I don't want to be a wet blanket. But one of the things that always occurs to me when reading a discussion like this is the ugly underlying fact that our sport is generally losing members and there are few initiatives that I have seen that would replace them, especially with young people. As a result, there is an underlying competition for participation of present shooters, e.g. if one is dedicated to shooting trap, one isn't dedicated to shooting sporting clays etc. Another thing that is apparent is that there is an enormous competition for young people's time and in sports that have more general social support, e.g. hockey, basketball, etc. While bringing sports like FITASC in or having a national sporting clays association seem like worthy pursuits to me, they will likely do very little to change this. Sadly, I have believed for some time that our sport will likely end up, probably is now, a small sport without the infrastructure to support much of anything, including international competition of any kind, except by some form of elite. We simply don't have the large numbers of shooters at home to support many forms of shooting in any other way and we don't have the infrastructure or the collective will to change this. In fact, we probably don't know how and there appears to be too much against us. I hope this isn't true, but I'm afraid it is. It's good that people are enjoying FITASC or sporting clays or whatever, but hard to take large dreams seriously when there is a massive underlying problem with infrastructure in the shooting sports staring us right in the face and no obvious way of dealing with it.