%
29   1   2
saw a Savage 25 in .22 Hornet for less than $500 new.

in the bit of Googling I've done on the .22 Hornet and available guns, I've read recommendations to steer clear of the Savage 25. if it's so bad, why is it still around? :yingyang:

shouldered a .17 Hornet in Laminate and the .22 Hornet in plastic...definitely need to change the stock, but still don't think there are any new .22 Hornet out there for $600ish new ($100 for the Boyd's Laminate upgrade).

thanks! :D
 
saw a Savage 25 in .22 Hornet for less than $500 new.

in the bit of Googling I've done on the .22 Hornet and available guns, I've read recommendations to steer clear of the Savage 25. if it's so bad, why is it still around? :yingyang:

shouldered a .17 Hornet in Laminate and the .22 Hornet in plastic...definitely need to change the stock, but still don't think there are any new .22 Hornet out there for $600ish new ($100 for the Boyd's Laminate upgrade).

thanks! :D

In my opinion, most of the "recommendations to steer clear of the Savage 25" are based on early growing pains of both the cartridge, as supplied by Hornady, and early versions of the M25 as well. Furthermore, when people have problems, they get amplified on the internet over and over again as the original complainant repeats his complaints every chance he has, and others read said complaints and repeat them in the form of "I've read on the forums that....", or "the consensus seems to be that....". But rarely to never are the great reviews repeated, partly because the happy customers don't usually make a lot of noise.

All that to say, I bought a brand new M25 in .17 Hornet in Feb 2016, have put about 250 factory rounds through it and about 100 of my own loads and am delighted with the rifle and cartridge. I have the laminate "Lightweight Varminter", which isn't really lightweight :). It is an absolute tackdriver with factory ammo, and I'm still doing load development but have found a couple very promising loads, one of which I will be doing extensive testing with today.

Both the cartridge and rifle have some unique quirks that take some getting used to. Because of the short cartridge length and steep loading angle from the magazine (at least in the Savage, can't speak for the Ruger or CZ versions), you can't be timid about working the bolt. That said, I never have any problem chambering cartridges. This is one of the common complaints, doesn't chamber reliably, supposedly. Not from my experience.

You'll also hear about ejection problems; again, if you work the bolt properly, there is absolutely no problem. If you're timid, the case may not exit the ejection port, which in the Savage is a machined "window" for lack of a better term. But it's not problem to just tip the rifle to the right and the case falls out fine. As a reloader, I try to catch all my cases as they exit so they don't go flying, or get bent at the neck from landing on cement. So I end up working the bolt to extract too gently on occasion. But this is all normal behaviour in my opinion.

You'll also hear complaints about the bolt being stiff to open. I think most people who complain about this fail to realize that the M25 action cocks on opening the bolt, therefore there is more resistance on opening than there is with rifles that #### on closing the bolt.

The other very common complaint you'll read (although if you look at the date of the posts you'll see that they generally go back a few years) is that pierced or leaky primers are common. I'll say two things about this: as I've mentioned, I have fired over 250 factory rounds through my rifle in the last couple of months without a single such problem. Because the .17 Hornet isn't a particularly mainstream cartridge yet, I have found that the stores from which I bought the various boxes of factory stuff from had some stock that was clearly older than others. I ended up buying a few boxes of 20 grain VMAX that had brass coloured primers, others that used silver coloured ones. For the record, there was a clear difference in pressure between the two, with the silvered coloured ones giving about factory velocity (~3650fps), while the brass coloured ones averaged about 3750fps.

An important thing to keep in mind is that the .22 Hornet is a very unique, finicky cartridge that takes a lot of getting to know. I had one many years ago that I reloaded for, and I blew many primers, split many cases and crushed many shoulders before I figured out how the little beast worked. Can you imagine if that cartridge had been introduced in the internet age? It would have been doomed. But it's a wonderful round, as many, many knowledgeable people will attest. The .17 is its offspring, and it has its quirks as well. It's a tiny little case that is extremely sensitive to how it's loaded. But I love it, and I love my M25.

Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
For a few bucks more you can buy an M77 in excellent condition. My son had a Savage 25 in .17 Hornet for a brief stint... I didn't much care for it as compared to my 77's and neither did he, and sold it. The overall fit/finish and feel of the rifle was nowhere near the quality of the 77, although it was reasonably accurate. I have always liked the Hornet round, but I will echo the above opinion that it is a "finicky" round. In downsizing my collection I have sold off all of the Hornets and have worked on downloading my .223's to "Hornet and below" levels.
 
well, looking around, I found Cabela's has the .22 Hornet in a laminate model 25 for $550, plus there's the MIR for an additional $50US.

show me a Ruger 77 in .22 Hornet for $500. ;)
 
well, looking around, I found Cabela's has the .22 Hornet in a laminate model 25 for $550, plus there's the MIR for an additional $50US.

show me a Ruger 77 in .22 Hornet for $500. ;)

I bought one a year ago for $575 with four boxes of factory ammo and 200 once fired brass.
 
