The 1 MOA Hoax: How manufacturers have confused shooters

[remington jim]

https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/1418830-Barrel-heat-amp-accuracy


Going back a few years , I tested a couple heavier barrel 223 rifles with 90 round strings in groups of ten shots and only pausing to reload. Pics don't load anymore but the last groups from hot barrel, were smaller than the first ones from a cold bore

That Was a very KOOL test you did there ! RJ

 

[iron cat]

3” stretch material works Well . RJ

Yup, pretty easy to rig up and get the materials from Walmart etc., I have used it a few times in the past .
My son bought a bunch of venetian blind material and made up a bunch like the one on my rifle.
Cat

 

[PSE]

And also... " this degree of testing is not required for hunting," wouldn't you agree???

LOL. Yes I would agree.

This reminds me of the Jerry Seinfeld episode where they were constantly making the quip often throughout the skit "Not that there's anything wrong with that"

 

[Joel]

https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/1418830-Barrel-heat-amp-accuracy


Going back a few years , I tested a couple heavier barrel 223 rifles with 90 round strings in groups of ten shots and only pausing to reload. Pics don't load anymore but the last groups from hot barrel, were smaller than the first ones from a cold bore

Are you sure thats tested well enough to ethically hunt with?

Awesome test! Really addresses some commonly held beliefs (or rather misbeliefs) there.

 

[hoytcanon]

LOL. Yes I would agree.

This reminds me of the Jerry Seinfeld episode where they were constantly making the quip often throughout the skit "Not that there's anything wrong with that"

Lol... And then there is; "No soup for you!"