You'll also hear complaints about the bolt being stiff to open. I think most people who complain about this fail to realize that the M25 action cocks on opening the bolt, therefore there is more resistance on opening than there is with rifles that #### on closing the bolt.

Hope this helps.

I don't think anyone has made a commercial "#### on closing" bolt action in about 75 years lol.

Check Tradex for a few nice used .222 bolt guns they have listed now, $500 or so but it's a better cartridge then the 22 Hornet, and they are all better guns then the Savage 25 which is a terrible design.
 
I'm not looking for a better cartridge than .22 Hornet. it interests me, so I want one.

I could get a 220 Swift, fastest commercial cartridge in the world, but that's not what I'm after. :)

plus, I'm talking new...was that $575 new?
 
I'm not looking for a better cartridge than .22 Hornet. it interests me, so I want one.

I could get a 220 Swift, fastest commercial cartridge in the world, but that's not what I'm after. :)

plus, I'm talking new...was that $575 new?

Good luck finding a new quality rifle in 22hornet for $575. You just andwered your question as to why the Savage 25 is still around.
 
I'm not looking for a better cartridge than .22 Hornet. it interests me, so I want one.

I could get a 220 Swift, fastest commercial cartridge in the world, but that's not what I'm after. :)

plus, I'm talking new...was that $575 new?

Well the Swift is not really but I digress.
$575 new for #### quality though, new doesn't mean better these days by the way.
The .22 Hornet is barely above a .22mag, it's finicky to load as already mentioned, and well the 25 is a #### rifle. The .222 is a stupid accurate cartridge, easy to load down or up, easy to source components and factory ammo is even around.
Even if someone's heart was set on the Hornet, I'd say find an older Ruger or CZ, at least they are made half decent.
 
Well the Swift is not really but I digress.
$575 new for #### quality though, new doesn't mean better these days by the way.
The .22 Hornet is barely above a .22mag, it's finicky to load as already mentioned, and well the 25 is a #### rifle. The .222 is a stupid accurate cartridge, easy to load down or up, easy to source components and factory ammo is even around.
Even if someone's heart was set on the Hornet, I'd say find an older Ruger or CZ, at least they are made half decent.

My 22Hornet load averaged over 2900fps with a 40gr bullet, which is a huge step up from the 22WMR. As to loading it, my Anschutz 1730HB produced sub 1/2 moa with the first load combination that I tried. Yes the 222rem is a great cartridge, but the 22hornet can be a very good choice, depending on the application.
 
Last edited:
My 22Hornrt load averaged over 2900fps with a 40gr bullet, which is a huge step up from the 22WMR. As to loading it, my Anschutz 1730HB produced sub 1/2 moa with the first load combination that I tried. Yes the 222rem is a great cartridge, but the 22hornet can be a very good choice, depending on the application.

Well an Annie is certainly a step up in quality over most .22 hornet offerings today. I see it used a lot with old trappers still in the bush. I think it's a fine cartridge myself and obviously better when handloaded of course.
 
The Hornet is a special cartridge, it is not a long range or high energy shell. I shoot mine more than most other CF rifles. I use it because I like it. I have other 22 cf but this is my fav. I can reload it very cheaply and it hits harder than any rimfire. I hav used it when calling coyotes in close cover. Get a good one as you will keep it for years.
 
I only had good luck with my model 25. Odd looking, but shoots wells, stock is nice but the comb to too low(needs cheek rest), bluing is bright. The 4rd magazine works, but I wish it was 5rds.
I'm selling mine cause I got a rem700 that's more suited to range work, that I can alter to have a 5 or 10rd dbm on.
I really don't see why people hate on the model 25. I'm guessing because it's a savage.
 
I had a M25 synthetic in .223 for a short while but the LOP was too long for me and with the way they install the recoil pad there was no easy fix for it other than a new stock and I didn't like the rest of the gun enough to bother with that. Plus a wood stock would have made it way heavier and I bought it to be light. That said it did shoot quite well.

Take a look at the "new" 22 TCM cartridge. It looks like a real winner and MGM and Bellm both make barrels for it if you have a Contender. MGM would probably make one for an Encore also. I'm waiting till Canward starts bringing in the RIA/Armscor rifles for it as I already have a .223 barrel for my Contender. The handguns look really nice also but I don't do restricted any more.
 
hey lw, is this Remington 700 in .22 Hornet as well, or something else?

my 25 is in 223.
I would of took the .17hornet** actually my savage was supposed to be in .17hornet but the lgs sold the one I wanted.
Shoulder, cycle the action, test the trigger. If it fits in store & feels good - great cause as said by elim, there's no real place to go to make one fit.
I never had any function issues with the .223, everything fed, shot and extracted without issue - .22/.17hornet ymmv
elimsprint, I'm waiting for the .22tcm rifles too.

**This is only due to pei hunting regulations and calibre restrictions
 
well, I started looking up reviews on the Model 25 and most of the reviews in the last 3 years were pretty positive.

gun does look & function differently than used to, so that's probably what all the nay sayers are about.

however, same price for a EABCO barrel, so still likely to go that route. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom